Page 21 of 43 FirstFirst ... 1117181920212223242531 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 640

Thread: JPP Experts

  1. #301 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    3,639
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked 951 Times in 713 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 109 Times in 102 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Perry PhD and Jank consistently denigrated my intelligence and education.
    I started in when you decided that I was a sock of Jank. I got annoyed with you simply assuming that two people you don't like HAD to be the same person because you didn't like them.

    Then I started to notice that you never seem to say anything technical.. I realized you were posting a LOT like Dutch and you guys liked each others posts over and over and over. And any time you got in a pickle Doc showed up like clockwork.

    You sound haughty and simple. A bully with a limp fist.

    Meanwhile, they were stealing language from Wikipedia entries and passing it off as their own.
    "coined"? Seriously? You think I didn't ever use the word "coined" before Wikipedia?????

    Are you really that stupid?

  2. #302 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    3,639
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked 951 Times in 713 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 109 Times in 102 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Dutch View Post
    I'd rather bring up how many times you and your Jank sock brought up both my and Cypress's education. How many posts did you claim either Cypress or I were uneducated or otherwise less educated than you? Five times? A dozen? More?

    Care to wager on it, Perry?
    I noted that when YOU are challenged (like proving that I brought up my degree more than you guys did) you run away. Why is that?

    ANd why would anyone wager anything with you on an anonymous forum???????????

  3. #303 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    50,698
    Thanks
    30,100
    Thanked 42,521 Times in 22,566 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 2,801 Times in 2,533 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis, alleged PhD and Frantic Googler View Post
    Why don't you post something scientific on here?
    I'm pretty sure I have started more threads on science than any poster in the history of this board.

    Say ANYTHING technically detailed from your "area of expertise".
    You sound like you're 15 years old

    No one here gives a shit about seismic interpretation, borehole geophysics, or watershed assessment, so why would I would I spend time writing threads about about them.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (03-18-2023)

  5. #304 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    50,698
    Thanks
    30,100
    Thanked 42,521 Times in 22,566 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 2,801 Times in 2,533 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    I started in when you decided that I was a sock of Jank. I got annoyed with you simply assuming that two people you don't like HAD to be the same person because you didn't like them.

    Then I started to notice that you never seem to say anything technical.. I realized you were posting a LOT like Dutch and you guys liked each others posts over and over and over. And any time you got in a pickle Doc showed up like clockwork.

    You sound haughty and simple. A bully with a limp fist.



    "coined"? Seriously? You think I didn't ever use the word "coined" before Wikipedia?????

    Are you really that stupid?
    Way to try to sugar coat it.
    The language and syntax you stole was more than just the word coin-->

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    Mulliken coined the term "orbital".

    The orbitals are related to the solutions of the Schroedinger equation as I recall and, unlike the Bohr model, represent more "probability" regions for where the electron "is".
    Remarkable how the syntax and word choice is pretty much like the Wikipedia entry for atomic orbitals, and presented without attribution.

    "The term 'orbital' was coined by Robert Mulliken in 1932"

    "Atomic orbitals...are approximate solutions to the Schrödinger equation"

    --> Wikipedia entry on Atomic Orbitals

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Doc Dutch (03-18-2023)

  7. #305 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    3,224
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,038 Times in 791 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 46 Times in 42 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Dutch View Post
    I'd rather bring up how many times you and your Jank sock brought up both my and Cypress's education. How many posts did you claim either Cypress or I were uneducated or otherwise less educated than you? Five times? A dozen? More?

    Care to wager on it, Perry?
    Why wager on that when you have me stating right here, right now, that all of you are undereducated and scientifically illiterate, even Cypress who is my sock.

    Who are my other eleven socks, Terry?

  8. #306 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    3,639
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked 951 Times in 713 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 109 Times in 102 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Way to try to sugar coat it.
    The language and syntax you stole was more than just the word coin-->


    Remarkable how the syntax and word choice is pretty much like the Wikipedia entry for atomic orbitals, and presented without attribution.
    The highlighted bits???? "Solutions to the Schroedinger Equation" (note I typed out oe rather than copying which would get me the umlaut) is a VERY COMMON PHRASE. Jesus, I used it about a thousand fucking times when I was tutoring and teaching intro.

    What on earth do you think I should have said?????

    And "coined"??? Seriously? That's a VERY common phrase.

    God, you are digging for noise in a signal. I thought you "geophysicists" were trained in signal processing. You don't even fucking know what noise is. Is this why you couldn't complete a graduate degree? You were too busy interpretting noise for signal????

  9. #307 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    3,639
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked 951 Times in 713 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 109 Times in 102 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    I'm pretty sure I have started more threads on science than any poster in the history of this board.
    Claims =\= Evidence.

    No one here gives a shit about seismic interpretation, borehole geophysics
    Look who's googling now! LOL. You don't know what borehole geophysics is you wouldn't know a gamma log from your anus. LOL. Seismic interp? LOL. Like you have a fucking clue. You interpret noise for signal...so you would be a DISASTER at seismic interpretation.

    , or watershed assessment
    Oh, so you're a hydrogeologist too??? Wow! You are a complete package, there! Why not throw in "mineralogist" too?

    , so why would I would I spend time writing threads about about them.
    Because you know you don't know anything about them.

  10. #308 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    109,870
    Thanks
    38,191
    Thanked 55,198 Times in 42,128 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,438 Times in 2,395 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    So you agree you and Cypress are socks of each other?

    Interesting. You do know that QED stands for "thus it is shown".

    Good to know!

    Maybe if you had paid more attention in school you would see the error you just made.
    QED.

  11. #309 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    109,870
    Thanks
    38,191
    Thanked 55,198 Times in 42,128 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,438 Times in 2,395 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
    Why wager on that when you have me stating right here, right now, that all of you are undereducated and scientifically illiterate, even Cypress who is my sock.

    Who are my other eleven socks, Terry?
    Thanks for your input, Sybil.

    Why did you get rid of your signature?

  12. #310 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    109,870
    Thanks
    38,191
    Thanked 55,198 Times in 42,128 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,438 Times in 2,395 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    I noted that when YOU are challenged (like proving that I brought up my degree more than you guys did) you run away. Why is that?

    ANd why would anyone wager anything with you on an anonymous forum???????????
    To see you banned, Perry. Even if only a temp ban.

  13. #311 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    50,698
    Thanks
    30,100
    Thanked 42,521 Times in 22,566 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 2,801 Times in 2,533 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    The highlighted bits???? "Solutions to the Schroedinger Equation" (note I typed out oe rather than copying which would get me the umlaut) is a VERY COMMON PHRASE. Jesus, I used it about a thousand fucking times when I was tutoring and teaching intro.

    What on earth do you think I should have said?????

    And "coined"??? Seriously? That's a VERY common phrase.

    God, you are digging for noise in a signal. I thought you "geophysicists" were trained in signal processing. You don't even fucking know what noise is. Is this why you couldn't complete a graduate degree? You were too busy interpretting noise for signal????
    Perry the frantic Googler leaps into action again.

    Seismic interpretation is distinct from seismic processing.

    Seismic processors deal with signal noise and cleaning up the data. Seismic interpreters map acoustic properties and impedance variation in rocks and sediments to reveal structure and stratigraphy.

    I barely know what ChatGBT and wouldn't know how to use it.

    The fact that you are stealing language and syntax from Wikipedia and stressing out about me using Chat GBT actually sounds like a confession.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Doc Dutch (03-18-2023)

  15. #312 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    50,698
    Thanks
    30,100
    Thanked 42,521 Times in 22,566 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 2,801 Times in 2,533 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Phimosis View Post
    Claims =\= Evidence.



    Look who's googling now! LOL. You don't know what borehole geophysics is you wouldn't know a gamma log from your anus. LOL. Seismic interp? LOL. Like you have a fucking clue. You interpret noise for signal...so you would be a DISASTER at seismic interpretation.



    Oh, so you're a hydrogeologist too??? Wow! You are a complete package, there! Why not throw in "mineralogist" too?



    Because you know you don't know anything about them.
    Explain precisely to me why I should spend my Saturday morning writing about my career to an anonymous resentful poster who lies about having a PhD and steals language from Wikipedia and ChatGBT.

  16. #313 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    60,644
    Thanks
    22,070
    Thanked 10,596 Times in 9,395 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,066 Times in 1,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    I really do not think you realize how tough it is to keep on the lights. You flick a light switch, and the light comes on. You assume it is all easy. There are some very smart people working very hard to make it easy for you.

    If those people were not educated, our society would very quickly collapse.
    And you deny it all.
    "Abortion is not murder under any state law." -- Flash
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "Trump was not a conservative." --Jarod
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

    Everything else debunked here

  17. #314 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    60,644
    Thanks
    22,070
    Thanked 10,596 Times in 9,395 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,066 Times in 1,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    You see I point to the alt right attacking the experts as the cause of the decline. For instance, we keep cutting the spending on electrical infrastructure. Do you think the engineers who work on electrical infrastructure are trying to have their funding cut? No, it is the people who do not even know those engineers exist. They think magic keeps the lights on, so any budget for that is a waste of money.
    You are not experts. You deny engineering, science, mathematics, and logic.
    "Abortion is not murder under any state law." -- Flash
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "Trump was not a conservative." --Jarod
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

    Everything else debunked here

  18. #315 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    60,644
    Thanks
    22,070
    Thanked 10,596 Times in 9,395 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,066 Times in 1,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Dutch View Post
    Agreed, which is why I don't lie.
    Lie.
    "Abortion is not murder under any state law." -- Flash
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "Trump was not a conservative." --Jarod
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

    Everything else debunked here

Similar Threads

  1. Take It From The Experts
    By Flanders in forum Political - NSFW
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-16-2021, 06:29 PM
  2. The experts are on your side
    By JesusAI in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-28-2020, 04:40 PM
  3. Where would we be without all these experts?
    By ray9 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-15-2020, 04:49 PM
  4. Actual Experts
    By Cancel 2016.11 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 03:48 AM
  5. I believe whatever the UN experts say
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-2011, 08:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •