Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 141

Thread: California bans building parking lots near transit stops

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,630
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,269 Times in 13,402 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 841 Times in 800 Posts

    Default California bans building parking lots near transit stops

    If your business is within a half mile of a transit (eg., bus) stop, you will no longer be able to build parking spaces or a parking lot to accommodate your customers. If you are building apartments, you can't provide parking spaces for your tenants. If you are a car dealer... Well, you get the idea here. The state of California expects you to take the bus or other public transit everywhere like a good little peasant.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/real...29775aa0a4710b

    So, I guess this means people won't need those mandated electric cars after all...

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Bigdog (09-24-2022), Callinectes (09-24-2022), Celticguy (09-24-2022)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    from the article:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that bars local governments from mandating parking spaces as part of most development near transit stops.
    so they CAN have parking if they want it just cant require it via zoning.

    I guess the question becomes, does the property owner want low income or not. I'm guessing not.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Celticguy For This Post:

    Jarod (09-24-2022)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,630
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,269 Times in 13,402 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 841 Times in 800 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    from the article:



    so they CAN have parking if they want it just cant require it via zoning.

    I guess the question becomes, does the property owner want low income or not. I'm guessing not.
    The state wants low income housing to be built in large numbers. Want to be it cities and such still allow parking the state will just up this to a total ban? After all, people in low income housing should have no say in their pathetic lives according to the Left's actions...

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,946
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 5,067 Times in 3,417 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 643 Times in 611 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    If your business is within a half mile of a transit (eg., bus) stop, you will no longer be able to build parking spaces or a parking lot to accommodate your customers. If you are building apartments, you can't provide parking spaces for your tenants. If you are a car dealer... Well, you get the idea here. The state of California expects you to take the bus or other public transit everywhere like a good little peasant.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/real...29775aa0a4710b

    So, I guess this means people won't need those mandated electric cars after all...
    OMG. You are a complete idiot. They didn't ban parking. They banned mandated parking

    Citing the need to address California’s twin crises of housing affordability and climate change, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that bars local governments from mandating parking spaces as part of most development near transit stops.
    There is nothing banning parking. They only said parking can not be a requirement imposed by local governments before approving construction.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Poor Richard Saunders For This Post:

    AProudLefty (09-24-2022), evince (09-24-2022), Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022), LurchAddams (09-25-2022)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    42,179
    Thanks
    27,003
    Thanked 20,172 Times in 14,710 Posts
    Groans
    1,437
    Groaned 952 Times in 936 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    If your business is within a half mile of a transit (eg., bus) stop, you will no longer be able to build parking spaces or a parking lot to accommodate your customers. If you are building apartments, you can't provide parking spaces for your tenants. If you are a car dealer... Well, you get the idea here. The state of California expects you to take the bus or other public transit everywhere like a good little peasant.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/real...29775aa0a4710b

    So, I guess this means people won't need those mandated electric cars after all...
    And they wonder why people are leaving California.
    IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
    Biden/Harris 2024
    IT'S A NO BRAINER!


  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,630
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,269 Times in 13,402 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 841 Times in 800 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    OMG. You are a complete idiot. They didn't ban parking. They banned mandated parking


    There is nothing banning parking. They only said parking can not be a requirement imposed by local governments before approving construction.


    If cities do nothing, the next step for the Left is banning it.

  10. The Following User Groans At T. A. Gardner For This Awful Post:

    LurchAddams (09-25-2022)

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Callinectes (09-24-2022)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,946
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 5,067 Times in 3,417 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 643 Times in 611 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post


    If cities do nothing, the next step for the Left is banning it.
    ROFLMAO. Sure. Because developers would never include parking in their development unless the city forced them to.

    Frankly, you are a complete idiot.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Poor Richard Saunders For This Post:

    AProudLefty (09-24-2022), evince (09-24-2022), Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022), LurchAddams (09-25-2022)

  14. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    The state wants low income housing to be built in large numbers. Want to be it cities and such still allow parking the state will just up this to a total ban? After all, people in low income housing should have no say in their pathetic lives according to the Left's actions...

    yes I understand govt wants more low income housing but lets face itany developer will opt for high income over low to maximize his profits.

    And a ban will more likely mean no development.

    Cali needs to quit developing, you cant handle the numbers of people you already have.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    If your business is within a half mile of a transit (eg., bus) stop, you will no longer be able to build parking spaces or a parking lot to accommodate your customers. If you are building apartments, you can't provide parking spaces for your tenants. If you are a car dealer... Well, you get the idea here. The state of California expects you to take the bus or other public transit everywhere like a good little peasant.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/real...29775aa0a4710b

    So, I guess this means people won't need those mandated electric cars after all...
    This is actually good legislation. Everyone here complains there's too much traffic, congestion blah, blah, blah along with completely unaffordable housing. How do you deal with that? Build more housing near public transportation that allows those who want to to get around without a car. Previously the law required a minimum parking amount which was a huge cost burden and contributed to preventing development. If you're building out in the burbs away from public transit then yes you need to provide more parking. But if you're building right next to BART and other public transportation then you need less.

    This will help provide more housing. It's a good thing.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    AProudLefty (09-24-2022), evince (09-24-2022), Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    The state wants low income housing to be built in large numbers. Want to be it cities and such still allow parking the state will just up this to a total ban? After all, people in low income housing should have no say in their pathetic lives according to the Left's actions...
    This isn't about low income. It will be market rate housing that gets built (now California cities require a certain amount of that housing to be deemed 'affordable' but this isn't Section 8 type housing they will be building).

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    AProudLefty (09-24-2022), Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    And they wonder why people are leaving California.
    People leave California for multiple reasons but a big one is the cost of housing (living). This legislation will allow for more development. That is a good thing. More development will help drive down costs.

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    AProudLefty (09-24-2022), evince (09-24-2022), Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022), LurchAddams (09-25-2022)

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,397
    Thanks
    72,428
    Thanked 35,739 Times in 27,222 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,587 Times in 18,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022)

  23. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    71,403
    Thanks
    3,133
    Thanked 15,102 Times in 12,629 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,441 Times in 1,385 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If you are still living in California you might think about getting out while you still can.
    I choose my own words like the Americans of olden times........before this dystopia arrived.

    DARK AGES SUCK!

  24. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    yes I understand govt wants more low income housing but lets face itany developer will opt for high income over low to maximize his profits.

    And a ban will more likely mean no development.

    Cali needs to quit developing, you cant handle the numbers of people you already have.
    We moved to California in 1981. At that time people complained the state was already overcrowded and they were passing anti-development/anti-growth measures. And look where we are 40 years later; most wealth in the country and highest poverty rate and housing prices that are off the charts. NIMBYism is like a religion here and many share your belief that the state should quit developing (it's one of the few things those on the right and left agree upon).

    That's why the YIMBY movement was created. Population growth in this country isn't going to slow down so stopping development only puts upwards pressure on housing costs.

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (09-24-2022), LurchAddams (09-25-2022)

  26. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,397
    Thanks
    72,428
    Thanked 35,739 Times in 27,222 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,587 Times in 18,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye10 View Post
    If you are still living in California you might think about getting out while you still can.
    The same dumb shit republicans have said for decades while California kicks their ass economically


    We are the 5 largest economy in the world

    Oh and guess what


    If you take just Latino Americans into consideration


    Latinos are the 5th largest economy in the world

    Latinos are great in the small business area for an economy


    Give them a generation or two and they will be sitting as CEOs of large companies


    Yet the right hates them

    Go figure

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    LurchAddams (09-25-2022)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 11-25-2020, 05:15 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-05-2018, 12:12 AM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-25-2013, 11:16 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-04-2012, 01:40 AM
  5. The parking lots are full again.
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 08:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •