Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Harvey Milk's Letter to Jimmy Carter Defending Rev. Jim Jones

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,457
    Thanks
    340
    Thanked 614 Times in 494 Posts
    Groans
    148
    Groaned 510 Times in 418 Posts

    Default Harvey Milk's Letter to Jimmy Carter Defending Rev. Jim Jones

    Harvey Milk's Letter to Jimmy Carter Defending Rev. Jim Jones


    Even in 1978, the very year he orchestrated the mass-suicide that ended over 900 lives in Jonestown, cult leader Jim Jones could count on people as influential as politician Harvey Milk - recently the subject of an Academy Award-winning movie - to fight his corner in his absence. With Jones and congregation relocated to Guyana following increased speculation about the church in San Francisco, Milk - an advocate of Peoples Temple and personal correspondent of its founder - wrote the following letter to then-President Jimmy Carter in an effort to defend Jones' reputation in light of comments made by former member Timothy Stoen.

    Nine months later, on November 18th, 1978, Congressman Leo Ryan and four others were shot dead as they attempted to leave Jonestown following an inspection of the settlement and then, fearing the end was near, Jim Jones instructed his followers to poison themselves and commit 'revolutionary suicide'.

    Just days later, as San Francisco began to come to terms with the loss of many former residents, both Harvey Milk and Mayor Moscone were shot to death by Dan White.



    Transcript

    CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

    BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
    CITY HALL, SAN FRANCISCO 94102
    SUPERVISOR HARVERY MILK

    February 19, 1978

    President Jimmy Carter
    The White House
    Washington, D.C. 20500

    Dear President Carter:

    I am the Supervisor for District Five in the City of San Francisco. The Peoples Temple Christian Church is not located in my District, so I have no political ties or obligations to this church. I am writing to call an urgent concern of theirs to your attention. I am concerned at what I understand is the endorsement of some of our Congressmen for the efforts of Timothy Stoen against Rev. Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple. There are some facts I feel you should be informed of:

    Rev. Jones is widely known in the minority communities here and elsewhere as a man of the highest character, who has undertaken constructive remedies for social problems which have been amazing in their scope and effectiveness. He is also highly regarded amongst church, labor, and civic leaders of a wide range of political persuasions. Our own Board of Supervisors has presented Rev. Jones with a Certificate of Honor, unanimously passed by all members, praising the church for its many projects "which have been so beneficial to all the citizens of the Bay Area." On the same occasion, he was also presented with a unanimously passed resolution by a Republican State Senator, Milton Marks representing that legislative body.

    Timothy and Grace Stoen, the parties that are attempting to damage Rev. Jones' reputation, and seriously disrupt the life of his son, John, have both already been discredited in the news media here. The most widely-read columnist in the area, Herb Caen, printed Mr. Stoen's sworn testimony that John is not his child but rather Rev. Jones. Grace Stone is reported involved in what could be considered a blackmail attempt against another leader in the minority community, Dennis Banks, reported in the two major dailies with her name also given in Mr. Banks' sworn affadavit about the attempt.

    It is outrageous that Timothy Stoen could even think of flaunting this situation in front of our Congressmen with apparently bold-faced lies. I have learned in addition, that he has pressured these Congressmen towards unwitting compliance with promoting State Department intervention in the custody case now pending in Guyana.

    Not only is the life of a child at stake , who presently has loving protective parents in Rev. and Mrs. Jones, but our official relations with Guyana could stand to be jeopardized, to the potentially great embarassment of our State Department.

    Mr. President, the actions of Mr. Stoen need to be brought to a halt. It is offensive to most in the San Francisco community, and all those who know Rev. Jones to see this kind of an outrage taking place.

    Respectfully,

    (Signed, 'Harvey Milk')

    Harvey Milk

    cc: Rep. John Burton; Rep. Phillip Burton; Lt. Gov. Mervyn Dymally

    In August 2009, President Barack Obama posthumously awarded Milk the Presidential Medal of Freedom. California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger designated May 22 as "Harvey Milk Day", and inducted Milk in the California Hall of Fame.


    http://www.lettersofnote.com/2010/02...jim-jones.html




    Liberals are all to easy to convince to drink the kool-aid.

    Attachment 366

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

Similar Threads

  1. Hey Jimmy Carter......
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 01:18 PM
  2. Jimmy Carter More popular than George Bush, then and now!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-09-2008, 05:44 PM
  3. Notable Democrats: Jimmy Carter
    By Canceled.LTroll.29 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-12-2008, 08:13 PM
  4. Jimmy Carter strikes back
    By Topspin in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 08:38 AM
  5. Sex Scandal/jimmy Carter
    By toby in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2006, 10:47 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •