Diesel (01-31-2023), Doc Dutch (01-29-2023), Guno צְבִי (01-29-2023)
Your link was to a partisan, biased source: Fox. Mine was to the actual polling data itself.
It's interesting how many people took advantage of early in-person voting, no matter age or race. That probably had a lot to do with the high turnout. So let's see how many (R)-run states now try to curtail early voting.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
Diesel (01-31-2023), Doc Dutch (01-29-2023), Guno צְבִי (01-29-2023)
Correct. The OP is a soundbite that cherrypicks one result on one crosstab. The next thing Georgia will do is put even more severe restrictions on early in person voting, and eliminate even more polling places in minority communities, because their efforts weren't enough to overcome the will of the people. Because these laws have one intended effect..... suppress minority voting. Period. End of story.
Althea (01-29-2023), Guno צְבִי (01-29-2023), ThatOwlWoman (01-29-2023)
My link was too the OP article which was 100% correct. The second sentence of that article took you to the Poll that the article was based upon. I always vote early. I believe early voting should be no longer than 10 days prior to the election. And I believe all political debates should be completed prior to the beginning of early voting.
IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
Biden/Harris 2024
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
No clairvoyance necessary when that's been a long-established Republican goal.
Note how Republicans in Florida turned their relative minority vote into the majority vote using redistricting.
Actual college graduates will be able to understand the numbers. Dumbasses,not so much.
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
Guno צְבִי (01-29-2023), ThatOwlWoman (01-29-2023)
Althea (01-29-2023)
you mean lib'rul media doesn't want to talk about it?.......Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
1. When I googled it, only RW sources (Fox, Breitbart, National Review, etc.) are showing it.
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
ExpressLane (01-29-2023), Guno צְבִי (01-29-2023)
Diesel (01-31-2023), Guno צְבִי (01-29-2023)
ExpressLane (01-29-2023)
ThatOwlWoman (01-29-2023)
With the data given and what you also provided (assume you consider the data to be accurate) That works out to a margin of error to be ±4.668.
MOE= z * sq.rt. [p̂ (1- p̂)/n ]
Where:
z = critical value for the confidence level (z-score) - There's a table for this. https://evolytics.com/resources/calc...see%20a%20lift. Hint: < that's a link. Click on the light blue colored part and it will show a table for the z-score. I understand you are a little challenged in opening links.
p̂ = sample proportion
n = sample size
Not sure what the relevance this is to the statistical calculation. There is no value, random or otherwise to plug in for that in the formula. Maybe you can explain. If you can't I understand.1. When I googled it, only RW sources (Fox, Breitbart, National Review, etc.) are showing it.
The only objective thing to *believe* is that the poll is outside the 95% MOE.As someone else has pointed out, RWers only like polls that show what they want to believe. lol
If you believe that, who am I to argue against that?
If I were to bet , I'd take the 95% odds of it being correct.
Last edited by anonymoose; 01-29-2023 at 03:47 PM.
ExpressLane (01-29-2023)
Bookmarks