You are a dick.
No.You didn't say that chemistry used quantum concepts. Though I can understand why you would want to backtrack and modify your original assertion.
And I stand by it. Why do you think I taught you chemistry here.You said that quantum mechanics was the very heart of the science of chemistry.
All I need to know I now know. You never had a chemistry class. Or if you did it was so remedial as to be less than a high school class.Other than presenting students with the (technically incorrect) Bohr model of the atom, introductory college chemistry classes deal with quantum mechanics in a very superficial way, and they certainly don't do anymore than lip service at best to most basic quantum concepts, which are covered with much more rigour and depth in physics classes.
My challenge to you again is to contact ten universities, and tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and then observe if they refer you to the physics department or the biogeochem department
That means you didn't get a geology degree anytime in the last 50-70 years.
Ergo: you are lying about having a geology degree.
QED.
All the bloviating, internet research, plagiarism, and paraphrasing you do doesn't distract from this simple experimental challenge:
Starting today, I challenge you to contact ten universities, tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and then observe how all ten schools will refer you to their physics departments.
If QM really were the heart and core of the science of chemistry, this experiment should show whether your claim was true or false.
No, it shows that you lied about having a glorious 'biogeochem' PhD, and you may not have even had introductory chemistry.
The introductory Chemistry textbook I looked at yesterday, and the one I had in college had maybe about 30 pages out of more than one thousand pages directly dealing with quantum mechanics (mainly just the Bohr model of the atom). Wave particle duality was mentioned only in passing and in the most cursory way. And many fundamental quantum concepts were completely absent.
You claimed that QM was the very heart and core of the science of chemistry.
You didn't say that chemistry merely used some QM concepts. Cell phones use QM concepts too.
You have never had a chemistry class. Ergo you are not a geologist. Ergo you are a liar.
(If you had to go online to find a chem textbook it means you don't have one of your own which, again, means you ain't much of a scientist. The fact that you had to verify it for yourself NOW instead of knowing because you had a chem class is all I needed to know. You are a lying sack of shit).
Your challenge is stupid. It's because you don't know what you are talking about here. Yes QM has a significant part of physics but it is the core of chemistry. The fact that you don't know this is all I need to know how little chemistry you have had. And because I actually DO have a geology degree I know you have to have chemistry to get one. So I know you are a liar.
So far on this thread I've been the only one to post any science. All you ever do is whine.
All I need to know.
Poser.
Into the Night (03-20-2023)
Or actually know the stuff. But your ego is so fragile you cannot imagine someone would know this stuff.
Is that why you never post anything of any scientific value?The rest of us are writing our own words based on our own acquired innate knowledge.
I am onto your game now, fraud. I know you for what you are. You are a poser. Fake geophysicist. LOL. (Next time try choosing a degree you can actually fake your way through when online)
Into the Night (03-20-2023)
Frantically googling tidbits of scientific information off the cuff to plagiarize and paraphrase a response on a message board is not a good way to learn science.
A proper depth and scope of a basic working knowledge of the sciences requires hard work and commitment.
Paraphrasing what you found on Wikipedia, and passing it off as your own words is not a sign of scientific literacy and competency.
Not to mention, lying about a glorious 'biogeochem' PhD is just flagrantly dishonest.
Into the Night (03-20-2023)
Cypress and Perry should post images of their credentials with their names blacked out to solve this argument.
In fact if only one did it and not the other that would solve it too.
Otherwise this is nothing more than a pissing contest.
Would be interesting.
I know all I need to know now. You don't know any chemistry. Ergo you didn't get a geology degree. Ergo you are a lying sack of shit.
You know at one point I actually kinda believed you might be a geologist. Now I know better. You don't even know basic chemistry they teach high school kids, let alone college kids.
I took two semesters of PChem sometime last century, forgot it all , so I can’t tell which of you are bullshitting (although you seem legit).
The majority that post here never even had freshman chemistry so they don’t have a clue what you two are talking about.
Ergo, you two are wasting your time, a pissing contest.
Bookmarks