Page 27 of 43 FirstFirst ... 1723242526272829303137 ... LastLast
Results 391 to 405 of 640

Thread: JPP Experts

  1. #391 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    You said quantum mechanics was the "heart" of the science of chemistry.

    Nobody who supposedly has a "biogeochem" PhD would write that.

    Chemistry is first and foremost, all about the valence shell electrons, and the reactions and bonds that result from the valence state.

    Here's a project for you: starting Monday morning, call ten different universities, and assuming you get someone who knows what they're doing, tell them you want to get a graduate degree in quantum mechanics.

    All ten universities are going to ultimately refer you to their physics department, not their chemistry or 'biogeochem' department
    What do you think an orbital is???????

  2. #392 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    Just to be clear it isn't some "official chemical definition", it's more of a descriptor. Like I said it is often necessary to know if the carbon you are measuring is from an organic material like a kerogen or a bitumen etc. or if is from CaCO3 (calcium carbonate, eg limestone etc.).

    That's the reason for the designation. Otherwise you are 100% correct that all carbon is just plain ol' carbon. This is an "accounting" type of measurement. Where is the carbon you are measuring coming from?



    My pleasure.



    No, it simply helps establish that the concept of "organic carbon" is well known in the field.



    Umm, you were wrong then. The author is, indeed, telling you about where petroleum comes from. It comes from the diagenetic and catagenetic alteration of vegetal/algal/bacterial sources buried deeply and exposed to both aerobic and anaerobic conditions as well as heat. The reference to Tissot and Welte in the first paragraph is a good one. That was a major resource for me when I was learning organic geochem. The Tissot Diagram is actually a great "summary":

    (SOURCE)

    This basically shows you how various organics are formed in the geologic setting. The X-axis tells you about Oxygen/Carbon ratios and the Y-Axis shows you H/C ratios the "paths" show what happens to these ratios as you increase temperature (the dashed lines are "vitrinite reflectance" values which are a proxy for temperature as measured by the reflectance of coal macerals called "vitrinites"). As you increase temperature you see a steady decline in both O and H as these are volatilized away as the carbon is altered. The three "branches" you see relate to the type of organic material. You can also see in the side-graphs where petroleum forms vs where gas forms etc.

    This is kind of the core of organic geochemistry.



    No prob.
    Carbon isn't organic.
    You completely ignore the Fischer-Tropsche process.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  3. #393 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,476
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,699 Times in 2,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    Umm, you were wrong then.
    One of us is definitely wrong, and it's not me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    The author is, indeed, telling you about where petroleum comes from.
    Nope. He is regurgitating a common laymen's misconception. Chemists know how hydrocarbons form. It would seem that many geologists never got the memo and blunder through life thinking that hydrocarbons form from previous organic matter.

    This is not the case. If you are operating under this embarrassing misconception, I would make it a priority to ditch it for the correct understanding.

    1. Hydrocarbons form much deeper in the crust, in massive quantities, from natural geological activity, from regular carbon and hydrogen, with a metal catalyst, whenever the conditions for the Fischer-Tropsch process exist.

    2. Hydrocarbons form in a matter of hours, not millions of years. They form under conditions of elevated temperatures and pressures which ELEVATE the level of chemical energy, which is why they make such awesome fuels. Hydrocarbons are the Earth's best renewable source of energy.

    3. Hydrocarbons, once produced by the geological activity described above, rise towards the surface until they encounter impermeable rock and cannot proceed further, thus accumulating into a well. This places hydrocarbon wells BELOW impermeable rock where no organic matter ever reached.

    4. The above has long-since been verified by petroleum companies who, after tapping wells dry and capping them, simply wait for them to refill. Then off comes the cap and pumping resumes. Note: millions of years are not needed for wells to refill.

    5. Where there are gaps in the impermeable rock, such as in the Gulf of Mexico, the hydrocarbons rise to the surface. Petroleum companies know where to build their offshore platforms by observing where the hydrocarbons are emerging from the sea floor.

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    It comes from the diagenetic and catagenetic alteration of vegetal/algal/bacterial sources buried deeply and exposed to both aerobic and anaerobic conditions as well as heat.
    Nope. No biological matter is involved. There is nothing preventing you from making any hydrocarbons you want in your garage provided you have the right equipment, some hydrogen, some carbon and the right catalyst (metal). No organic anything will be needed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    This is kind of the core of organic geochemistry.
    It would appear that "geochemistry" teaches a long-held religious dogma that has long since been debunked.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44OU4JxEK4k&t=3s

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=prtmNHkbtYQ

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-I_UtU7zYs0&t=4s

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=To_RJ_mPNqM&t=57s

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to IBDaMann For This Post:

    Into the Night (03-19-2023)

  5. #394 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    What do you think an orbital is???????
    So you're not really a 'biogeochem' PhD, are you.

    You wrote quantum mechanics was the "Heart" of the science of chemistry. Not that there were a couple lectures on it in freshman chemistry.

    There is usually never anything more than a passing discussion of wave particle duality and the quantum wave function in introductory chemistry and organic chemistry.

    Hey dummy, most of the orbitals aren't involved in chemical reactions, or covalent bonds and ionic bonds. Chemical reaction and bonding is all about the valence shell electrons and filling up the octet in the valence shell to achieve electrical neutrality. Chemistry, first and foremost is the study of reactions and bonds between atoms and molecules based on valence state.

    I leave my standing challenge for you: call ten different universities, tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and observe how all the universities will refer you to their physics department, not chemistry department.

  6. #395 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    You wrote quantum mechanics was the "Heart" of the science of chemistry. Not that there were a couple lectures on it in freshman chemistry.
    I know you are a lying sack of shit but please, open a chemistry book. Look up "orbital". That's QM. Orbitals are how we understand electrons. Electrons are how elements bond. Bonds are the core of chemistry.

    It is all QM. Even bonded they form molecular orbitals which are QM.

    I don't know what you think chemistry is but you don't seem to have ever taken a class in it.

    There is usually never anything more than a passing discussion of wave particle duality and the quantum wave function in introductory chemistry and organic chemistry.
    THAT IS A LIE. Wow. The lie of all lies. We spend days, weeks, months of lecture on the orbitals. Orbitals are the solutions to the Schroedinger Equation. It don't get more QM than that.

    Hey dummy, most of the orbitals aren't involved in chemical reactions, or covalent bonds and ionic bonds.
    The valence ones sure as fuck are.

    And the non-valence electrons also help define the CHEMICAL FEATURES. The size of the atom, the charge/size ratio. This all impacts how elements bond. Remember talking about Si based life? You didn't understand why Si doesn't self-catenate like C does even though both have the same valence configuration. The difference is in the size of the atom. Si has an additional level so the atom is a different size and the bonds it forms differ from C. But both have a 4 electron valence shell.

    I am starting to get a clearer picture of your failure in this end of science. You simply didn't have any chemistry classes at all.


    Chemical reaction and bonding is all about the valence shell electrons and filling up the octet in the valence shell
    Good googling again. Kudos on "octet". But you should also realize there are "expanded valence shells" like in P or S which have more than an octet. But the point is that "octet" is really just the s and p orbitals filling up. 8= 2 s and 6p electrons. It gets more complex when you have d orbitals or f-orbitals which have many more electrons. The whole point being that those s and p and d and f orbitals are quantum mechanics. And when you fill those orbitals remember Hund's rule? Yeah, the SPIN of the electrons has to be paired. That's QM again. 100% QM right down the line. You surely remember how to fill the p orbitals right?

    I leave my standing challenge for you: call ten different universities, tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and observe how all the universities will refer you to their physics department, not chemistry department.
    I challenge you to open a chemistry text book. Try learning this stuff.

  7. #396 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
    One of us is definitely wrong, and it's not me.


    Nope. He is regurgitating a common laymen's misconception. Chemists know how hydrocarbons form. It would seem that many geologists never got the memo and blunder through life thinking that hydrocarbons form from previous organic matter.

    This is not the case. If you are operating under this embarrassing misconception, I would make it a priority to ditch it for the correct understanding.

    1. Hydrocarbons form much deeper in the crust, in massive quantities, from natural geological activity, from regular carbon and hydrogen, with a metal catalyst, whenever the conditions for the Fischer-Tropsch process exist.

    2. Hydrocarbons form in a matter of hours, not millions of years. They form under conditions of elevated temperatures and pressures which ELEVATE the level of chemical energy, which is why they make such awesome fuels. Hydrocarbons are the Earth's best renewable source of energy.

    3. Hydrocarbons, once produced by the geological activity described above, rise towards the surface until they encounter impermeable rock and cannot proceed further, thus accumulating into a well. This places hydrocarbon wells BELOW impermeable rock where no organic matter ever reached.

    4. The above has long-since been verified by petroleum companies who, after tapping wells dry and capping them, simply wait for them to refill. Then off comes the cap and pumping resumes. Note: millions of years are not needed for wells to refill.

    5. Where there are gaps in the impermeable rock, such as in the Gulf of Mexico, the hydrocarbons rise to the surface. Petroleum companies know where to build their offshore platforms by observing where the hydrocarbons are emerging from the sea floor.


    Nope. No biological matter is involved. There is nothing preventing you from making any hydrocarbons you want in your garage provided you have the right equipment, some hydrogen, some carbon and the right catalyst (metal). No organic anything will be needed.


    It would appear that "geochemistry" teaches a long-held religious dogma that has long since been debunked.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44OU4JxEK4k&t=3s

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=prtmNHkbtYQ

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-I_UtU7zYs0&t=4s

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=To_RJ_mPNqM&t=57s
    I will recommend you look up something called "biomarkers". Oil contains a lot of biomarkers indicative of a photosynthetic source, eg algae. Porphyrin rings and pristane/phytane ratios all point to where it comes from.

    The amount of organic material made in the deep crust through just cobbling together small organic molecules is vanishingly small and would result only in small molecules for the most part. Certainly wouldn't spontaneously form things which are EXACTLY LIKE CHLOROPHYLL Chunks which is what porphyrin rings are. That's why we know where oil comes from.

    Even the "deep hot biosphere" can't explain the presence of these chlorophyll-derived biomarkers. One of the key biomarkers for estimating maturity of the oil is "pristane/phytane ratio". These are long tailed hydrocarbons which cleave off of chlorophyll molecules and break down in a predictable fashion.

    And, finally, the carbon isotopes are more akin to vegetal sources. Rich in 12-C vs 13-C because plants and algae naturally fractionate more 12-C than 13-C. That's why we can even see that fingerprint in atmospheric CO2. We know that burning coal and oil pumps a lot more 12-C into the atmosphere and we even see an increase over the last 150 years in 12-C content of atmospheric CO2.

  8. #397 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,476
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,699 Times in 2,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Chemistry, first and foremost, is the study of the reactions and nature of bonds between atoms and molecules based on their valence shell electron state.
    You can't say this.

    Chemistry is the science of matter, period. Tomorrow our existing models of bonds between atoms and molecules might be falsified and replaced with different models. Chemistry will remain the science of matter, whatever the existing models might be.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    The quantum properties of fundamental particles like leptons, quarks, and the rest of the particle zoo is firmly is within the project of physics.
    Sure, but they are highly speculative ... in science terminology we say "purely theoretical." Anyone might be falsifying them tomorrow. Anyone is welcome to use his own conceptual models and notation if it helps.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    If you contacted a university and told them you wanted to do a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, 99 times out of 100 they would refer you to the physics department.
    Not likely. They would tell you that they can offer you a degree in physics or a degree in math, and that you would have to choose which one you wanted, but that you would just need to include a certain concentration in statistical math and a course or two in quantum physics in the physics department.
    Global Warming violates the 1st LoT by claiming a magical creation of thermal energy out of nothing, in the form of a temperature increase, which is somehow caused by a magical substance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates Stefan-Boltzmann and black body science by claiming that an increase in earth's temperature is somehow caused by a decrease in earth's radiance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates the 2nd LoT by claiming that the cooler atmosphere somehow heats the warmer earth's surface.

  9. #398 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
    You can't say this.

    Chemistry is the science of matter, period. Tomorrow our existing models of bonds between atoms and molecules might be falsified and replaced with different models. Chemistry will remain the science of matter, whatever the existing models might be.
    Geology is also the science of matter. Nice try.

  10. #399 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    I know you are a lying sack of shit but please, open a chemistry book. Look up "orbital". That's QM. Orbitals are how we understand electrons. Electrons are how elements bond. Bonds are the core of chemistry.

    It is all QM. Even bonded they form molecular orbitals which are QM.

    I don't know what you think chemistry is but you don't seem to have ever taken a class in it.



    THAT IS A LIE. Wow. The lie of all lies. We spend days, weeks, months of lecture on the orbitals. Orbitals are the solutions to the Schroedinger Equation. It don't get more QM than that.



    The valence ones sure as fuck are.

    And the non-valence electrons also help define the CHEMICAL FEATURES. The size of the atom, the charge/size ratio. This all impacts how elements bond. Remember talking about Si based life? You didn't understand why Si doesn't self-catenate like C does even though both have the same valence configuration. The difference is in the size of the atom. Si has an additional level so the atom is a different size and the bonds it forms differ from C. But both have a 4 electron valence shell.

    I am starting to get a clearer picture of your failure in this end of science. You simply didn't have any chemistry classes at all.




    Good googling again. Kudos on "octet". But you should also realize there are "expanded valence shells" like in P or S which have more than an octet. But the point is that "octet" is really just the s and p orbitals filling up. 8= 2 s and 6p electrons. It gets more complex when you have d orbitals or f-orbitals which have many more electrons. The whole point being that those s and p and d and f orbitals are quantum mechanics. And when you fill those orbitals remember Hund's rule? Yeah, the SPIN of the electrons has to be paired. That's QM again. 100% QM right down the line. You surely remember how to fill the p orbitals right?



    I challenge you to open a chemistry text book. Try learning this stuff.
    Looks like I got you frantically googling again.

    The only poster who has been caught red handed googling and stealing language for other sources is you. I haven't used Google one single time on this thread.

    Other than the Bohr model of the atom (which technically isn't even correct from a quantum perspective), there is only passing discussion, if that, of wave particle duality, the dual split experiment, quantum chromodynamics, quantum wave collapse, quantum entanglement in introductory chemistry and organic chemistry.

    The fact that you claimed quantum mechanics is the very heart of the science of chemistry was your biggest red flag yet that your 'biogeochem' PhD is a figment of your imagination.

  11. #400 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,546
    Thanks
    3,865
    Thanked 12,030 Times in 8,285 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,673 Times in 2,479 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
    When leftists shout "education!" they mean "indoctrination of our children into Marxism so we can easily control the next generation!" which of course has no value to anyone except to the leftists shouting "education!" When leftists shout "Support our children!" they mean "Give more power to the teachers' union and alleviate their debilitating accountability to parents for results!"

    "Education" is the left's euphemism for "fascism."

    Maybe when Into the Night offers to teach you something, you should consider checking your hatred for learning at the door and take some notes. You might find it useful not being as stupid as a 25-lb bag of compost.
    Wow, the people who want to shutdown schools, and burn books want to teach me something. The sad part is that IB does not realize how pathetic he sounds.
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan said it best, "You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts."
    Paul Begala, "Politics is show business for ugly people."
    Stephen Colbert, "Reality has a well known liberal bias."

  12. #401 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,546
    Thanks
    3,865
    Thanked 12,030 Times in 8,285 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,673 Times in 2,479 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Well, I'm not an electrical engineer. Instead, I'm the guy that calls up the electrical engineer that made the print I'm looking at and tells him "What the fuck were you thinking? This screwed up worse than a soup sandwich! It's gonna be a sea of red fucking ink by the time I get this shit installed. Fuck you very much you goddamned retard!"
    Not quite sure you know what an Electrical Engineer is.
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan said it best, "You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts."
    Paul Begala, "Politics is show business for ugly people."
    Stephen Colbert, "Reality has a well known liberal bias."

  13. #402 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,476
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,699 Times in 2,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    I will recommend you look up something called "biomarkers".
    That's more church material. You are avoiding the Fischer-Trosch process because you know what it will do to your faith. Science has that effect. I feel for you. Those with the strongest religious faiths are those whose faiths permit the pursuit of science. To that end, I would recommend you have a conversation with Into the Night and gfm7175 and find out how they do it. I can't help you in that area because I'm an atheist, so I don't ever face that challenge.

    When the day comes that you are ready to break free from the bonds of your political and religious servitude to Global Warming, Climate Change and their Marxist administrators, I'll be happy to explain to you how the push to get away from hydrocarbons, earth's best renewable energy resource, is damaging to world economies and is really just a stupid idea being pushed by people who basically hate humanity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    Oil contains a lot of biomarkers
    There is no such thing ... outside of your faith, that is. If I were to show you hydrocarbons produced in a lab from no organic material, your religion would nonetheless force you to "see" biomarkers that naturally are not there.

    Ditching a religion isn't easy, is it? Especially when people you trusted implicitly were actually indoctrinating you into that faith over many years by telling you that the religion is NOT a religion, but is actually "settled science."

    I never let anyone do my thinking for me. I never let anyone bend me over furniture and ream disinformation into me.
    Global Warming violates the 1st LoT by claiming a magical creation of thermal energy out of nothing, in the form of a temperature increase, which is somehow caused by a magical substance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates Stefan-Boltzmann and black body science by claiming that an increase in earth's temperature is somehow caused by a decrease in earth's radiance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates the 2nd LoT by claiming that the cooler atmosphere somehow heats the warmer earth's surface.

  14. #403 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Geology is also the science of matter. Nice try.
    It comes down to a difference in scale. Physics is the study of fundamental particles at the quantum scale, biology is the study of cells, populations, and ecological systems, and chemistry falls somewhere in between as the study of molecules and atoms, their bonds and reactions.

    There is naturally always a bit of overlap.

    But I've sat through introductory inorganic chemistry, biochemistry, and a bit of organic chemistry, and other than the Bohr model of the atom (which technically isn't even correct from a quantum perspective), there is only passing discussion, if that, of wave particle duality, the dual split experiment, quantum chromodynamics, quantum wave collapse, quantum entanglement.

    Quantum mechanics just isn't dealt with in any kind of depth in the those types of chemistry classes.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    AProudLefty (03-19-2023)

  16. #404 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,476
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,699 Times in 2,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    Not quite sure you know what an Electrical Engineer is.
    Shall we explore why you are not sure? Yes, we shall.

    Possibilities:
    1. You don't know what an electrical engineer is, so you can't be sure whether anyone else does either.
    2. You can't read T.A. Gardner's posts and thus you aren't sure what was actually written.
    3. Stephen Colbert hasn't bent you over furniture and told you what to believe.
    4. Since you don't know what a fact is, you presume that you must first approve what others are claiming for them to claim it.

    Are there others I have missed?
    Global Warming violates the 1st LoT by claiming a magical creation of thermal energy out of nothing, in the form of a temperature increase, which is somehow caused by a magical substance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates Stefan-Boltzmann and black body science by claiming that an increase in earth's temperature is somehow caused by a decrease in earth's radiance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates the 2nd LoT by claiming that the cooler atmosphere somehow heats the warmer earth's surface.

  17. #405 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Looks like I got you frantically googling again.
    Prove it.

    Other than the Bohr model of the atom (which technically isn't even correct from a quantum perspective), there is only passing discussion, if that, of wave particle duality, the dual split experiment, quantum chromodynamics, quantum wave collapse, quantum entanglement in introductory chemistry and organic chemistry.
    Wow. You haven't had much chemistry.

    The fact that you claimed quantum mechanics is the very heart of the science of chemistry was your biggest red flag yet that your 'biogeochem' PhD is a figment of your imagination.
    What do you think orbitals are?????

Similar Threads

  1. Take It From The Experts
    By Flanders in forum Political - NSFW
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-16-2021, 06:29 PM
  2. The experts are on your side
    By Hermes Thoth in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-28-2020, 04:40 PM
  3. Where would we be without all these experts?
    By ray9 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-15-2020, 04:49 PM
  4. Actual Experts
    By Cancel 2016.11 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 03:48 AM
  5. I believe whatever the UN experts say
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-2011, 08:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •