Originally Posted by
archives
How is it a “misconstrue?”
Haven’t you frequently told us the “well regulated militia” meant a citizens army to protect against over reach by the Government? And if guns are the necessity for this citizen’s army, isn’t all gun owners or even those possessing a gun therefore part of this “well regulated militia?”
Is a law enforcement agent who commits crimes still an agent of the state? or does violating the law remove those protections afforded to law enforcement?
that very same ideology applies to the every day citizen.......once they step outside of the societal rules of good conduct and choose to commit acts of unprovoked aggression against their fellow citizens, they are not part of that well regulated militia..........
your intention to smear all gun owners for the criminal acts of a few is exactly why I talked about morals..............meaning you have very little.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks