Page 26 of 43 FirstFirst ... 1622232425262728293036 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 390 of 640

Thread: JPP Experts

  1. #376 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    No. Your religion is full of shit like this. Carbon isn't organic. It's an element.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  2. #377 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    Here's why you are a dishonest piece of shit:

    You complain when people post technical stuff you don't understand. You have to go to google and then you think EVERYONE is googling like you are. So when someone TRIES to find something that CAN'T be googled you complain that it is beneath you.

    You are a dishonest piece of shit.

    And if you actually ARE a scientist you probably suck so bad you are a detriment. Anyone who can't understand basic and simple logic tests is probably not useful in the field.


    And while many of the mouthbreathers on here don't know any better, you and I both know the truth. . (But since you are so dishonest you will never admit it.)
    You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  3. #378 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    LOL. Why don't you shut up, Sybil.
    Why don't you stop making shit up about yourself?

    Oh...I already know why.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  4. #379 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Why don't you stop making shit up about yourself?

    Oh...I already know why.

  5. #380 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    No. Your religion is full of shit like this. Carbon isn't organic. It's an element.
    I love how you just ignore stuff that doesn't comport with your views. LOL.

    But then you don't really understand any of this stuff. You're probably as poorly educated as Cypress!

  6. #381 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    He certainly can be. I tend to like his dry sense of humor. You, on the other hand, are boring. Your religion is known to both of us. We've heard it all before.

  7. #382 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,467
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,696 Times in 2,028 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    I appreciate your post. You and I have something to discuss.

    First, thank you for the references. They gave me a lot to think about.

    The first reference makes a solid case to me for having a seemingly contradictory term, i.e.organic carbon. The context is the industry that cares about the source of the carbon and needs a term that doesn't take a full sentence to express. OK, I get it. The example measurements give a big picture overview of reasons one might need to know the source of carbon and the fact that we're talking about commercial products that measure and filter for labs indicates a valid, commercial use ... so I'm sold.

    You are the first person to bring this explanation to my attention. Thank you.

    You screwed up with the second reference, however. I imagine that you were searching for titles with "organic carbon" in the title, found one and included it, perhaps without having read it. The author, Daniel M Jarvie, is a scheister who doesn't understand how hydrocarbons form in the earth and who doesn't understand the Fischer-Tropsch process, but is nonetheless pretending that oil companies and geologists search for oil based on egregious laymen's misconceptions. I stopped reading after a few sentences.

    Your first reference was sufficient and I thank you for it.

  8. #383 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
    The first reference makes a solid case to me for having a seemingly contradictory term, i.e.organic carbon.
    Just to be clear it isn't some "official chemical definition", it's more of a descriptor. Like I said it is often necessary to know if the carbon you are measuring is from an organic material like a kerogen or a bitumen etc. or if is from CaCO3 (calcium carbonate, eg limestone etc.).

    That's the reason for the designation. Otherwise you are 100% correct that all carbon is just plain ol' carbon. This is an "accounting" type of measurement. Where is the carbon you are measuring coming from?

    You are the first person to bring this explanation to my attention. Thank you.
    My pleasure.

    You screwed up with the second reference, however. I imagine that you were searching for titles with "organic carbon" in the title, found one and included it, perhaps without having read it.
    No, it simply helps establish that the concept of "organic carbon" is well known in the field.

    The author, Daniel M Jarvie, is a scheister who doesn't understand how hydrocarbons form in the earth and who doesn't understand the Fischer-Tropsch process, but is nonetheless pretending that oil companies and geologists search for oil based on egregious laymen's misconceptions. I stopped reading after a few sentences.
    Umm, you were wrong then. The author is, indeed, telling you about where petroleum comes from. It comes from the diagenetic and catagenetic alteration of vegetal/algal/bacterial sources buried deeply and exposed to both aerobic and anaerobic conditions as well as heat. The reference to Tissot and Welte in the first paragraph is a good one. That was a major resource for me when I was learning organic geochem. The Tissot Diagram is actually a great "summary":

    (SOURCE)

    This basically shows you how various organics are formed in the geologic setting. The X-axis tells you about Oxygen/Carbon ratios and the Y-Axis shows you H/C ratios the "paths" show what happens to these ratios as you increase temperature (the dashed lines are "vitrinite reflectance" values which are a proxy for temperature as measured by the reflectance of coal macerals called "vitrinites"). As you increase temperature you see a steady decline in both O and H as these are volatilized away as the carbon is altered. The three "branches" you see relate to the type of organic material. You can also see in the side-graphs where petroleum forms vs where gas forms etc.

    This is kind of the core of organic geochemistry.

    Your first reference was sufficient and I thank you for it.
    No prob.

  9. #384 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,777
    Thanks
    35,457
    Thanked 50,276 Times in 27,089 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    QM is the basis of Chemistry. It is the heart of chemistry.
    It's shocking that someone with a PhD in "biogeochem" would write this.

    Chemistry, first and foremost, is the study of the reactions and nature of bonds between atoms and molecules based on their valence shell electron state.

    The quantum properties of fundamental particles like leptons, quarks, and the rest of the particle zoo is firmly is within the project of physics.

    Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Pauli were all physicists.

    If you contacted a university and told them you wanted to do a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, 99 times out of 100 they would refer you to the physics department.

  10. #385 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    It's shocking that someone with a PhD in "biogeochem" would write this.

    Chemistry, first and foremost, is the study of the reactions and nature of bonds between atoms and molecules based on their valence shell electron state.
    Those bonds are a function of the electrons around the nucleus. As such it is 100% quantum mechanics. Those bonds define how reactions work.

    The quantum properties of fundamental particles like leptons, quarks, and the rest of the particle zoo is firmly is within the project of physics.
    Quantum is also related to ELECTRONS.


    Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Pauli were all physicists.
    Good you can google.

    If you contacted a university and told them you wanted to do a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, 99 times out of 100 they would refer you to the physics department.
    Bullshit my friend. Bullshit.

    You clearly didn't even take an intro chemistry class if you missed that.

    What do you think those orbitals are? How do you think people understand chemical bonds????

    Wow.

    Just. Wow.

    You are far less experienced in chemistry than I even imagined!

  11. #386 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    It's shocking that someone with a PhD in "biogeochem" would write this.

    Chemistry, first and foremost, is the study of the reactions and nature of bonds between atoms and molecules based on their valence shell electron state.

    The quantum properties of fundamental particles like leptons, quarks, and the rest of the particle zoo is firmly is within the project of physics.

    Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Pauli were all physicists.

    If you contacted a university and told them you wanted to do a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, 99 times out of 100 they would refer you to the physics department.
    You don't have any chemistry books anywhere around you? Open one up. You'll find it filled to the brim with QM.

    (I am honestly confused why you think physics is somehow wholly separable from chemistry as if that makes a difference. But it is clarifying how astoundingly uneducated you are in this area.)

  12. #387 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,753
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 11,417 Times in 7,536 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    You don't have any chemistry books anywhere around you? Open one up. You'll find it filled to the brim with QM.

    (I am honestly confused why you think physics is somehow wholly separable from chemistry as if that makes a difference. But it is clarifying how astoundingly uneducated you are in this area.)
    Cypress actually thinks physics is wholly separable from chemistry??!?! I’d like to see a link to that if he did indeed claim it. Wow.

  13. #388 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,777
    Thanks
    35,457
    Thanked 50,276 Times in 27,089 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    You don't have any chemistry books anywhere around you? Open one up. You'll find it filled to the brim with QM.

    (I am honestly confused why you think physics is somehow wholly separable from chemistry as if that makes a difference. But it is clarifying how astoundingly uneducated you are in this area.)
    You said quantum mechanics was the "heart" of the science of chemistry.

    Nobody who supposedly has a "biogeochem" PhD would write that.

    Chemistry is first and foremost, all about the valence shell electrons, and the reactions and bonds that result from the valence state.

    Here's a project for you: starting Monday morning, call ten different universities, and assuming you get someone who knows what they're doing, tell them you want to get a graduate degree in quantum mechanics.

    All ten universities are going to ultimately refer you to their physics department, not their chemistry or 'biogeochem' department

  14. #389 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    I love how you just ignore stuff that doesn't comport with your views. LOL.

    But then you don't really understand any of this stuff. You're probably as poorly educated as Cypress!
    I understand your religion perfectly well. I think Cypress is getting a clue as well.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  15. #390 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    6,775
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 116 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    You said quantum mechanics was the "heart" of the science of chemistry.
    It is!!!! Seriously. It is how we define the electrons and how the electrons interact. That is the nature of the chemical bond. That is 100% qm.

    What do you think it is?

    Chemistry is first and foremost, all about the valence shell electrons, and the reactions and bonds that result from the valence state.
    OPEN A CHEMISTRY BOOK.

    Seriously dude you are so far off on this you are making a joke of yourself. This is kind of shameful.

    What do you think chemistry is?????????????? How do you think electrons are understood.

Similar Threads

  1. Take It From The Experts
    By Flanders in forum Political - NSFW
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-16-2021, 06:29 PM
  2. The experts are on your side
    By Hermes Thoth in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-28-2020, 04:40 PM
  3. Where would we be without all these experts?
    By ray9 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-15-2020, 04:49 PM
  4. Actual Experts
    By Cancel 2016.11 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 03:48 AM
  5. I believe whatever the UN experts say
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-2011, 08:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •