Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: 10 rules of philosophy to live by

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 10 rules of philosophy to live by

    1. Be sincere

    “A wrangler is one who aims only at victory, being indifferent whether the arguments which he employs support his own contention or that of his opponent.”
    Akapāda Gautama

    Written some time between the sixth and second centuries BCE, supposedly by Akapāda Gautama, the Indian classic the Nyāya Sūtras is the first great treatise on the principles of reasoning. Gautama distinguishes between three kinds of debate. In jalpa (wrangling) the aim is victory, while vitanda (cavilling) is concerned wholly with criticising the other side. But in good or honest discussion, vada, the aim is truth.

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...phy-to-live-by

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 2. Be charitable

    To avoid what David Hume called the “vulgar error” of “putting nothing but nonsense into the Mouth of the Adversary” we should employ the principle of charity. This requires us to consider the best, strongest version of an opponent’s argument, not only the worst.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 4. Keep it simple, but not simplistic

    “It is futile to do with more things
    that which can be done with fewer.”
    William of Ockham

    The principle of Occam’s razor – one should not multiply entities beyond necessity – was sadly never expressed so clearly by the 14th-century Franciscan friar to whom it is attributed. Sometimes called the parsimony principle, it has come to refer to the idea that all other things being equal, a simpler explanation is preferable to a more complicated one.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 5. Watch your language

    Right now, there is a heated debate about what “woman” and “man” mean in relation to trans people. There is no way of resolving this unless both sides acknowledge that they are engaged in advocacy for their preferred usages, not simply trying to show that one set of meanings is objectively correct.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 6. Be eclectic

    Breadth used to be a typical characteristic of philosophers. Aristotle studied nature in a lagoon on the island of Lesbos, Descartes dissected animals as well as concepts, Hume was better known in his day as a historian than as a philosopher. Narrow specialisation is a recent development.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 7. Think for yourself, not by yourself

    Has the pendulum swung too far towards striking out on your own, though? As the philosopher Alvin Goldman says: “You can get more knowledge by using social sources, that is by drawing on the experiences of others and what they have to contribute. They have maybe better ideas, maybe better education than you do on certain subjects, or they have just read more about it than you have.”

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 8. Seek clarity not certainty

    “Philosophy aims at the logical clarification of thoughts. Philosophy is not a body of doctrine but an activity.”
    Ludwig Wittgenstein

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 9. Pay attention

    t was also by paying close attention that Hume saw how Descartes was wrong to conclude that this thinker whose existence was certain was an indivisible, mental substance. Hume, like the Buddha, invited us to attend more carefully and observe that we are only ever aware of particular thoughts, feelings and sensations, not an “I” that stands behind them.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default 10. Follow the mean

    “Some vices miss what is right because they are deficient, others because they are excessive, in feelings or in actions, while virtue finds and chooses the mean.”
    Aristotle

    Aristotle said: “It is the mark of the trained mind never to expect more precision in the treatment of any subject than the nature of that subject permits.” You can be too precise as well as too vague, you can be too understanding of a view you disagree with as well as too dismissive, you can think too much for yourself or too little.

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,471
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,698 Times in 2,030 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    None of these are rules of philosophy. They might be wise words by which to live but they have nothing to do with how to employ philosophy.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
    None of these are rules of philosophy. They might be wise words by which to live but they have nothing to do with how to employ philosophy.
    Give one of yours, please.

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    11,468
    Thanks
    2,264
    Thanked 2,275 Times in 1,938 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 165 Times in 155 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Give one of yours, please.
    Don't believe Wikipedia.

    What happened to No. 3?

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goat View Post
    Don't believe Wikipedia.

    What happened to No. 3?
    3. Be humble
    “I’m not clever, I don’t find arguments easy to follow.”
    Philippa Foot

    Philippa Foot was one of the best British philosophers of the 20th century. Yet she told me, “I couldn’t give a five-minute lecture on dozens of philosophers. I couldn’t tell you about Spinoza. I’m very uneducated really.”

    Mary Warnock was another philosopher with a keen sense of humility, saying: “I haven’t done very much work and I haven’t done it very well.”

    Both women’s remarks sound ludicrously self-deprecating to anyone who knows their work. In fact, they reveal a self-awareness and honesty that helped them to excel. Foot was probably right to say that she wasn’t as good a scholar as many of her peers and wasn’t especially clever in the sense of having an ability to process complex logical calculations quickly. Rather than trying to compete with those who were, she played to her strengths: great insight, a penetrating mind, and a good nose for what’s right.


    Similarly, Warnock’s excellence was not as an original thinker. She was a great explainer of others’ ideas and, most importantly, a brilliant chair of ethics commissions which helped bring experts together to make public policy. She left a greater legacy than much work by “better” philosophers.

    There are times when confidence and conviction are needed. But when we’re trying to think as clearly as possible, their absence is a virtue, not a vice. We should all become self-aware about where our intellectual strengths and weaknesses lie. Social media shows how the temptation to opine over and above our competence is strong, and must be resisted through intellectual humility.
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...phy-to-live-by

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    11,468
    Thanks
    2,264
    Thanked 2,275 Times in 1,938 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 165 Times in 155 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    3. Be humble
    “I’m not clever, I don’t find arguments easy to follow.”
    Philippa Foot

    Philippa Foot was one of the best British philosophers of the 20th century. Yet she told me, “I couldn’t give a five-minute lecture on dozens of philosophers. I couldn’t tell you about Spinoza. I’m very uneducated really.”

    Mary Warnock was another philosopher with a keen sense of humility, saying: “I haven’t done very much work and I haven’t done it very well.”

    Both women’s remarks sound ludicrously self-deprecating to anyone who knows their work. In fact, they reveal a self-awareness and honesty that helped them to excel. Foot was probably right to say that she wasn’t as good a scholar as many of her peers and wasn’t especially clever in the sense of having an ability to process complex logical calculations quickly. Rather than trying to compete with those who were, she played to her strengths: great insight, a penetrating mind, and a good nose for what’s right.


    Similarly, Warnock’s excellence was not as an original thinker. She was a great explainer of others’ ideas and, most importantly, a brilliant chair of ethics commissions which helped bring experts together to make public policy. She left a greater legacy than much work by “better” philosophers.

    There are times when confidence and conviction are needed. But when we’re trying to think as clearly as possible, their absence is a virtue, not a vice. We should all become self-aware about where our intellectual strengths and weaknesses lie. Social media shows how the temptation to opine over and above our competence is strong, and must be resisted through intellectual humility.
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...phy-to-live-by
    What about Karola Ruth Westheimer?

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goat View Post
    What about Karola Ruth Westheimer?
    Not interested in your stupid trolling.

Similar Threads

  1. The Philosophy Of Nothing
    By AProudLefty in forum Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 11-25-2021, 02:20 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-07-2021, 09:24 AM
  3. What is philosophy? Philosophy is an applied science.
    By BidenPresident in forum Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 06-22-2021, 05:12 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-13-2012, 12:00 PM
  5. The philosophy of WM
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 04:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •