For a scholarly discussion on the this topic from people who actually understand it....
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...f-jobs-created
Maybe now I see your point.
'We are done here' means EXACTLY what it says.
We ARE done here...in this thread.
Not on the entire, fucking board.
I would have thought you had the common sense to figure that out.
I see I was wrong.
Now piss off and go and get a job.
Or do SOMETHING that is of ANY use.
Even old losers like you can get a simple, minimum wage job.
So stop boozing, get off your fat ass and go and make some money.
Or - at the very least - stop insulting your wife whom is your SOLE source of income (outside of welfare).
Loser.
Last edited by McRocket; 12-04-2022 at 05:46 PM.
For a scholarly discussion on the this topic from people who actually understand it....
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...f-jobs-created
F
You go to school and promptly fail all your courses. I am curious how you think the Household survey calculates the population over 16. The use the same birth-death model since they do not call every household in the US. I showed that the CHS shows that November had better employment than August. The .1% change isn't indicative of any trend but is just noise.
3 data points that are well within the margin of error shouldn't be used to show a trend. Anyone that does so is ignorant of statistics. Calculate the trend using the last 10-12 months. There is no actual trend. There is just you using statistical noise claiming it shows a trend.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
LV426 (12-05-2022)
WRONG!!!
You just made that ENTIRE, shit up.
The BLS uses the CES Net Birth-Death model ONLY for the Establishment Survey.
'Currently, the CES sample includes about 131,000 businesses and government agencies drawn from a sampling frame of Unemployment Insurance tax accounts which cover approximately 670,000 individual worksites.'
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesbd.htm
They do NOT use this model - or any similar model - on the Household Survey.
Okay, Mr. Expert?
Post a link on the BLS website that factually proves that they use 'the same' 'CES Net Birth-Death Model' for the Household Survey?
If you can't (and you will not be able to - btw).
Then you will prove that your ENTIRE statement above is made up and you know dick on this subject.
Last edited by McRocket; 12-05-2022 at 02:37 PM.
Last edited by McRocket; 12-05-2022 at 01:23 PM.
Apparently this asshole has never heard about layoffs and retirements.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
How do you think the CHS gets its population numbers if they don't use the birth/death model? Do you think they just pull random numbers out of a hat?
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces_c...s.htm#conceptsPopulation controls in the household survey
Population controls are independent estimates of population used to weight the household survey sample results to reflect the civilian noninstitutional population age 16 and older. The U.S. Census Bureau develops the population controls. They are based on decennial census population counts, supplemented with birth and death data and estimates of net international migration.
By the way... the household survey also says this on the same page.
The survey clearly says a change of under 500,000 is statistically insignificant and shouldn't be taken as anything other than noise.Approximate size of over-the-month change in employment required for statistical significance at the 90-percent confidence level
± 500,000
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Who or what the heck is the 'CHS'?
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces_c...s.htm#concepts
By the way... the household survey also says this on the same page.
The survey clearly says a change of under 500,000 is statistically insignificant and shouldn't be taken as anything other than noise.
My question to you was:
'Post a link on the BLS website that factually proves that they use 'the same' 'CES Net Birth-Death Model' for the Household Survey?
If you can't (and you will not be able to - btw).
Then you will prove that your ENTIRE statement above is bullshit and you know dick on this subject.'
You failed to post said link (because no such link exists).
Which proves you made up your entire, earlier point that I highlighted.
On top of which - as I assumed - you do not have the guts to admit that no such link exists.
Instead?
You try to strawman your way out of your mistake.
We are done on this point.
Last edited by McRocket; 12-05-2022 at 02:54 PM.
You don't seriously expect me to read your reply posts to me...do you?
You HATE ALL CHILDREN!!!
You are a seriously-disturbed woman.
Why would I converse with the likes of you?
Answer - I would not (unless, maybe, I was INCREDIBLY bored...which I am not).
GET HELP!
ONLY A SICK PERSON 'HATES ALL CHILDREN'!
I MEAN IT!!!
Last edited by McRocket; 12-05-2022 at 03:04 PM.
2 data points don't make a trend. You normally should have 6-7 depending on the accuracy of the data. Two data points within the margin of error certainly don't show a trend.
You are attempting to claim that something that is statistically insignificant is a trend when the reality is that the numbers are statistically the same. If you see a change of 1,000,000 then it would be statistically significant but you still can't call it a trend since it could be the result of error or an event that will quickly be over such as a major weather event causing a week of people not working.Approximate size of over-the-month change in employment required for statistical significance at the 90-percent confidence level
± 500,000
The one thing to look for is in the next 2-3 months we should see all the announced layoffs start to show up in the data. Large companies are required to give 2-3 month notices by law before layoffs. Several companies have done that, Amazon, Google, and Twitter. We should start to see those numbers in January and February as the layoffs occur. Then the question will be whether all those people quickly find a job or show up in the numbers for several months. That will show if there is a trend.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
CPS is the Household Survey. (I wrote it as CHS, thinking household.)
It looks like there are 2 birth/death statistics used. Birth/death of businesses and birth/death of population. I assumed you were talking about the latter. My mistake.
My question to you was:
'Post a link on the BLS website that factually proves that they use 'the same' 'CES Net Birth-Death Model' for the Household Survey?
If you can't (and you will not be able to - btw).
Then you will prove that your ENTIRE statement above is bullshit and you know dick on this subject.'
You failed to post said link (because no such link exists).
Which proves you made up your entire, earlier point that I highlighted.
On top of which - as I assumed - you do not have the guts to admit that no such link exists.
Instead?
You try to strawman your way out of your mistake.
We are done on this point.
Now your turn to admit your mistake in calling 2 datapoints within the margin of error a trend.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
WRONG!!!
'trend
n.
1. A general tendency or course of events: a warming trend. See Synonyms at tendency.
2. Current style; vogue: the latest trend in fashion.
3. The general direction of something: the river's southern trend.'
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/trend
There is NO such thing as a minimum, time frame required for something to become a 'trend'.
Again...you are obviously just guessing/making shit up as you go.
And tossing out random stats and saying: 'HERE!'
Even when they prove little/nothing.
You are OBVIOUSLY yet ANOTHER Bidenbot who goes all to pieces, if anyone posts data that makes the Senile-One look bad.
Whereas I DESPISE both parties...and have zero, political biases.
Go and waste someone else's time.
We are done here.
Good day.
Last edited by McRocket; 12-05-2022 at 03:23 PM.
Bookmarks