Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 204

Thread: Pfizer Director Physically Assaults James O'Keefe & Project Veritas Staff

  1. #91 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    31,957
    Thanks
    4,430
    Thanked 14,956 Times in 10,497 Posts
    Groans
    550
    Groaned 573 Times in 557 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    he was pissed about the harms done to minor attracted persons.

    Mr. Tiny Penis gaslights by refusing to respond to direct questions then altering the names and quotes of the questioner, something for which he has served time in the penalty box to the extent that there is a rule named after him.

  2. #92 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,602
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WSE cocksucker View Post
    I blew all the members of my militia to prove my loyalty
    TIM, Fredo. TMI!
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  3. #93 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,602
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LEGION's TINY PENIS View Post
    Hi! I'm Legion's tiny penis with a brain to match!
    No shit, Mini-Legion. Why do you think Legion is such a cowardly POS?

    If you see him, please send him this message for me. TIA



    PS now run off like a good little cocksucker and report me.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  4. #94 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    31,957
    Thanks
    4,430
    Thanked 14,956 Times in 10,497 Posts
    Groans
    550
    Groaned 573 Times in 557 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    No shit, Mini-Legion. Why do you think Legion is such a cowardly POS?

    If you see him, please send him this message for me. TIA



    PS now run off like a good little cocksucker and report me.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Lionfish For This Post:

    ExpressLane (01-30-2023)

  6. #95 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    31,957
    Thanks
    4,430
    Thanked 14,956 Times in 10,497 Posts
    Groans
    550
    Groaned 573 Times in 557 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    BREAKING: James O'Keefe gives update on YouTube Removing Critical Mass #DirectedEvolution Video






    https://rumble.com/v27f5xw-breaking-...ss-direct.html

  7. #96 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,828
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,989 Times in 3,362 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 637 Times in 605 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    From the 'Reader's Digest' version site:

    Ambush journalism
    Ambush journalism refers to aggressive tactics practiced by journalists to suddenly confront and question people who otherwise do not wish to speak to a journalist, in places such as homes, vacation spots, hallways, and parking lots. Investigative reporter Steve Weinberg of the Missouri School of Journalism describes "ambush interview" as a loaded shorthand term describing the practice of reporters "catching source unaware, usually in a public place, then acting rudely."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_genres

    The tactic used by a news reporter who intercepts an uncooperative person in an unexpected place, such as a sidewalk or parking lot, in order to put questions to that individual and elicit spur-of-the-moment responses.

    https://www.yourdictionary.com/ambush-journalism

    It is an actual term used to describe a particular style of journalist approach to a story.
    O'Keefe wasn't using ambush journalism. In ambush journalism, they intercept the person, identify as a journalist and then ask questions that are awkward for the person they have ambushed. 60 Minutes did that back in the 70's. They never failed to state who they were and who they worked for.

    This raises the question of whether they were actually conducting journalism which is what Veritas has argued in court. Veritas has been sued and lost cases for pretending to be other people and not identifying as journalists. That is not journalism in any sense of the word.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Poor Richard Saunders For This Post:

    AProudLefty (01-30-2023), Doc Dutch (01-30-2023), LV426 (01-30-2023)

  9. #97 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,602
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    O'Keefe wasn't using ambush journalism. In ambush journalism, they intercept the person, identify as a journalist and then ask questions that are awkward for the person they have ambushed. 60 Minutes did that back in the 70's. They never failed to state who they were and who they worked for.

    This raises the question of whether they were actually conducting journalism which is what Veritas has argued in court. Veritas has been sued and lost cases for pretending to be other people and not identifying as journalists. That is not journalism in any sense of the word.
    Agreed Veritas is not journalism...or truth. Note the irony. LOL

    Also agreed this is better resolved in court. It's my understanding of human nature that tells me it's likely someone will put a cap in Jimmy's ass.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  10. #98 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,796
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 19,969 Times in 14,556 Posts
    Groans
    1,422
    Groaned 949 Times in 933 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    O'Keefe wasn't using ambush journalism. In ambush journalism, they intercept the person, identify as a journalist and then ask questions that are awkward for the person they have ambushed. 60 Minutes did that back in the 70's. They never failed to state who they were and who they worked for.

    This raises the question of whether they were actually conducting journalism which is what Veritas has argued in court. Veritas has been sued and lost cases for pretending to be other people and not identifying as journalists. That is not journalism in any sense of the word.
    Experts call this style of journalism ethical and ambush journalism.

    AMBUSH JOURNALISM Is this type of ambush journalism ethical? This type of ambush jounalis is ethical since it exposes evil and wrong doings in the society.
    Media Ethics - Dateline's "To Catch a Predator"to-catch-a-predator Many of you have probably seen at least one episode of NBC Dateline's "To Catch a Predator." www.youtube.com (Links to an external site.) If you have not, here's my synopsis....NBC Dateline works with an online predator watchdog group called "Perverted Justice" (http://www.perverted-justice.com (Links to an external site.)). Perverted Justice employees pose as young girls and boys (usually 13, 14, or 15 years old) in online chatrooms. The decoys try to get the older men (sometime much older) to meet them in person. The men drive to the decoy's house (sometimes from hundreds of miles away). All of this is caught on tape. Each man is invited in to the home by the decoy and they meet for a brief moment. Then the decoy leaves the room and NBC reporter Chris Hansen enters. Hansen asks the man about why he is at the teenager's home and what he expected from the rendezvous. The men often have seen the show before but still show up. Shortly after the exchange with Hansen, the man usually flees the house and is then arrested outside by the police and charged as a sex offender in that state. [B]1) Is this type of "ambush journalism" ethical? (Definition of ambush journalism: Ambush journalism refers to aggressive t actics practiced by journalists to suddenly confront with questions people who otherwise do not wish to speak to a journalist.)
    https://studybay.com/latest-orders/44019/
    Last edited by ExpressLane; 01-30-2023 at 11:48 AM.
    IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
    Biden/Harris 2024
    IT'S A NO BRAINER!


  11. #99 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    I wish someone would beat the living shit out of that little fucking putz.
    that is because you are a piece of shit authoritarian, but you also pee sitting down - so your tough guy routine is limited to the internet

  12. #100 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    85,117
    Thanks
    2,505
    Thanked 16,531 Times in 10,535 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 578 Times in 535 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    They didn't get his permission to be recorded.
    There's no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public setting.
    Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
    - -- Aristotle

    Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
    - -- The Buddha

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    - -- Aristotle

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Damocles For This Post:

    Lionfish (01-30-2023)

  14. #101 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,602
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Damocles View Post
    There's no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public setting.
    That depends. In Texas, it's this: https://guides.sll.texas.gov/recordi...udio-recording
    "Texas is considered a "one-party consent" state. This means that unless at least one of the parties to a conversation consents, both Texas and federal wiretapping laws make it a crime to record an audio conversation, either in person or over the phone, if the parties have a "reasonable expectation of privacy".

    Courts have generally held that there may not be a reasonable expectation of privacy out in public, but the legality of a specific recording will depend on the circumstances. An attorney can advise you on the recording laws and how they may affect a recording you plan to make.

    Below you will find links to Texas and federal laws related to audio recordings...
    "

    https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.co...-myself-anothe
    "The U.S. and the states have their own laws governing the legality of surreptitious recording of oral, telephonic, and other communications. A person's secret taping of a conversation is governed by the laws of the state in which she is making the recording unless the federal law is more protective of privacy....

    ...The Wiretap Act (as well as each state law governing secret recording of conversations) protects only those communications that the individuals being secretly recorded reasonably expect to be private. Whether one has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a given situation depends upon the context: Was the conversation in a public or private location? Did the individual being recorded treat the subject matter as private? A person who is bragging at a party about cheating a friend in a business deal cannot later object to the introduction of a recording of this admission as evidence in a lawsuit filed by his ex-friend."
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  15. #102 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,828
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,989 Times in 3,362 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 637 Times in 605 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    Experts call this style of journalism ethical and ambush journalism.



    https://studybay.com/latest-orders/44019/
    You will notice that the reporter identifies themselves as a reporter. No one working for the news organization pretended to be someone else or lied to anyone about who they were.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  16. #103 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    63,304
    Thanks
    6,234
    Thanked 13,406 Times in 10,036 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,947 Times in 2,728 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Damocles View Post
    There's no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public setting.
    Does that include public internet message boards?

    Why have a doxxing rule if this is what you really believe? To protect Nazis, apparently.
    When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist


  17. #104 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    that's not what happened here, but nice try
    The staff is the third party.

  18. #105 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    wrong.
    Right.

Similar Threads

  1. Project Veritas goes after Fox
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-16-2021, 03:05 PM
  2. Project Veritas does it again
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-14-2019, 12:50 PM
  3. James O'Keefe is a criminal
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-28-2017, 06:52 PM
  4. Trumpkin James O'Keefe and Project Veritas BUSTED!
    By ZappasGuitar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-11-2017, 11:20 PM
  5. Project Veritas Action
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-24-2016, 06:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •