Doc Dutch=Asshole Stalker
Translation: Damn you, Dutch! How do you do it???
Experience and education, ma'am.
It's basically an application of the Imitation Game made famous by Alan Turing's computer intelligence research.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-18475646
The Imitation Game
In fact, Turing well understood the need for empirical evidence, proposing what has become known as the Turing Test to determine if a machine was capable of thinking. The test was an adaptation of a Victorian-style competition called the imitation game.
It involves secluding a man and woman from an interrogator who has to guess which is which by asking questions and studying written replies.
The man aims to fool the interrogator, while the woman tries to help him.
In the Turing Test, a computer program replaces the man. Turing asked: "Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does when the game is played between a man and a woman."
Effectively, the test studies whether the interrogator can determine which is computer and which is human (although Turing did not explicitly say that the interrogator should be told that one of the respondents was a computer it seems clear to me from his example questions that this was what he intended).
The idea was that if the questioner could not tell the difference between human and machine, the computer would be considered to be thinking.
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
Doc Dutch=Asshole Stalker
Being angry is detrimental to your best interests, Ms. BP.
https://www.psypost.org/2021/01/a-ne...ormation-59061
A new study has found being angry increases your vulnerability to misinformation
Human memory is prone to error — and new research provides evidence that anger can increase these errors. The new findings have been published in the scientific journal Experimental Psychology.
“My interest in the impact of anger on misinformation came from both real-world experience and research,” said study author Michael Greenstein, an assistant professor at Framingham State University.
“From the real-world side, there’s this phrase that people say — ‘don’t get emotional.’ That phrase is somewhat often used to describe anger and the idea that when you’re angry you’ll make poor decisions, which would also imply poor memory use.”
“From the research side, anger is an interesting emotion because it somewhat defies traditional classifications in that it’s a ‘negative’ emotion, but it impacts cognition in a lot of ways that are more similar to ‘positive’ emotions.”...
...The researchers found that anger did not impair the ability to recognize details actually present in the film. However, those in the anger condition were more susceptible to misinformation than those in the neutral condition. In other words, angry participants were more likely to misattribute details from the initial quiz to what they had seen in the film.
The researchers also found that participants in the anger condition tended to be more confident in the accuracy of their memories. But among those participants, increased confidence was associated with decreased accuracy. Among those in the neutral condition, in contrast, increased confidence was associated with increased accuracy..
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
Doc Dutch=Asshole Stalker
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"Russia emerges as Europe's most God-believing nation"
Two decades after the collapse of the USSR, history's most atheistic state, the vast majority of Russians attest to a belief in God – more than in any other European country – according to a new opinion poll. The survey, carried out in April by the independent Public Opinion Fund (FOM), found that 82 percent of Russians say they are religious believers, while just 13 percent say they do not believe in any deity
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Euro...lieving-nation
^^^
Is anyone really surprised that TD doesn't know the meaning of common sense? It doesn't surprise me.
Here, TD, let me help you understand what you clearly do not have...not that I blame the mentally ill for their inabilities to understand normal human behavior: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dict...common%20sense
sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
Cypress (06-11-2023)
On a day to day basis, the vast majority of people today have no idea about quantum physics, thermodynamics, the basic principles of organic chemistry, and they can't explain why the sky is blue, why the ocean is salty, or what light and gravity really are as natural phenomena. The garden variety person is more literate and more trained in using technology today. But I don't think people today are vastly inherently and innately smarter than people 2000 years ago.
In saying religions are "mostly wrong", that requires some analysis.
If the idea is that the bible is supposed to be a historical and scientific document, then it is largely wrong.
The mythical and legendary aspects of religion are either beyond conformation or just plain wrong.
If religion is thought of as a way of living a human life in the context of a divine universal order, I don't think it's possible to say it is mostly wrong. It becomes subjective at that point. I really didn't find anything foolish from reading the Gospel of Luke, and the canonical texts of Buddhism, Daoism, Hinduism because they contain a vision of right conduct and ethics that are so timeless, we have adopted them for ourselves even when we strip away the religious context.
Bookmarks