Members banned from this thread: Yakuda


Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 92

Thread: Who's to say? Is there moral truth?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default Who's to say? Is there moral truth?

    So, who’s to say? My answer is ‘nobody’. Not God. Not your culture. Not mine. Not moral gurus. And not – heaven help us! – professional moral philosophers like me. We should resist the assumption that anyone has special unquestionable authority with respect to moral matters.

    Moral questions are not decided by authorities or settled by fiat. Instead, in truth, we’re all sitting around in the moral fog together, trying to muddle through as best we can. Let’s reject ideas that do not stand up to critical scrutiny, regardless of who proposes them.

    https://philosophynow.org/issues/156/Whos_To_Say

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,729 Times in 27,216 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    What is moral?


    Supporting life

    Working to encourage your other world inhabitants to be kind to each other and to live


    Setting up a system that avoids harming others and encourages life


    Morality really isn’t such a big mystery to me

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post


    Morality really isn’t such a big mystery to me
    Which is the problem.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,594
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    So, who’s to say? My answer is ‘nobody’. Not God. Not your culture. Not mine. Not moral gurus. And not – heaven help us! – professional moral philosophers like me. We should resist the assumption that anyone has special unquestionable authority with respect to moral matters.

    Moral questions are not decided by authorities or settled by fiat. Instead, in truth, we’re all sitting around in the moral fog together, trying to muddle through as best we can. Let’s reject ideas that do not stand up to critical scrutiny, regardless of who proposes them.

    https://philosophynow.org/issues/156/Whos_To_Say
    there is no moral fog or ambiguity about what is and isn't moral. morals come from human decency and respect. for example, it is highly immoral to force anyone to submit to another for any reason. it is immoral to take the life of someone who is no threat another being. it is immoral to mistreat or murder another living being that has no voice of their own.

    these have been around since the time that man was created. any body trying to argue differently is just making excuses for their cruelty and seflishness
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    it is highly immoral to force anyone to submit to another for any reason.
    Someone who committed a crime should not submit to arrest by a police officer?

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,594
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Someone who committed a crime should not submit to arrest by a police officer?
    define crime? should anyone be subject to arrest for driving without a license? should anyone be arrested for resisting arrest if there was no other crime that occurred?

    if someone commits a crime that does harm to another, that person then gave up their right to be in control of themselves.

    are you able to see that distinction? or does your low IQ require a manual about humanity?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    does your low IQ require a manual about humanity?
    I am never in the mood to debate people who make personal attacks.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,594
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    I am never in the mood to debate people who make personal attacks.
    and now YOUR hypocrisy is showing ROFL
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    and now YOUR hypocrisy is showing ROFL
    What hypocrisy?

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,481
    Thanks
    4,273
    Thanked 10,239 Times in 7,129 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    So, who’s to say? My answer is ‘nobody’. Not God. Not your culture. Not mine. Not moral gurus. And not – heaven help us! – professional moral philosophers like me. We should resist the assumption that anyone has special unquestionable authority with respect to moral matters.

    Moral questions are not decided by authorities or settled by fiat. Instead, in truth, we’re all sitting around in the moral fog together, trying to muddle through as best we can. Let’s reject ideas that do not stand up to critical scrutiny, regardless of who proposes them.

    https://philosophynow.org/issues/156/Whos_To_Say
    We're probably not even really here- We just think we are.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeko Sportivo View Post
    We're probably not even really here- We just think we are.
    uhhhh ok

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,153
    Thanks
    35,711
    Thanked 50,643 Times in 27,300 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    We should resist the assumption that anyone has special unquestionable authority with respect to moral matters.
    ^Strawman fallacy. Nobody actually believes there's a person like that. Even Catholics defy the dictates of the Pope.



    The fact that the world's religions started to converge towards a sophisticated common ethical framework suggests to me that human free will and conciousness bends towards a natural law that exists above written law.


    Bhagavad-Gita, chapter 16
    Fearlessness, purity of being, knowledge, generosity, discipline, sacrifice, sacred study, austerity, honesty, non-harm, truth, non-anger, letting go, peace, non-slander, kindness to living things, non-greed, gentleness, modesty, non-caprice, energy, forgiveness, resolve, cleanliness, non-aggression, non-arrogance -- those exist in one born to godly assets.

    Zhuangzi:
    Humans who have freed themselves from the slavery of conventional standards of judgement and desire can no longer be made to suffer. So the Daoist remains within society but refrains from acting out of motives that lead conventional humans to struggle for wealth, fame, reputation, success, security. He maintains a course of action that is not purposefully motivated by any gain or reward. In such a state human action becomes spontaneous and effortless. Humans become one with heaven, and merge with the Dao.

    Jesus, Sermon on the Plain:
    Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the Earth. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God. Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the Sons of God. Love your enemies and turn the other cheek. Treat others the way you want to be treated. Don't judge and you won't be judged, don't condemn and you won't be condemned, forgive and you will be forgiven, give and you will receive. Remove the log from your own eye before attending to the splinter in your friend's. A good tree does not produce bad fruit and a bad tree cannot produce good fruit, each tree is known by its fruit.

    Analects of Confucius, Chapter XVI-10:
    Confucius said, “There are nine things upon which a gentleman focuses his attention: in regard to using his eyes, he is anxious to see clearly; when listening, he focuses on being discerning; in his countenance, he is anxious to be amiable; in his demeanor, he focuses on being reverent; in his speech, he focuses on being dutiful; in his actions, he focuses on being respectful; when in doubt, he focuses on asking questions; when angry, he focuses on thinking about the the difficulties he may cause others ; and when he sees gain to be had, he focuses upon righteousness

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    7,864
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 2,154 Times in 1,574 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 156 Times in 143 Posts

    Default

    Morals, values and ethics do not exist, they are a social construct

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinkerpeach View Post
    Morals, values and ethics do not exist, they are a social construct
    Then they exist as social constructs.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,744
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    ^Strawman fallacy. Nobody actually believes there's a person like that. .
    So the entire history of Christianity is a fraud.

Similar Threads

  1. Moral rot of the FBI?
    By Stone in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 333
    Last Post: 09-30-2022, 01:21 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-18-2022, 10:31 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-02-2021, 09:33 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-16-2018, 05:39 PM
  5. APP - Moral question
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-07-2017, 12:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •