FBI confirms existence of file linking Biden to $5 million bribery scheme

[floridafan]

They said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation. The only Russians were the Russian whores Hunter filmed himself with.

Looks like ,once again, another accusation going down the toilet. Sorry!

Whatever Hunter does is his business.

[Uncensored2008]

Mueller concluded that Russian interference occurred in a "sweeping and systematic fashion" and that there were substantial links between Russians and the Trump campaign.

Fucking liar.

The Office considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy-either under statutes that have their own conspiracy language (e.g. , 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349, 195l(a)), or under the general conspiracy statute (18 U.S.C. § 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law- including foreign-fnfluence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either under a specific statute or under Section 371 's offenses clause. The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under Section 371 's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a lawful function of the U.S. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855, 861 (1966); Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Concord Mgmt. & Consulting LLC, 34 7 F. Supp. 3d 38, 46 (D.D.C.2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officialsor between such officials and Russia-linked individuals-to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume I, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume I, Section II, supra. Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other U.S. person with conspiracy

[ExpressLane]

No. As usual, you're caving to the right wing propaganda.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/03/polit...nts/index.html

"The form in question, an FD-1023, is a document the FBI uses to memorialize meetings or information gathered from confidential sources. The document typically would include allegations from the source, including information not verified by the FBI."

Yep the FBI tried to bury it instead of investigating it. The House will investigate it. Biden's bribery scheme is unraveling.

[floridafan]

Fucking liar.

The Office considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy-either under statutes that have their own conspiracy language (e.g. , 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349, 195l(a)), or under the general conspiracy statute (18 U.S.C. § 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law- including foreign-fnfluence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either under a specific statute or under Section 371 's offenses clause. The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under Section 371 's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a lawful function of the U.S. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855, 861 (1966); Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Concord Mgmt. & Consulting LLC, 34 7 F. Supp. 3d 38, 46 (D.D.C.2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officialsor between such officials and Russia-linked individuals-to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume I, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume I, Section II, supra. Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other U.S. person with conspiracy

I suggest you speak to Mueller, the report is quite specific.

[Uncensored2008]

Bullshit

All according to Comer, Comer, no one else, just Comer, what Comer said somebody said to him, Comer, what Comer says, and what the f*ck is “stork dork,” another kid in Jersey blogging from his mother’s basement

Herr Comrade, if what Congress found is not true, then there is no document - except we know there IS a document - Wray has confirmed it.

FURTHER if the document did not incriminate Xi's man Joe, Wray would have no need to engage in a coverup - yet he DID coverup the evidence - first by lying about the existence, then when caught lying to congress - by obstructing justice by engaging in contempt of congress by refusing to turn the evidence over.

[Uncensored2008]

I suggest you speak to Mueller, the report is quite specific.

I suggest you read the report - or at least the section I posted

Then take a class in ethics - develop at least a hint of integrity.

You Nazi scum think that no lie is ever dead. Sure, you got the shit kicked out of you over your fuckwitted conspiracy theory. You knew it was a lie at the time, but Seig Heil - party is all. You got smacked down 4 years ago when Weissman admitted there was no collusion and no basis for the witchhunt.

But you figure hey, a good lie should never go to waste - so despite being a proven liar - you just start shitting out the same fucking lie again.

It's the way scum like you roll.

First rule of democrat is no integrity.

Second rule of democrat is lie for the party.

[floridafan]

I suggest you read the report - or at least the section I posted

Then take a class in ethics - develop at least a hint of integrity.

You Nazi scum think that no lie is ever dead. Sure, you got the shit kicked out of you over your fuckwitted conspiracy theory. You knew it was a lie at the time, but Seig Heil - party is all. You got smacked down 4 years ago when Weissman admitted there was no collusion and no basis for the witchhunt.

But you figure hey, a good lie should never go to waste - so despite being a proven liar - you just start shitting out the same fucking lie again.

It's the way scum like you roll.

First rule of democrat is no integrity.

Second rule of democrat is lie for the party.

What was posted is a fact. Deal with it.

[Uncensored2008]

Yep the FBI tried to bury it instead of investigating it. The House will investigate it. Biden's bribery scheme is unraveling.

Not if Chris Wray has anything to say about it. He has his best STASI working to coverup the Biden crimes.

[floridafan]

Yep the FBI tried to bury it instead of investigating it. The House will investigate it. Biden's bribery scheme is unraveling.

Give it up handjob, there is nothing there.

[Uncensored2008]

What was posted is a fact. Deal with it.

Nope, you fucking lying pile of shit.

The Office considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy-either under statutes that have their own conspiracy language (e.g. , 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349, 195l(a)), or under the general conspiracy statute (18 U.S.C. § 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law- including foreign-fnfluence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either under a specific statute or under Section 371 's offenses clause. The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under Section 371 's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a lawful function of the U.S. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855, 861 (1966); Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Concord Mgmt. & Consulting LLC, 34 7 F. Supp. 3d 38, 46 (D.D.C.2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officialsor between such officials and Russia-linked individuals-to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume I, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume I, Section II, supra. Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other U.S. person with conspiracy


Read it dumbfuck.

Lying fuck democrat is redundant.

[floridafan]

Not if Chris Wray has anything to say about it. He has his best STASI working to coverup the Biden crimes.

The document referred to in the OP was viewed and has nothing incriminating against this President.
Sorry, you fucking lose again.

[zymurgy]

Looks like ,once again, another accusation going down the toilet. Sorry!

Whatever Hunter does is his business.

Biden better come up with a good excuse in the debates. Whoever is challenging him from the GOP side will be sure to bring up how he lied about not knowing about his sons business.

They will remind the American people he dodged this last time around with a bunch of deep state operatives singing a bullshit letter about how it was Russian Disinformation

nobody is going to allow dems to fact check this away again in 2024

[ExpressLane]

Biden better come up with a good excuse in the debates. Whoever is challenging him from the GOP side will be sure to bring up how he lied about not knowing about his sons business.

They will remind the American people he dodged this last time around with a bunch of deep state operatives singing a bullshit letter about how it was Russian Disinformation

nobody is going to allow dems to fact check this away again in 2024

Indeed. And he won't have a teleprompter to read his response from.

[ExpressLane]

The document referred to in the OP was viewed and has nothing incriminating against this President.
Sorry, you fucking lose again.

You have not seen it and you don't know what it says.

[floridafan]

Biden better come up with a good excuse in the debates. Whoever is challenging him from the GOP side will be sure to bring up how he lied about not knowing about his sons business.

They will remind the American people he dodged this last time around with a bunch of deep state operatives singing a bullshit letter about how it was Russian Disinformation

nobody is going to allow dems to fact check this away again in 2024

If lies are to be discussed, DJT is in massive trouble. You know so well that he has lied about almost everything. But then again, after all the indictments coming down the road who knows if he will be a candidate