anatta (11-14-2022)
I found this article, just published on Scheerpost and written by Leonard Goodman, to be quite good, thought others might find it interesting as well...
**
November 9, 2022
The US continues to fan the flames of nuclear conflict with massive investments in the war department. How long can this last?
By Leonard C. Goodman / Original to ScheerPost
A recent poll conducted by the Quincy Institute found that 57% of likely voters strongly or somewhat support the US pursuing diplomatic negotiations as soon as possible to end the war in Ukraine, even if it requires Ukraine making compromises with Russia.
Despite relentless pro-war propaganda, a majority of Americans are not on board with their government’s strategy of pouring endless weapons into Ukraine’s war with its nuclear-armed neighbor and hoping for the best. They are concerned about the costs of this war – more than 60 billion taxpayer dollars have already been spent, with much of that money filling the coffers of U.S. arms manufacturers.
Americans are also concerned about the growing risk of nuclear Armageddon. In 2019, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists kept the Doomsday Clock set to two minutes before midnight following the United States’s unilateral withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. Then on January 20, 2022, as tensions escalated between Russia and Ukraine, and also between the U.S. and China, the clock was reset to 100 seconds from midnight — on “doom’s doorstep.”
**
Full article:
Will Our War-for-Profit System Lead to Nuclear Annihilation? | Scheerpost
anatta (11-14-2022)
Perhaps the city of Kherson, which it recently evacuated. You may say that it's already given that up, but I'd say that it hasn't, in the sense that Russia's still claiming that Kherson is part of Russia.
Now, I can certainly concede that it may be willing to give up more, I'm just saying that I currently don't see that happening.
It's one of the contributing factors, yes.Will Our War-for-Profit System Lead to Nuclear Annihilation?
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
Phoenyx (11-14-2022)
I think it's worth reminding people of this, especially considering the fervour with which the west encourages the continuation of the war in Ukraine.
I'd certainly agree that Russia is losing weapons and personnel, but so is Ukraine. As to losing the war, I think you're confusing tactical retreats with losing the war. I don't see Russia leaving most if not all of the territory that it has annexed, especially considering the fact that it only annexed these territories after holding referendums in them and the Ukrainians there all apparently strongly voted in favour of joining Russia. I think that around the only thing that could make them leave would be a nuclear exchange between them and NATO on the land, making it uninhabitable for everyone.
I've seen no hard evidence suggesting that removing Zelensky was ever a Russian objective. That doesn't mean it's not, I'm just saying I've seen no hard evidence that this is the case.
For now. Let's not forgot that most if not all of the territory they've lost was previously gained. I see no reason why it can't be regained.
I strongly suspect that you are fairly unaware of the 8 year Ukrainian civil war that preceded Russia's military operation in Ukraine. I made a thread that gets into this and how it led to the current war that you might want to take a look at. It's here if you're interested:
Former Swiss Intelligence Officer blows the whistle on West's Ukraine War Narrative | justplainpolitics.com
Phoenyx (11-14-2022)
I haven't seen evidence for either of your assertions. Despite the U.S.'s frequent contempt for the U.N., it remains a U.S. based organization and its largest funder by far as well, contributing around 22% of the U.N.'s budget for the period between 2019 and 2021, according to Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding
China comes in a distant second in funding, at around 12%.
how in the hell is this war our concern ? why no conditions on peace talks?Despite relentless pro-war propaganda, a majority of Americans are not on board with their government’s strategy of pouring endless weapons into Ukraine’s war with its nuclear-armed neighbor and hoping for the best. They are concerned about the costs of this war – more than 60 billion taxpayer dollars have already been spent, with much of that money filling the coffers of U.S. arms manufacturers.
Why should Ukraine engage with Russia at all since Russia is now in full retreat?
Russia has no leverage anymore.
They have lost tens of thousands of their own troops.
They are broke.
The people inside Russia are resisting.
But you continue to spread Russia's lies and advocate for Russia on JPP, like when you lied about getting an unsolicited mail in ballot because you were trying to interfere in the 2020 election.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
WASHINGTON, Oct 5 (Reuters) - Nearly three-quarters of Americans say that the United States should continue to support Ukraine, despite Russian threats that it could use nuclear weapons to protect its territory, according to a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll released on Wednesday.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/three-four-americans-say-us-should-support-ukraine-despite-russian-threats-2022-10-05/
Bookmarks