See? That's where you are wrong. But it appears you lack the requisite background in QM.
I find it ironic because you seem MASSIVELY well read. But I sense you don't actually SYNTHESIZE information.
You seem to feel like you are seeing so deeply but clearly you don't necessarily understand this particular topic in technical detail. Your points sound like so many new agers, who read something about quantum that is weird and who go off on a tangent decreeing so many deep things which don't necessarily have any meaning. You think you are asking deep questions but I'm challenging that assumption.
Don't get me wrong: I know I'm not that well versed in the intense mathematics of this topic, but you seem even less familiar. The point I raise is very much apropos. Even if YOU don't like it.
THIS TOPIC SPECIFICALLY, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle IS very much a MATHEMATICAL topic. As such to discuss it you MUST understand what the math is telling you. You cannot simply decree whatever new agey blather you like. It is a function of the MATH.
Even Russel started off with simple math and expanded off of it when writing Principia Mathematica.
Bookmarks