Guno צְבִי (03-31-2023), Trumpet (03-31-2023)
Members banned from this thread: SmarterthanYou, Truth Detector, serendipity, MAGA MAN, Sailor, Into the Night, Earl, Stone, ExpressLane, Matt Dillon, Yakuda, Lionfish and Theywillneverlearn! |
Turns out there was a reason behind why Disney seemingly gave in so readily to the little toad DeSewerRat's political revenge stunt.
As the day was approaching for DeScumbag to sign the law dissolving and replacing RCID, Disney and RCID got together and entered into a legal, contractual agreement that gives all development oversight on the property to the Disney corporation for the next 30 YEARS.
Aside from one or two minor clauses that might be challenged, overall the agreement is a PERFECTLY LEGAL CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT.
Disney to DeShitbag ---->
Power play: Disney handicapped new Reedy Creek board before handing over control
In their final days of controlling the Reedy Creek improvement district’s board, Disney executives and attorneys found a way to poison the authority of the incoming members appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and effectively oversee the area’s development.
On Feb. 8, 2023, as the Florida House was passing legislation to give DeSantis his new power, Reedy Creek’s board members signed a development agreement with the company that allowed Disney maximum developmental power over its territory for the next 30 years.
According to the new board members, who are now known as the Central Florida Tourism Oversight board, and their attorneys, Disney is allowed the maximum possible density and building heights inside Walt Disney World. Other property owners will need Disney’s permission to expand within the district, and they and Reedy Creek leaders will need to seek Disney’s approval if they made any aesthetic changes to their properties within the district.
The district is also not allowed to permit advertisements of any companies that compete with ones that operate within Reedy Creek, board members said
"We lose control over everything other than to maintain the roads and maintain the infrastructure,” one board member said.
Board members said they found out about the agreement after their appointments.
Both they and their newly appointed attorneys called the agreement various synonyms of insane and extreme, and said its sheer scale should make it null and void.
Particular focus was paid to one section that board members said places certain restrictions on the district until 21 years after the death of the last surviving descendant of King Charles, or until Disney abandons the resort.
“We gave governmental control to Disney,” Brian Aungst summarized.
Other board members were harsher in their assessment.
Board members hired multiple politically-connected law firms to represent them and analyze the agreement, and discussed bringing on as many as four different firms to battle the deep-pocketed company as they attempted to unwind it. Garcia referenced taking it all the way to the United States Supreme Court if necessary.
Some board members said they hoped Disney executives and attorneys would be willing to come to the table and reach a compromise agreement before any legal steps were taken, though others weren’t as optimistic.
"All agreements signed between Disney and the District were appropriate, and were discussed and approved in open, noticed public forums in compliance with Florida’s Government in the Sunshine law,” a spokesperson said.
An independent attorney who specializes in government law analyzed the agreement Wednesday morning. Upon initial review, the attorney said the agreement appeared to be valid.
“I’m struggling to find a reason why it’s unlawful,” the attorney said, noting the type of agreement struck was normal between large developers and governments, it was properly noticed and Reedy Creek’s leadership willingly entered into it.
In a follow-up conversation Wednesday night after additional review of the documents, the attorney agreed with the board that the separate covenant restrictions Reedy Creek agreed to that last until the king’s descendant dies were unusual and potentially illegal.
The attorney cautioned they could not predict a judge’s interpretation of the law but said the agreement would likely be fought in federal courts, which would be viewed as friendlier to Disney than the DeSantis-influenced Florida justice system.
They also said Reedy Creek and Florida lawmakers could run into constitutional issues if they tried to undo the agreement since governments can’t impair existing contracts.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/power-pla...181501620.html
C'MON MAN!!!!
Guno צְבִי (03-31-2023), Trumpet (03-31-2023)
OMG, so DeScumbuckey's isn't all powerful.
Lock Him Up
Guno צְבִי (03-31-2023), Nomad (03-31-2023)
“If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”
— Golda Meir
Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.
ברוך השם
Nomad (03-31-2023)
C'MON MAN!!!!
Guno צְבִי (03-31-2023), Trumpet (03-31-2023)
Bookmarks