Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, The Anonymous, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Niche Political Commentor, Superfreak, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, saltydancin, serenity, Yakuda and ParachuteAdams


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: 0.0073

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    137,932
    Thanks
    47,312
    Thanked 69,449 Times in 52,464 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 2,513 Times in 2,470 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Thanks for chiming in chaps. I will get back to you Dutch, I have to get sidetracked on something else
    No worries, Cypress. Good thread and excellent topic.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Doc Dutch For This Post:

    Cypress (09-30-2022)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,188
    Thanks
    35,735
    Thanked 50,683 Times in 27,327 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Agreed on probability. Agreed, we're the only known Universe and all else, be it gods, supernatural, multiple dimensions, planes of existence and multiverses are just speculations.

    Not sure what you mean "repeated coincidences". There's no life found anywhere else in our own Solar System or the Universe. It's speculation (probability theory again) that there is other life, but ZERO evidence of it. Just speculation.

    Repeated coincidences = the numerous physical and cosmological constants that converged on very specific values allowing matter, planets, and organic life to exist.

    Your point of view certainly is valid. Some physicists think the convergence of the universal constants is nothing to worry about. Others think these coincidences are pointing to some deep symmetry we don't understand yet.

    Those in the “don't worry about it” camp take a strict statistical view that says we have an after-the-fact probability of unity, so we shouldn’t be surprised.

    Furthermore, we can infer nothing about the “before-the-fact” probability. There was a Big Bang, and life-giving parameters were chosen—end of story.

    The "let's worry about it" camp is still bothered by the low before-the-fact probability of getting these parameters, and they resolve the dilemma by appealing to a multiverse. If there are many Universes, all with different properties, most will be sterile, but there’ll be some fertile ones, and we’re obviously in one of them. This viewpoint has gained support from two recent developments: Modern Inflation theories can generate a multiverse, and both Inflation and String Theory can generate Universes with different laws of physics.

    - Mark Whittle, astronomer

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •