FBI has 5 days to produce documents or Director will face Contempt of Congress...

[T. A. Gardner]

I love to read you lies, honey bunch.
Do you have any idea of how many of trump appointees and family conducted business on their own private accounts? You gotta do better than this.
I cant wait for the day of trumps indictment and you whining that everyone else was as guilty as him.

Hillary was Secretary of State. There are specific laws requiring persons in positions such as that to conduct all official government business they do by electronic means on a government computer. One of the reasons for that is the files and documents created are to be archived. All classified government business must be done on a secure, government computer, no exceptions.
Hillary knowingly circumvented all of that in using a private server.

[T. A. Gardner]

Yes you can'y cure stupid if you could you would be committed to a stupid treatment facility right now. I said the data in her emails were classified. Transmitting classified documents on a private server is illegal. It is called mishandling classified data.

Documents and information that is classified can and usually is transmitted as such between secure servers and terminals at the time it is created. There is no lag between classification and transmission. Under no circumstances would classified information--or even potentially classified information--be transmitted to a private unsecure server legally.

[floridafan]

Hillary was Secretary of State. There are specific laws requiring persons in positions such as that to conduct all official government business they do by electronic means on a government computer. One of the reasons for that is the files and documents created are to be archived. All classified government business must be done on a secure, government computer, no exceptions.
Hillary knowingly circumvented all of that in using a private server.

The Trump administration declined to prosecute her. End of story.

[Nordberg]

Documents and information that is classified can and usually is transmitted as such between secure servers and terminals at the time it is created. There is no lag between classification and transmission. Under no circumstances would classified information--or even potentially classified information--be transmitted to a private unsecure server legally.

Here is what it was really like. https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...nt-fbi-214307/

[T. A. Gardner]

Here is what it was really like. https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...nt-fbi-214307/

Your article simply tries to excuse what Hillary did...

Together, the documents, technically known as Form 302s, depict less a sinister and carefully calculated effort to avoid transparency than a busy and uninterested executive who shows little comfort with even the basics of technology, working with a small, harried inner circle of aides inside a bureaucracy where the IT and classification systems haven’t caught up with how business is conducted in the digital age. Reading the FBI’s interviews, Clinton’s team hardly seems organized enough to mount any sort of sinister cover-up.

That amounts to She knowingly moved the server to her home, even though it is a gross violation of law, but the intent wasn't malicious, but rather because she was really busy and didn't understand the technology... That's an excuse for criminal behavior and nothing more.

Here is the same thing again:

Hillary Clinton comes across in the FBI interviews as a disengaged tech user who sees the communication tools as little more than a means to an end. She has, according to multiple aides, never even learned how to use a desktop computer.

Even that article clearly states, even if inadvertently, that Hillary knowingly was doing this shit

Except that what Clinton turned to others for help with wasn’t an Amazon purchase or reading CNN.com: She needed help managing a massive trove of communications about the inner workings of the nation’s diplomacy and national security. Over the course of five years, those emails lived first in her Chappaqua, New York, basement, then later in a data center in New Jersey, then they were FedExed across the country and possibly copied onto a thumb drive before being printed out, sorted and handed back to the State Department in 12 bankers’ boxes.

More dissembling that really is an admission of her guilt:

Clinton didn’t like the idea of carrying around two devices—one for official government work and one for personal or political correspondence, which is discouraged on government accounts. So she opted instead to carry only a single device, a personal BlackBerry, linked to a newly registered email account on a private domain, clintonemail.com, that was run off a recycled server from her unsuccessful presidential bid the year before.

The whole article tries to apologize and dissemble for the Hildabeast. She's fucking guilty as fuck of violating a whole raft of laws on government documents.

[floridafan]

Your article simply tries to excuse what Hillary did...

Together, the documents, technically known as Form 302s, depict less a sinister and carefully calculated effort to avoid transparency than a busy and uninterested executive who shows little comfort with even the basics of technology, working with a small, harried inner circle of aides inside a bureaucracy where the IT and classification systems haven’t caught up with how business is conducted in the digital age. Reading the FBI’s interviews, Clinton’s team hardly seems organized enough to mount any sort of sinister cover-up.

That amounts to She knowingly moved the server to her home, even though it is a gross violation of law, but the intent wasn't malicious, but rather because she was really busy and didn't understand the technology... That's an excuse for criminal behavior and nothing more.

Here is the same thing again:

Hillary Clinton comes across in the FBI interviews as a disengaged tech user who sees the communication tools as little more than a means to an end. She has, according to multiple aides, never even learned how to use a desktop computer.

Even that article clearly states, even if inadvertently, that Hillary knowingly was doing this shit

Except that what Clinton turned to others for help with wasn’t an Amazon purchase or reading CNN.com: She needed help managing a massive trove of communications about the inner workings of the nation’s diplomacy and national security. Over the course of five years, those emails lived first in her Chappaqua, New York, basement, then later in a data center in New Jersey, then they were FedExed across the country and possibly copied onto a thumb drive before being printed out, sorted and handed back to the State Department in 12 bankers’ boxes.

More dissembling that really is an admission of her guilt:

Clinton didn’t like the idea of carrying around two devices—one for official government work and one for personal or political correspondence, which is discouraged on government accounts. So she opted instead to carry only a single device, a personal BlackBerry, linked to a newly registered email account on a private domain, clintonemail.com, that was run off a recycled server from her unsuccessful presidential bid the year before.

The whole article tries to apologize and dissemble for the Hildabeast. She's fucking guilty as fuck of violating a whole raft of laws on government documents.

Hillary was not prosecuted by the Trump Justice Dept. Thats the end of the story, handjob.

[T. A. Gardner]

Hillary was not prosecuted by the Trump Justice Dept. Thats the end of the story, handjob.

No, not the end. Trump and his DOJ were obviously smart enough not to go after the person he just defeated in an election. That would have been seen as vindictive and politically motivated. On the other hand, now we have the moron Joke and his DOJ that look poised to do exactly that to a person that has a good possibility of being his opponent in the next election.

I'd say the Left, Joke, and his Minions of Ignorance are fucking retarded if they think that's a good idea. Sometimes you toss the small fish back to keep things in balance in the pond rather than viciously fishing it to death.

[Doc Dutch]

No, not the end. Trump and his DOJ were obviously smart enough not to go after the person he just defeated in an election. That would have been seen as vindictive and politically motivated. On the other hand, now we have the moron Joke and his DOJ that look poised to do exactly that to a person that has a good possibility of being his opponent in the next election.

I'd say the Left, Joke, and his Minions of Ignorance are fucking retarded if they think that's a good idea. Sometimes you toss the small fish back to keep things in balance in the pond rather than viciously fishing it to death.

Wow, Terry. You can always be counted upon to defend Trump at every turn.

[christiefan915]

Like something out of a comedy.

MTG was banging the House gavel yesterday and demanding House members show decorum.

I burst out laughing when I read that headline. The video was even better.

[QP!]

No, I only stated Of the three, only Trump has a viable excuse / reason in that he was president and could declassify the documents essentially on a whim. That is something neither Hillary or Biden can use as a defense. For them, there is no excuse, particularly in Hillary's case. She went far beyond the other two in using what amounted to a secret private personal server that was illegal in its entirety to receive classified information on. Even her intent was clearly felonious and criminal. At least in Trump's and Biden's case, the documents were just mishandled with no overt intent (at least none at this point) to misuse them intentionally.

Sure but the problem you have is that you are lying.

Trump had no credible defense. NONE.


Lying under Oath in a sworn affidavit and Obstruction of Justice are not waved even if you grant Trump declassified them (which he did not).


They are still government documents Trump has no right to possess and when he has his lawyers swear out a statement they gave them all back, while actively hiding them, that is the crime Trump did, that no one else did. Thus why Trump gets charged and no one else does.

[christiefan915]

given the timeline of events and information that came out, you'd have to be an absolute partisan moron to believe she wasn't guilty...it's why she wasn't elected.

you can always tell the partisan trash out there by the way they adamantly deny any wrongdoing when it's the politician they favor, but can condemn with the flimsiest of evidence when it's a politician they hate.

sounds like you.

Soounds like every trumper in the country.

[Nordberg]

Your article simply tries to excuse what Hillary did...

Together, the documents, technically known as Form 302s, depict less a sinister and carefully calculated effort to avoid transparency than a busy and uninterested executive who shows little comfort with even the basics of technology, working with a small, harried inner circle of aides inside a bureaucracy where the IT and classification systems haven’t caught up with how business is conducted in the digital age. Reading the FBI’s interviews, Clinton’s team hardly seems organized enough to mount any sort of sinister cover-up.

That amounts to She knowingly moved the server to her home, even though it is a gross violation of law, but the intent wasn't malicious, but rather because she was really busy and didn't understand the technology... That's an excuse for criminal behavior and nothing more.

Here is the same thing again:

Hillary Clinton comes across in the FBI interviews as a disengaged tech user who sees the communication tools as little more than a means to an end. She has, according to multiple aides, never even learned how to use a desktop computer.

Even that article clearly states, even if inadvertently, that Hillary knowingly was doing this shit

Except that what Clinton turned to others for help with wasn’t an Amazon purchase or reading CNN.com: She needed help managing a massive trove of communications about the inner workings of the nation’s diplomacy and national security. Over the course of five years, those emails lived first in her Chappaqua, New York, basement, then later in a data center in New Jersey, then they were FedExed across the country and possibly copied onto a thumb drive before being printed out, sorted and handed back to the State Department in 12 bankers’ boxes.

More dissembling that really is an admission of her guilt:

Clinton didn’t like the idea of carrying around two devices—one for official government work and one for personal or political correspondence, which is discouraged on government accounts. So she opted instead to carry only a single device, a personal BlackBerry, linked to a newly registered email account on a private domain, clintonemail.com, that was run off a recycled server from her unsuccessful presidential bid the year before.

The whole article tries to apologize and dissemble for the Hildabeast. She's fucking guilty as fuck of violating a whole raft of laws on government documents.

Nope. It was an explanation of a new system for government being handed to a person unfamiliar and uncomfortable with technology. You rightys cobble together some nefarious scenarios, where none exist. The reds investigated her a dozen times and could nothing. You should have testified. That would have given the committees a laugh.

[christiefan915]

The proved she had classified data on her server and some top secret classified data on it. Since "no reasonable prosecutor would indict her" neither should one indict Donald Trump.

Don't forget about the data that was classified after the fact.

[christiefan915]

Actually, Trump has a far better excuse than either Joke or the Hildabeast. He was president at the time, and presidents can declassify anything they choose to. Yes, there is a process for that officially, but at least Trump could make a reasonable argument that he declassified the documents. In the case of Joke and the Hildabeast, they had no such authority and were, and are, clearly in violation of law and rules covering the handling of classified documents. "I didn't know" isn't an excuse to not be charged. Possession, regardless of intent, is sufficient evidence to charge someone with mishandling classified documents.

I'm being fair about this, you on the other hand, are letting your terminal case of TDS get in the way.

Like he declassified those M-a-L docs just by thinking it.

[christiefan915]

Absolutely wrong! Possession is sufficient for criminal charges to be brought. Real life example I saw while in the Navy. A junior Petty Officer took a Reactor Plant Manual (RPM) home to study so he could get qualified sooner. His intentions were completely honorable and good. He showed the manual to no one else. He got caught bringing it back onto the ship. He was court martialed for mishandling classified documents.

INTENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. POSSESSION IS SUFFICIENT FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES.

His intentions may have been "honorable and good" but his brain was stuck on stupid for flouting the regulations.