Democrats and their lie about free speech.

[Flash]

Another falsehood.
Requiring social media sites to not discriminate due to political opinion is well within the authority of the federal government. See the 1st and 14th amendments.

Nope. It says NO LAW that abridges free speech which makes such a law unconstitutional but the courts have no jurisdiction over free speech of private entities.

[Into the Night]

Nope. It says NO LAW that abridges free speech which makes such a law unconstitutional but the courts have no jurisdiction over free speech of private entities.

Requiring sites to not discriminate due to political opinion is not abridging free speech. It is enhancing it, dumbass. The Federal government has all the authority it needs to pass such laws.
Courts DO have authority over private entities that are breaking the law.

[IBDaMann]

Requiring sites to not discriminate due to political opinion is not abridging free speech. It is enhancing it, dumbass. The Federal government has all the authority it needs to pass such laws.
Courts DO have authority over private entities that are breaking the law.

Can the federal government prohibit landlords from discriminating against, and not renting to, people based on their political views?

Let me see. Yes, it appears that the federal government can and does prohibit that. I guess you're right.

[Flash]

Requiring sites to not discriminate due to political opinion is not abridging free speech. It is enhancing it, dumbass. The Federal government has all the authority it needs to pass such laws.
Courts DO have authority over private entities that are breaking the law.

The federal government cannot make laws interfering with free speech and free press. It does not enhance free speech/press for the federal government to tell a private business what it can allow or not allow. That is the essence of government tyranny.

They can prevent a business/government from discriminating against a person for his political views. It cannot require any entity to allow speech for which it does not agree. Any law telling a private business what speech it can allow or prohibit is unconstitutional.

What law are you claiming they violated?