first civil war should be finely defined
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war
Powell: Iraq Is In A Civil War And Bush Should Stop Denying It »
Speaking with CNN reporter Hala Gorani in Dubai today, former Secretary of State Colin Powell said Iraq’s violence meets the standard of a civil war and thinks President Bush needs to acknowledge that. According to Gorani’s report, Powell said if he were heading the State Department right now, he would recommend that the Bush administration adopt that language “in order to come to terms with the reality on the ground.”
Watch it: CNN video at:
http://thinkprogress.org/
first civil war should be finely defined
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war
Umm the link you posted earlier had the definition in it Bob....
According to your other link, the fact that we are there and are targets of violence is the only thing keeping it from being in all respects a civil war.
So if we left it would become a civil war even by that blog. So our presence in Iraq is TECHNICALLY keeping it from being a civil war.
But realistically......
A civil war is a war in which parties within the same culture, society or nationality fight for political power or control of an area. Political scientists use two criteria: the warring groups must be from the same country and fighting for control of the political center, control over a separatist state or to force a major change in policy
so do the insergents play a role in that too or is it just our beiing there keep it from being a civil war, most AQ arnt from iraq atleast acording to most
Well our civil war had outside players as well.
Just a technicallity, Bush has depended greatly on technicallities to legally keep from lying.
Last edited by uscitizen; 11-29-2006 at 01:55 PM.
Quit being a bush apologist, and trying to word parse a way to defend him.
Syria had 40,000 troops in Lebanon as early as 1976, yet the Lebanese civil war raged on for at least a decade more.
Your going to look like a fool now, if you try to claim Lebanon wasn't a civil war.
what are the benifis of calling it a civil war ? who dose it beifit ?
Number one, it's the truth. What is it about republicans and their aversion to truth? Honesty and republicans -- it's like Vampires and sunlight.
Second, we have to be honest about what it is - a civil war, because the military and diplomatic tactics one uses in a civil war are different than one would use in an insurgency.
Agreed it is the truth, but I suspect there are other reasons Bush does not the Iraq war to officially become a civil war. by international law, etc we might not be allowed to be in there or something.
I expect there are several ramifications politically / legally when this officially becomes a civil war...
Bookmarks