Congressional oversight over State Prosecutors?

**floridafan** · 03-31-2023, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

I literally just wrote I dont favor it. What you believe is behind my control so I dont spend much time thinking about it. You should try it sometime.

It is a total joke for Jim Jordan to subpoena anyone, after he and others refused Congressional subpoena's themselves.

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:07 AM

Originally Posted by floridafan

Ok, you are against Mr. Bragg appearing before Congress. Thats very good

Yes because it's a political stunt equal to the indictment. You may think I'm an asshole and I may actually be an asshole and i may consistently be an asshole but I suggest you'd be hard pressed to find where I wasn't consistent in my arguments.

**Jarod** · 03-31-2023, 08:09 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

I literally just wrote I dont favor it. What you believe is behind my control so I dont spend much time thinking about it. You should try it sometime.

Welcome to the fold. I am glad you have joined our team.

**floridafan** · 03-31-2023, 08:10 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

Yes because it's a political stunt equal to the indictment. You may think I'm an asshole and I may actually be an asshole and i may consistently be an asshole but I suggest you'd be hard pressed to find where I wasn't consistent in my arguments.

Howcan you say a 30+ count indictment is a political stunt, when you have no idea what the charges against Trump will be.

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:10 AM

Originally Posted by floridafan

It is a total joke for Jim Jordan to subpoena anyone, after he and others refused Congressional subpoena's themselves.

In all fairness while I disagree with their actions, I understand why people might want to exact a little revenge. It's human nature.

**Jarod** · 03-31-2023, 08:11 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

Yes because it's a political stunt equal to the indictment. You may think I'm an asshole and I may actually be an asshole and i may consistently be an asshole but I suggest you'd be hard pressed to find where I wasn't consistent in my arguments.

So you are supporting Gym Jordan's overreach into State actions?

You are going back and forth!

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:12 AM

Originally Posted by Jarod

Welcome to the fold. I am glad you have joined our team.

No I will never join that team, God forbid, but even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while, so I can't argue. Too bad you dems don't have the same willingness to work with those with whom you disagree.

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:15 AM

Originally Posted by Jarod

So you are supporting Gym Jordan's overreach into State actions?

You are going back and forth!

Are you retarded? I swear that is something wrong with you but I'm going to try Tom understand you. Tell me what I wrote there that led you to that conclusion?

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:16 AM

Originally Posted by floridafan

Howcan you say a 30+ count indictment is a political stunt, when you have no idea what the charges against Trump will be.

It is a political stunt. The number of counts isn't relevant unless you can explain how.

**floridafan** · 03-31-2023, 08:17 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

It is a political stunt. The number of counts isn't relevant unless you can explain how.

Of course the counts are relative, they can involved any number of other criminal acts other than just Stormy Daniels.

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:19 AM

Originally Posted by floridafan

Of course the counts are relative, they can involved any number of other criminal acts other than just Stormy Daniels.

You didn't address my question. Want me to restate what I said?

**floridafan** · 03-31-2023, 08:21 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

You didn't address my question. Want me to restate what I said?

yup!

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:26 AM

Originally Posted by floridafan

yup!

"It is a political stunt. The number of counts isn't relevant unless you can explain how."

The above quote reasserts my claim that this is a political stunt and that the number of counts isn't relevant, not relative, relevant to to whether or not it's a political stunt. So again explain how the number of counts is relevant to whether or not it's a political stunt.

**floridafan** · 03-31-2023, 08:31 AM

Originally Posted by Yakuda

"It is a political stunt. The number of counts isn't relevant unless you can explain how."

The above quote reasserts my claim that this is a political stunt and that the number of counts isn't relevant, not relative, relevant to to whether or not it's a political stunt. So again explain how the number of counts is relevant to whether or not it's a political stunt.

Let's repeat again that you know nothing, about the counts or their severity, so your opinion means little. If this was only about Ms. Daniels and McDougal there wouldn't be this many counts.

**Yakuda** · 03-31-2023, 08:36 AM

Originally Posted by floridafan

Let's repeat again that you know nothing, about the counts or their severity, so your opinion means little. If this was only about Ms. Daniels and McDougal there wouldn't be this many counts.

You're continuing to avoid the question. I never claimed to know the severity of the counts, unless you can show from my words where I made such a claim. Once AGAIN explain how the number of counts is relevant to whether or not this is a political stunt.