Israel orders forcible deportation of Palestinian human rights defender Salah Hammour

[McRocket]

'Palestinian human rights lawyer Salah Hammouri, who is currently imprisoned by Israel, has been ordered by the Israeli state to be deported on December 4th, following the revocation of his Jerusalem residency status.

Last year the Israeli government revoked the Jerusalem residency of Hammouri, a dual Palestinian-French citizen who was born in Jerusalem, on the basis of “breach of allegiance” to the state. The decision comes after an Israeli Supreme Court ruling back in July that allowed for stripping citizenship or Jerusalem residency status from those found in “breach of loyalty” to the state.

Over the past two decades, Hammouri has spent more than eight years in Israeli prisons, with several stints in administrative detention – a policy used by Israel against Palestinians allowing for indefinite detention without charge or trial.'

...

'Hammouri was born and raised in Jerusalem, and has called the city his home his entire life. He is one of more than 370,000 Palestinians residents of Jerusalem, which was illegally annexed by Israel in 1967.'

https://mondoweiss.net/2022/12/israe...alah-hammouri/


And the tradition of Israeli leaders treating the Palestinian's like human scum...continues.

[cancel2 2022]

.
It's bullshit he's not a lawyer he's a terrorist. The Guardian is the house propaganda organ for the PFLP, truly loathsome newspaper.

Guardian corrects article on convicted terrorist Salah Hamouri.

A Guardian piece by Bethan McKernan refers to Salah Hamouri as a “human rights lawyer” (“Human rights lawyer in Israeli prison goes on hunger strike“, Sept. 28), despite acknowledging – in the 8th paragraph – his 2005 conviction for plotting to assassinate Israel’s former Chief Rabbi.

Hamouri, a French-Palestinian whose conviction also included terrorism funding, and recruitment for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist group, was released in December 2011 as part of a swap for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

The Guardian piece begins with the following grossly misleading omission about his current detention:

A prominent Palestinian-French human rights lawyer has gone on hunger strike in protest against his imprisonment without charge by Israeli authorities for the last six months.

As we noted in a complaint to Guardian editors this morning, at the time of his detention, it was reported that Hamouri was accused of being a member of PFLP, designated as a terrorist organisation by the US, EU, Canada, and Israel.

Our complaint was upheld, and the following paragraph added:

In a statement, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said that Hamouri was detained on suspicion of activity in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is designated as a terrorist organisation by Israel’s western allies.

Though we commend editors for the correction, the fact that McKernan referred to a convicted Palestinian terrorist as a “human rights” lawyer is another example of how the Guardian’s coverage of the region can be best described as pro-Palestinian advocacy, rather than real journalism.

https://camera-uk.org/2022/09/29/gua...salah-hamouri/

[McRocket]

'Salah Hamouri (Arabic: صلاح حموري) (born 25 April 1985[1] to a French mother and a Palestinian father,) is a Palestinian lawyer and field researcher for the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association.[2] His wife – who is French – has been barred since January 2016 from entering Israel or the Occupied West Bank to visit him.[2][3]

Hamouri was arrested in 2005 and accused of plotting to murder Ovadia Yosef, the former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel. After over 3 years' detention without trial,[4] on the advice of his lawyer, while protesting his innocence he admitted culpability in a plea bargain in order to avoid a 14-year term of imprisonment, and was condemned by a military tribunal to serve a 7 year sentence.[3] A number of committees have formed to protest against his treatment and affirm his innocence.[3][5] Hamouri was released in exchange for the return of the Israeli POW Gilad Shalit in December 2011.[6]

He has been repeatedly placed under a regime of administrative detention – which Amnesty International considers 'a major human rights violation'[7] – a procedure depriving people of their personal liberty[8] by arresting and keeping them in custody, without laying charges or putting them on trial. The procedure can be repeated indefinitely.[9][8] It has been claimed that he has been held in detention for a crime of opinion.[10]'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salah_Hamouri


Israel - the Apartheid of the 21'st century.

[tsuke]

Can something be illegally annexed? Putin took Crimea a couple of years ago and everyone was fine with it. I bet this entire thing now ends up with some land changing hands as well. If it was done in this century why isnt a country winning a war and annexxing territory last century valid?

[cancel2 2022]

'Salah Hamouri (Arabic: صلاح حموري) (born 25 April 1985[1] to a French mother and a Palestinian father,) is a Palestinian lawyer and field researcher for the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association.[2] His wife – who is French – has been barred since January 2016 from entering Israel or the Occupied West Bank to visit him.[2][3]

Hamouri was arrested in 2005 and accused of plotting to murder Ovadia Yosef, the former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel. After over 3 years' detention without trial,[4] on the advice of his lawyer, while protesting his innocence he admitted culpability in a plea bargain in order to avoid a 14-year term of imprisonment, and was condemned by a military tribunal to serve a 7 year sentence.[3] A number of committees have formed to protest against his treatment and affirm his innocence.[3][5] Hamouri was released in exchange for the return of the Israeli POW Gilad Shalit in December 2011.[6]

He has been repeatedly placed under a regime of administrative detention – which Amnesty International considers 'a major human rights violation'[7] – a procedure depriving people of their personal liberty[8] by arresting and keeping them in custody, without laying charges or putting them on trial. The procedure can be repeated indefinitely.[9][8] It has been claimed that he has been held in detention for a crime of opinion.[10]'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salah_Hamouri


Israel - the Apartheid of the 21'st century.

.

[LurchAddams]

'Palestinian human rights lawyer Salah Hammouri, who is currently imprisoned by Israel, has been ordered by the Israeli state to be deported on December 4th, following the revocation of his Jerusalem residency status.

Last year the Israeli government revoked the Jerusalem residency of Hammouri, a dual Palestinian-French citizen who was born in Jerusalem, on the basis of “breach of allegiance” to the state. The decision comes after an Israeli Supreme Court ruling back in July that allowed for stripping citizenship or Jerusalem residency status from those found in “breach of loyalty” to the state.

Over the past two decades, Hammouri has spent more than eight years in Israeli prisons, with several stints in administrative detention – a policy used by Israel against Palestinians allowing for indefinite detention without charge or trial.'

...

'Hammouri was born and raised in Jerusalem, and has called the city his home his entire life. He is one of more than 370,000 Palestinians residents of Jerusalem, which was illegally annexed by Israel in 1967.'

https://mondoweiss.net/2022/12/israe...alah-hammouri/


And the tradition of Israeli leaders treating the Palestinian's like human scum...continues.

He was arrested for allegedly conspiring to kill someone.

[LurchAddams]

Can something be illegally annexed? Putin took Crimea a couple of years ago and everyone was fine with it. I bet this entire thing now ends up with some land changing hands as well. If it was done in this century why isnt a country winning a war and annexxing territory last century valid?

Everyone was not "fine with it". Sanctions were put on Russia, and they were expelled from the G8, now the G7.

You really don't know shit.

[tsuke]

Everyone was not "fine with it". Sanctions were put on Russia, and they were expelled from the G8, now the G7.

You really don't know shit.

Did they take it back and give it to Ukraine? If I remmember correctly they even held the olympics in Russia later that year

[LurchAddams]

Did they take it back and give it to Ukraine? If I remmember correctly they even held the olympics in Russia later that year

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? You said "everyone was fine with it". Just admit your stupidity and move on, toilet boy.

[tsuke]

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? You said "everyone was fine with it". Just admit your stupidity and move on, toilet boy.

They were ok with it : ) They even went to Russia for the olympics

[moon]

And the tradition of Israeli leaders treating the Palestinian's like human scum...continues.

They usually murder their opposition, political leaders, kids in the streets, journalists, American or otherwise. The latest journalist that they murdered was high-profile and the shit that hit the fan becomes denser and more widespread by the week. That's probably why the scum didn't murder Salah Hammouri.

Congratulations on openly supporting law and justice when Israelis are the criminals. Most members here are too timid- spineless or corrupt like the obnoxious, ethnic-cleansing supportive Brit maggot.

Here's a Guardian video of the Neo-Zionist scum attacking a Palestinian funeral with clubs and tasers. It's the sort of report that prosemitic assholes want censored;




There will be a reckoning.

[moon]

Can something be illegally annexed?

No. Occupation and annexation are prohibited under international law , the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions.

Putin took Crimea a couple of years ago and everyone was fine with it. I bet this entire thing now ends up with some land changing hands as well. If it was done in this century why isnt a country winning a war and annexxing territory last century valid?

The illegality of occupation and annexation by force is a product of modern international law, from the early 1920s through to the creation of the United nations in 1945. Earlier conquests were not subject to such humanitarian laws. We are improving as a species.

Well, some of us. The Israeli assholes ignore the law- and Washington supports them. For this reason the US- and its allies- have no moral say in Russia's apparent transgressions.
These are debatable under law anyway as their occupations came as a result of requests from the inhabitants. That's not ' taking by force '.

[tsuke]

No. Occupation and annexation are prohibited under international law , the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions.



The illegality of occupation and annexation by force is a product of modern international law, from the early 1920s through to the creation of the United nations in 1945. Earlier conquests were not subject to such humanitarian laws. We are improving as a species.

Well, some of us. The Israeli assholes ignore the law- and Washington supports them. For this reason the US- and its allies- have no moral say in Russia's apparent transgressions.
These are debatable under law anyway as their occupations came as a result of requests from the inhabitants. That's not ' taking by force '.

Thats a good point. The land was previously Jordans if I understand correctly. If they give their ok can Israel have it?

[McRocket]

They usually murder their opposition, political leaders, kids in the streets, journalists, American or otherwise. The latest journalist that they murdered was high-profile and the shit that hit the fan becomes denser and more widespread by the week. That's probably why the scum didn't murder Salah Hammouri.

Congratulations on openly supporting law and justice when Israelis are the criminals. Most members here are too timid- spineless or corrupt like the obnoxious, ethnic-cleansing supportive Brit maggot.

Here's a Guardian video of the Neo-Zionist scum attacking a Palestinian funeral with clubs and tasers. It's the sort of report that prosemitic assholes want censored;




There will be a reckoning.

For the sake of the Palestinian's?
I wish it would come soon.

[moon]

Thats a good point. The land was previously Jordans if I understand correctly. If they give their ok can Israel have it?

It was British at the point of legal division- and the British gave half of it to a bunch of European Ashkenazis via UN resolution 181 in 1947. Of course, the same applied to the other half for Arabs- who already owned it. Arrogant fuckers, those colonialist Brits.