Reply With Quotechristiefan915 (02-05-2023), Guno צְבִי (02-05-2023), Trumpet (02-05-2023)
Racism is a disease
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/Originally Posted by Trumpet
Funded by / Ownership
The New York Post is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, which owns many conservative/sensational media outlets worldwide. The paper is funded through advertising, subscriptions, and newsstand sales.
Analysis / Bias
In review, the New York Post tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wording such as “Cop cold-cocks unarmed man ‘acting irate’ at restaurant,” and “It’s time for Bill Clinton to take a walk in the Chappaqua woods.” The New York Post also republishes news from other sources, such as the least-biased Associated Press. More stories favor the right, but the NY Post does not shy away from reporting negative coverage of the right if it is a big story. They also tend to source their information properly; however, many times, the headline misleadingly exaggerates the actual story they are reporting.
Editorially, The Post has endorsed the Republican Presidential Candidate in every race since 1980. However, in 2016 they did not offer either candidate an endorsement for the Presidential election.
According to an LA Times article, the New York Post is reported to be former U.S. President Donald Trump’s preferred newspaper, which maintains frequent contact with Rupert Murdoch. The Post, According to a survey conducted by Pace University in 2004, was rated the least credible major news outlet in New York. The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch’s ownership for “sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias.”
Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.
Last edited by Joe Capitalist; 02-05-2023 at 11:19 AM.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
christiefan915 (02-05-2023), Guno צְבִי (02-05-2023), Trumpet (02-05-2023)
Racism is a disease
Forbes is an unreliable source?SORRY,....that info came from an unreliable source!
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Politically, Forbes presents a reasonable balance through their contributors; however, when looking at articles pertaining to Trump, there are more in favor of his policies than against.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Guno צְבִי (02-05-2023)
Thread Killer
Irrelevant appeal to authority (and not much of one to begin with). Why not refute the material rather than attack the source? Or, is it that you can't refute the material and that's why you are attacking the source?
Racism is a disease
FoxNews? Aren't they the news source that's being sued for $3 billion dollars for lying and making false statements?
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
fully immersed in faith..
it looks like you are finally starting to make a bit of sense......
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Racism is a disease
The Gateway Pundit? Are you serious? You might as well have posted something from the National Enquirer. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Thread Killer
If you haven't noticed, the Leftists here, like Joke Communist et al., have nothing to argue back with except insults and ad hominem. They're attacking the sources without any attempt to rebut anything said. They have nothing to defend their senile cretin of a leader with.
Nordberg (02-05-2023)
fully immersed in faith..
the most anonymous of anonymous sources "U.S. officials said Saturday" we don't even know if they worked for Defense.....or Education.....or Parks and Recreation.....who?....oh wait, I bet it was the WH.....
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Thread Killer
Are you? You have posted NOTHING but ad hominem so far. Attacking the source instead of refuting the argument presented is a meaningless gesture.The Gateway Pundit? Are you serious? You might as well have posted something from the National Enquirer. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Racism is a disease
Bullshit. Attacking the source is very relevant. You just don't like it because it destroys your argument and makes you all butt-hurt.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Thread Killer
Bullshit. Attacking the source is very relevant. You just don't like it because it destroys your argument and makes you all butt-hurt.
Verified User
3 ballons crossed when Trump was in office, Did you hear about them? Trump set a precedence that Biden decided to step away from. Donnie told us nothing. Biden allowed us to track it like kids tracking Santa. It is here now here and moving there. Rightys decided that we should have shot it down earlier. Trump did not allow that to fester. Rightys are going to bitch. let them. Biden treated us like adults providing ongoing information.
Racism is a disease
Winning the argument?
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Pocket lint
JPP Contributor
Joey wet panties seems to be having a bad day
Honoring my oath
No biggie, ziggy. It didn't bother Trump so why should it bother Biden? Besides, I think the Chinese are playing the US for suckers with this entire little drama. https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/chi...south-america/
And all of this still leaves open the possibility that other adversary aircraft have flown over the U.S. during the Trump years, aside from balloons. We still don’t know why swarms of drones were flying over Colorado and Nebraska in December 2019 and January 2020. If you’ll recall, President Trump was president at that time and we never got an answer to who was behind that.
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
Posting Rules
Bookmarks