Warnock won't answer

[BartenderElite]

No one in their right mind gave them credit for it. It was their down on their knees immediately cowardice that let it happen. Just to clear things up.

Interesting take. I thought it was the barrage of Republican lies that we've all gotten so used to at this point that let it happen.

Besides the point, though. It wasn't a Christian war.

[Theywillneverlearn!]

Interesting take. I thought it was the barrage of Republican lies that we've all gotten so used to at this point that let it happen.

Besides the point, though. It wasn't a Christian war.

democrats were all in for it. No denying that. They had a chance to stop it cold. They knew they were going make good blood money out of it. And still do.

[BartenderElite]

democrats were all in for it. No denying that. They had a chance to stop it cold. They knew they were going make good blood money out of it. And still do.

I don't give Dems a pass on that. Wouldn't vote for any of 'em that supported it or voted for it.

[T. A. Gardner]

Yet again you hate abortion of any kind, except of course when your candidate forces his women into it. Then you look the other way.

I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.

[BartenderElite]

I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.

I don't agree w/ that logic. We're talking about a woman's right to decide what to do w/ her own body. We really don't have a more sacred right than that.

Men don't have to carry a fetus to term. That's exclusively w/ the woman.

[Doc Dutch]

I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.

I disagree on giving rapists and pedophile "fathers" the right to have a 50% say in an abortion. If the couple is married, then, yes, I think the husband should have a say in it.

[Phantasmal]

Isn't Warnock some sort of ordained minister? What's his church say about abortion?

As a Baptist minister, you'd think his position would be reflected by his denomination's religious beliefs that abortion is wrong in all cases--the position generally held by the Baptist Church in the US in general. Of course, that position is completely incompatible with being a Democrat so you get crickets when it comes up from a money grubbing political hack like Warnock.

Christianity teaches you to be responsible for your own sin, Christianity teaches to judge not, and the concept of free will, that is why a minister can hold the idea that religious concepts should not infringe upon other’s rights. Sen. Warnock can be like other Christian Congress people and separate their Church from the State.

[Concart]

Instead choose a guy who financed a couple of them.

And he's a werewolf to boot.

No serious person would EVER vote for Herschel Walker. He is a liar, mentally disturbed, and a woman beater. Great candidates you support there, fake doc

[Doc Dutch]

Christianity teaches you to be responsible for your own sin, Christianity teaches to judge not, and the concept of free will, that is why a minister can hold the idea that religious concepts should not infringe upon other’s rights. Sen. Warnock can be like other Christian Congress people and separate their Church from the State.

Exactly. Let God judge, not people who think they know better.

Notice that most of the anti-abortionists on JPP are also White Nationalists who favor keeping white males on top and everyone else one or more rungs down the ladder.

[Phantasmal]

One can CLAIM to be a Christian and be pro-choice but one can't BE a Christian and be pro-choice.

Thank you, God

[Doc Dutch]

One can CLAIM to be a Christian and be pro-choice but one can't BE a Christian and be pro-choice.

White Nationalist ideology posted by someone who recommended HCQ over COVID vaccine.

[LurchAddams]

Isn't Warnock some sort of ordained minister? What's his church say about abortion?

As a Baptist minister, you'd think his position would be reflected by his denomination's religious beliefs that abortion is wrong in all cases--the position generally held by the Baptist Church in the US in general. Of course, that position is completely incompatible with being a Democrat so you get crickets when it comes up from a money grubbing political hack like Warnock.

Why won't McCarthy denounce twump having Nazis at his house and calling for the Constitution to be canceled?

Also, you really don't see the irony about your accusing Warnock of moral failings? Who's he running against?

Seriously, dude.

[BartenderElite]

Thank you, God

I only see politicized Christians pull the "more Christian than thou" card usually.

Religion and spirituality are private & personal. I consider myself to be a Christian, and I'm the only one who defines what that means for me.

[AProudLefty]

I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.

There is no such thing as "abortion on demand". And most abortions are done within 8-10 weeks. Once they go beyond that, you can be sure they want the babies.

And men do not get pregnant.

[LurchAddams]

It's just a "gotcha" question. Pollsters have advised Dems to stay away from it - because their answers will be taken out of context.

The entire GOP is playing politics by not denouncing twump for his having an orgy with Nazis, taking secret docs and calling for the repeal of the Constitution. And now their all endorsing Walker. It's a good thing Republicans don't have shame or they'd die from it!