Well we got this week’s school shooting in the books early

[martin]

Hmmm... how should I put this so that you will either participate in the conversation or scroll by?

Simple response: No.

Explanation: I feel that expressing an opinion on a site created to express opinions is actually doing what we come here to do.

Conclusion: If you don't like what I say, tell me why you don't like it rather than powerlessly trying to order folks around without being able to provide consequences for your insistence that I act as you want me to act.

Fair reply. I’ll alter mine to say that imposing your politically imagined expectation on a future event says nothing about the event but merely holds up a mirror to you.

[Damocles]

Fair reply. I’ll alter mine to say that imposing your politically imagined expectation on a future event says nothing about the event but merely holds up a mirror to you.

This is not a future event and does not reflect my opinion on much other than the narratives proffered by news sources. The opinions which you seem insistent to "thrust" upon others is the mirror, but not to the folks to which you assign the opinions.

[martin]

This is not a future event and does not reflect my opinion on much other than the narratives proffered by news sources. The opinions which you seem insistent to "thrust" upon others is the mirror, but not to the folks to which you assign the opinions.

What I responded to was your ill informed predictions of how the news media will continue to respond to the story based on future developments; in other words, “a future event” and reflection of your opinion.

[christiefan915]

You jumped right on it, though, didn't you? I'm not sure what time this happened but I hadn't even heard it mentioned yet ...So whats the point of posting this other than not letting a good tragedy go to waste ? And then you were asked a question...what's your answer?

Well you better rush on over to the threads posted by people on your side and read them the riot act, because otherwise you're a hypocrite.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ld-Audrey-Hale

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...l-a-hate-crime

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-6-is-a-TRANNY!!!

[christiefan915]

So how would you have prevented it? And the rest of your comment just proves that you are only here so that a good tragedy doesn't go to waste... so I was correct... thanks for the confirmation...

You're so two-faced it makes me gag; me and other people, too.

[Grokmaster]

”Multiple victims reported in shooting at Nashville school; shooter dead”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nashvil...venant-school/

School shootings have become as American as apple pie, happen so often, Americans have become desensitized to them, and the right’s solution is more guns, and more “freedom” for the shooters

I hadn't heard that the "GUN" walked into the school and started shooting on its own.

[christiefan915]

It should... but read the OP... I doubt the parents of the children killed would appreciate the death of their children being mocked... you mocked the tragedy as well.. (I see the White House is already blaming Republicans..)

^ Hypocrisy on steroids. Three other cons posted threads on this and you ignored them.

[christiefan915]

What? You know that makes no sense...

It makes sense to people who have cognition.

[SmarterthanYou]

“knee jerk reaction,” wanting to do something to end kids getting shot in school is a “knee jerk reaction”

the fault lies with you. you use emotional arguments 'kids' to pursue your agenda of peaceful slavery. we all know you don't believe in freedom and you're quite willing to surrender the rights of others to achieve it. It's why you equate freedom to a bumper sticker cliche and that all rights can be regulated. you discard all of the founding fathers thoughts and ideas in favor of government defining it's own restrictions. you prefer safety to liberty. you prefer permissions to rights. in short, you're anti american.

[Earl]

Opposing basic laws that would reduce this type of murder is crude and rude.

Denying citizens the means to protect themselves when attacked would increase the murder of them.

You can’t accept the fact that you loons lost the Heller vs. DC. decision.

The Constitution prevails and so does the Second Amendment.

[Earl]

I hadn't heard that the "GUN" walked into the school and started shooting on its own.

Indeed.

These far left Democratic Socialist loons appear to believe that guns are not inanimate objects.

The thugs who use guns illegally should be banned but the left does not even want to prosecute them.

[Yakuda]

Indeed.

These far left Democratic Socialist loons appear to believe that guns are not inanimate objects.

The thugs who use guns illegally should be banned but the left does not even want to prosecute them.

Correct. They think the shooter was the victim of an oppressive white patriarchy and just couldn't take it anymore. Leftists seem to honestly believe any action taken in the destruction of isms, phobias and ologies they dont like is completely justified.

[Earl]

I have guns, I don’t want guns banned… I want the manufacture sale and import of some guns illegal.

Then amend the Constitution or have a Constitutional Convention.

You best bring your lunch, it will be an all day job.

[Jarod]

Denying citizens the means to protect themselves when attacked would increase the murder of them.

.

Simply not supported by the facts. People can defend themselves without AR-15, which are used to kill more kids than they defend.

[Geeko Sportivo]

So what do you propose to prevent this in the future?

We may have to start preventing RIGHT-WING nuts like you from buying guns!