I dont want to but im having trouble with all the empirical evidence available in the world. I mean just take Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Two nations side by side with generally the same resources (with Haiti even invading the DR). One had been run exclusively by blacks since its founding and is now one of the biggest shit holes in the world whereas the DR was run by whites longer.
Its just so hard to look at the world now and try to deny the evidence
Like someone said slaves dont get a choice. If you were in that state already I would say America is preferable to the dark continent.
I think our education has been too disneyfied. We all think Jigaboos just played and danced in the jungle with the animals before the white man came when in reality they were more violent towards each other than the whites ever were to them. Hell you can see it now when its a huge national story when a white is violent to a black but sort of just expected behavior when two blacks have a nigger moment and end up killing each other.
Again, they had no choice. And there was no guarantee that the slaves would be treated well or better.
It was a racist propaganda designed to give them a reason to treat them less than a person.I think our education has been too disneyfied. We all think Jigaboos just played and danced in the jungle with the animals before the white man came when in reality they were more violent towards each other than the whites ever were to them. Hell you can see it now when its a huge national story when a white is violent to a black but sort of just expected behavior when two blacks have a nigger moment and end up killing each other.
It's a yes or no question. Am I reading your paragraph correctly to mean you believe Whites are genetically superior to Blacks?
Do you understand that modern geneticists have determined that there's no such thing as "race"? That regional differences are minor? That there's more variation within regional groups than outside of them?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/
As a taxonomic term, race defines an informal subdivision of subspecies which are physically and genetically different. However, the species Homo sapiens cannot be further subdivided into subspecies which are physically and genetically different. Thus, for H.sapiens, the species and subspecies are the same—H.sapiens sapiens (Box 1). In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
SIgh I just keep repeating myself over and over because none of you can even challenge the basic premises of the arguments. Sad. Of course you cant guarantee anything. But American slave owners were incentivized to treat their slaves better because of the value add of buying the slave from the initial slave catcher and transporting him to the US. Thats a lot of people who you have to pay which inflates the price of the final product. Whereas the slave owner in Africa could be more careless as they can just raid the next tribe over if they needed to restock their inventory. Half the value add chain didnt exist for them lowering the price of the final product.
And so again just purely based on treatment it was far better to be a slave to a whitey in teh US than to a tribal black kang in Africa.
Edit: Let me just go further. The blacks in Africa who were taken as slaves should be thanking the caucasian God that they ended up as slaves in America as the other range of outcomes was far worse.
AProudLefty (12-06-2022), Guno צְבִי (12-06-2022)
AProudLefty (12-06-2022), Guno צְבִי (12-06-2022)
My research indicates he's another banned douchebag: tinfoil. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/member.php?23-tinfoil
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
AProudLefty (12-06-2022), Guno צְבִי (12-06-2022)
Bookmarks