AProudLefty (09-27-2023)
AProudLefty (09-27-2023)
I am saying we can make educated guesses, hypothsize, make informed speculation..
Making determinations is a decades or centuries long scientific investigation project.
Very few exoplanets we've found are suitable for life, though that might change as technology improves.
We also would have to observe definite biosignatures in exoplanets atmospheres
AProudLefty (09-27-2023)
The universe is deadly to life.
The cosmos is bathed in cosmic radiation and gamma rays lethal to any biology we can concieve of.
We tend to not think about it, sitting beneath our thin life sustaining atmosphere, and invisible magnetic field.
It probably took an almost a perfect storm of events to have a planet like Earth with the correct orbital, geophysical, and chemical parameters for biology
Mars was supposed to be habitable. But 50 years of study, and countless probes have turned up nothing.
Half a century of SETI, we have never seen any evidence of an artificial signal in the EM radio and microwave spectrum.
I am hopeful that life is out there. But I see no reason to hypothsize or expect it's going to be ubiquitous. I think we are all just culturally used to our experiences with Star Trek and Star Wars.
Just my two cents
The $64 question being "Why only on Earth?" What little evidence we have is that life, once started, is hard to kill off. Even if the Earth had another impact event or super volcano, even a nuclear exchange, life would continue to exist....just not human life. LOL
Still, human beings have been looking for life ever since we realized we're on a planet and that the "wandering stars" were other planets. So far, nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero indication that life exists elsewhere in the galaxy. The religious say it's because God only put life on Earth. The realists think that's unlikely but have a hard time explaining Fermi's Paradox.
Current thinking, as Cypress and I have already discussed, is that life is very rare. An additional theory to explain why no other advanced species exist is that advanced species have a tendency to knock themselves back to lower levels. Something which our species has done a couple times and has come close to doing permanently.
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
Cypress (09-27-2023)
200 year is still long enough to prove that life isn't ubiquitous. Given the odds, I'm certain it exists elsewhere. The key question is "How rare is life in the Universe?"
LOL. I used to be a huuuuge fan of the Ancient Astronauts theory and read several of von Däniken's books in HS and early college. Eventually, like my fascination with UFO sightings, I realized they didn't add up. Space is too big and the distances too vast. I'd sooner believe the "ancient astronauts" are time travellers than interstellar visitors.
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
AProudLefty (09-27-2023), Cypress (09-27-2023)
Doc Dutch (09-27-2023)
Earth seems to be finely tuned to support life. The universe is deadly to life, but Earth has an established geophysical, chemical, orbital characteristic protecting the planet from the lethality of the cosmos.
I think we are the only rocky planet in our solar system with a protective magnetic field.
It seems like if and when life gains a toeholds, it resists knockout punches.
I personally hope the Webb telescope can discover the Klingon home world.
AProudLefty (09-27-2023), Doc Dutch (09-27-2023)
...or angels...which is the same thing, IMO. LOL Yes, it makes me wonder. Still, ancient people thought a lot of things which have never come to pass.
Agreed on exoplanets. Still, our planet is a little younger than those toward the center of our galaxy. If the human race keeps advancing as we have the past 2000 years, where will we be in another 500 or a 1000 years? The older systems are thousands, if not millions of years, older than us. Where are they?
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
AProudLefty (09-27-2023)
Global Warming violates the 1st LoT by claiming the magical increase in thermal energy out of nothing, in the form of a temperature increase, which is somehow caused by a magical substance.
Greenhouse Effect violates Stefan-Boltzmann and black body science by claiming that an increase in earth's temperature is somehow caused by a decrease in earth's radiance.
Greenhouse Effect violates the 2nd LoT by claiming that the cooler atmosphere somehow heats the warmer earth's surface.
Bookmarks