Trump's attorneys unable to locate sensitive military document he discussed on tape

[Damocles]

You are offering up your opinion, which is not based upon fact only your hate for this President. As to any details you know nothing.
Its truly incredible that you think a former president took national security classified documents, refused to return them, lied about having them and then showed them to who knows how many people.
My friend that is espionage, and it has nothing to do with anyone else who also had secured documents, which by the way, were immediately returned.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...bers#xj4y7vzkg

"Immediately" returned... Some of the documents were from his time in the senate. Decades, that is not "immediate". You have got to stop lying to yourself.

The reality is, classified documents from the time he was in the Senate had no business being in Brandon's house, it is illegal to bring them there, to store them there, and to possess them. To say he "immediately" gave them back is absurd. He shouldn't have had them there in the first place.

Now I can see how someone who was and/or is President of the US can have documents given to them at their house, and had that been the case with Biden's documents you would not be hearing from me about this, shoot even as VP I can see it happening as you get the same briefings the President gets so you can step in if needed, thus I was not saying this about the docs in his garage as others were, as those may have been when he was VP and such things can follow you around for briefings, etc. and be misplaced, I even said that back then. However they found documents that were decades old and from his time in the Senate.

We know that Senators only have access to those documents in the SCIF under the Capital, and that they cannot take them out of there, or even notes, and are not allowed electronic devices which can image or make copies of them... If those documents were from that time, then they were there illegally. There is no reasonable explanation.

Now Trump, if this tape of him talking about having documents he shouldn't exists, even though he was President it would not fix his problem. That would be the same crime Brandon was committing by holding documents at his house illegally.

[floridafan]

"Immediately" returned... Some of the documents were from his time in the senate. Decades, that is not "immediate". You have got to stop lying to yourself.

The reality is, classified documents from the time he was in the Senate had no business being in Brandon's house, it is illegal to bring them there, to store them there, and to possess them. To say he "immediately" gave them back is absurd. He shouldn't have had them there in the first place.

Now I can see how someone who was and/or is President of the US can have documents given to them at their house, and had that been the case with Biden's documents you would not be hearing from me about this, shoot even as VP I can see it happening as you get the same briefings the President gets so you can step in if needed, thus I was not saying this about the docs in his garage as others were, as those may have been when he was VP and such things can follow you around for briefings, etc. and be misplaced, I even said that back then. However they found documents that were decades old and from his time in the Senate.

We know that Senators only have access to those documents in the SCIF under the Capital, and that they cannot take them out of there, or even notes, and are not allowed electronic devices which can image or make copies of them... If those documents were from that time, then they were there illegally. There is no reasonable explanation.

Now Trump, if this tape of him talking about having documents he shouldn't exists, even though he was President it would not fix his problem. That would be the same crime Brandon was committing by holding documents at his house illegally.

Before we continue, I must ask you to grow the fuck up, and stop acting like a child. The president has a name, use it. I dont care what you think of him, but that nickname you have given him, just makes you look like shit. Be an adult, and write like one.

[Damocles]

Before we continue, I must ask you to grow the fuck up, and stop acting like a child. The president has a name, use it. I dont care what you think of him, but that nickname you have given him, just makes you look like shit. Be an adult, and write like one.

I don't care about your feels. People who never said a thing about "Drumpf" "tRump" "That Orange Man" "President Orange Man" and the myriad others do not have the moral authority or the high ground. They do not get to tell me what I can call Dementia Joe Brandon. So long as you understand who I am referring to, I don't give one whip how "offended" you may be by it.

Never once did I demand anyone at all to stop using "names" to refer to Trump (nor did you, Mr. YouMustGrowUpLikeMe), because I am not "offended" by someone making fun of the pResident. If you want to use Brandon's real name, use it. If you want to change it in your mind to what you want to see, by all means do so. But until you can give me six years of you denouncing anyone who ever made fun of tRump, then you have no means to pretend you are on some special pedestal of personal perfection and "demand" I speak the way you want me to speak.

If you think it makes me "look like doo" then go ahead and think it, you do not offend me, nor do you make me believe that you suddenly are incapable of understanding who I am referring to any more than you are when Jarod (for example) refers to tRump as "tRump" (like I did). LOL

Anyway, stop trying to misdirect the conversation with weak ad hom attacks on my supposed childlike writing, make your point and move on. You will fail to "shame" me into using the words you want me to use. I chose to reference the pResident in a way that may bother you, get over it.

[Nordberg]

I don't care about your feels. People who never said a thing about "Drumpf" "tRump" "That Orange Man" "President Orange Man" and the myriad others do not have the moral authority or the high ground. They do not get to tell me what I can call Dementia Joe Brandon. So long as you understand who I am referring to, I don't give one whip how "offended" you may be by it.

Never once did I demand anyone at all to stop using "names" to refer to Trump (nor did you, Mr. YouMustGrowUpLikeMe), because I am not "offended" by someone making fun of the pResident. If you want to use Brandon's real name, use it. If you want to change it in your mind to what you want to see, by all means do so. But until you can give me six years of you denouncing anyone who ever made fun of tRump, then you have no means to pretend you are on some special pedestal of personal perfection and "demand" I speak the way you want me to speak.

If you think it makes me "look like doo" then go ahead and think it, you do not offend me, nor do you make me believe that you suddenly are incapable of understanding who I am referring to any more than you are when Jarod (for example) refers to tRump as "tRump" (like I did). LOL

Anyway, stop trying to misdirect the conversation with weak ad hom attacks on my supposed childlike writing, make your point and move on. You will fail to "shame" me into using the words you want me to use. I chose to reference the pResident in a way that may bother you, get over it.

Yeah, it does make you look bad. It is quite immature.

[Mason Michaels]

By that measure, so is pResident Brandon.

607746832030277ec967697e.jpg
Trump treason

[Jarod]

If this tape exists then I would say yes. Just as I would say it is clear that Brandon broke the law when documents that had no legal means to get into his house were found from days where he did not have access to them other than from the SCIF under the Capital. Even had he not brought them there himself, and there is no reasonable explanation as to how so many got there that doesn't start with him bringing them there, having them there and not returning them was illegal in and of itself.

I suspect is the statute of limitations has passed on any crimes Biden may have committed, and you would need evidence Bid we n put them there or knew they were there.

It is refreshing however to hear you admit if the reporting is true Trump has committed a crime.

[Jarod]

If this tape exists then I would say yes. Just as I would say it is clear that Brandon broke the law when documents that had no legal means to get into his house were found from days where he did not have access to them other than from the SCIF under the Capital. Even had he not brought them there himself, and there is no reasonable explanation as to how so many got there that doesn't start with him bringing them there, having them there and not returning them was illegal in and of itself.

I suspect is the statute of limitations has passed on any crimes Biden may have committed, and you would need evidence Bid we n put them there or knew they were there.

It is refreshing however to hear you admit if the reporting is true Trump has committed a crime.

Now let’s talk about obstruction of Justice… Why did they have to get a search warrant to get Trumps documents but were invited to search Biden’s house for such documents?

[Doc Dutch]

I suspect is the statute of limitations has passed on any crimes Biden may have committed, and you would need evidence Bid we n put them there or knew they were there.

It is refreshing however to hear you admit if the reporting is true Trump has committed a crime.

Not a lawyer, but isn't there a law about a "continuing conspiracy to hide a crime"?

[Jarod]

Not a lawyer, but isn't there a law about a "continuing conspiracy to hide a crime"?

If there is evidence that someone knew it was ongoing, like there is against Trump… yes.

[evince]

By that measure, so is pResident Brandon.

So you dont believe Biden is president?

[evince]

I don't care about your feels. People who never said a thing about "Drumpf" "tRump" "That Orange Man" "President Orange Man" and the myriad others do not have the moral authority or the high ground. They do not get to tell me what I can call Dementia Joe Brandon. So long as you understand who I am referring to, I don't give one whip how "offended" you may be by it.

Never once did I demand anyone at all to stop using "names" to refer to Trump (nor did you, Mr. YouMustGrowUpLikeMe), because I am not "offended" by someone making fun of the pResident. If you want to use Brandon's real name, use it. If you want to change it in your mind to what you want to see, by all means do so. But until you can give me six years of you denouncing anyone who ever made fun of tRump, then you have no means to pretend you are on some special pedestal of personal perfection and "demand" I speak the way you want me to speak.

If you think it makes me "look like doo" then go ahead and think it, you do not offend me, nor do you make me believe that you suddenly are incapable of understanding who I am referring to any more than you are when Jarod (for example) refers to tRump as "tRump" (like I did). LOL

Anyway, stop trying to misdirect the conversation with weak ad hom attacks on my supposed childlike writing, make your point and move on. You will fail to "shame" me into using the words you want me to use. I chose to reference the pResident in a way that may bother you, get over it.

This is so grind and not Damo


Damo never posted like this

[evince]

The “feels” thing is soooo grind

[evince]

Inferring Biden is a resident and NOT a president means the poster thinks the election was stolen



Damo would have never believed that clap trap


He insisted on facts

[Doc Dutch]

If there is evidence that someone knew it was ongoing, like there is against Trump… yes.

Like ordering people to hide evidence? Lie about it to investigators?

[Jarod]

Like ordering people to hide evidence? Lie about it to investigators?

Yup, like that.