Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 112

Thread: The FBI legalizes robbery for themselves

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,827
    Thanks
    19,711
    Thanked 9,447 Times in 7,737 Posts
    Groans
    835
    Groaned 509 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    So did the FBI open up innocent peoples' Safety Deposit boxes or no?

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,079
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,937 Times in 13,200 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Once again, the title of your thread is both a lie and in keeping with WSE anti-FBI ideology. There's no mention of the FBI changing the law.

    How deep are you in with a militia or other WSE group, Chief?

    From the link: "U.S. Private Vaults has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to launder drug money, and the investigation is continuing, she said.

    The plaintiffs in the class-action suit have asked U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner to declare the raid unconstitutional. If he grants the request, it could force the FBI to return millions of dollars to box holders whose assets it has tried to confiscate.

    It could also spoil an unknown number of criminal investigations by blocking prosecutors from using any evidence or information acquired in the raid, including guns and drugs."


    It's being worked out in court but, IMO, the agents on scene may have fucked over a few innocent people...and that should never happen. Fuck the criminals and drug dealer scum. How many of them were WSEs? LOL
    No, it's not. The FBI looted an estimated $68 million from those safety deposit boxes. They opened every box in the facility and emptied it. They didn't press charges against anyone afterwards. They fucked lots and lots of innocent people. The FBI shouldn't be able to get a search warrant that allows them to open hundreds of safety deposit boxes without specific reasons to do so for each and every box they opened.
    If they suspected someone of criminal activity, they could have found out which box was that person's and tailored a search warrant to open that specific box.

    This short of shit used to happen in Arizona, but the legislature here passed a law requiring law enforcement to go to court after such a confiscation and hold a hearing where the person who had their shit confiscated gets a say, before they can keep it. If they don't, they're required to return the confiscated items. The Arizona law put the onus on law enforcement to prove that the confiscation was justified, not the person that had their stuff taken.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Matt Dillon (09-25-2022)

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Once again, the title of your thread is both a lie and in keeping with WSE anti-FBI ideology. There's no mention of the FBI changing the law.

    How deep are you in with a militia or other WSE group, Chief?

    From the link: "U.S. Private Vaults has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to launder drug money, and the investigation is continuing, she said.

    The plaintiffs in the class-action suit have asked U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner to declare the raid unconstitutional. If he grants the request, it could force the FBI to return millions of dollars to box holders whose assets it has tried to confiscate.

    It could also spoil an unknown number of criminal investigations by blocking prosecutors from using any evidence or information acquired in the raid, including guns and drugs."


    It's being worked out in court but, IMO, the agents on scene may have fucked over a few innocent people...and that should never happen. Fuck the criminals and drug dealer scum. How many of them were WSEs? LOL
    T.A. doesn't care about the facts.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to AProudLefty For This Post:

    Doc Dutch (09-25-2022)

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    So did the FBI open up innocent peoples' Safety Deposit boxes or no?
    It would seem so. Not the point.

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    T.A. doesn't care about the facts.
    Then give the facts.
    Don't be afraid to see what you see

  8. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    Then give the facts.
    Already done, Satan's clown.

  9. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Already done, Satan's clown.
    No, you didn't. No facts given by you.

    Now, back to the chess. Why did you rush your rook to the baseline?
    Don't be afraid to see what you see

  10. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    No, you didn't. No facts given by you.

    Now, back to the chess. Why did you rush your rook to the baseline?
    It was a checkmate, fuckclown.

  11. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    It was a checkmate, fuckclown.
    No, it wasn't. It was check. You're dumb AND a liar.
    Don't be afraid to see what you see

  12. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    No, it wasn't. It was check. You're dumb AND a liar.
    You cannot chess.

  13. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    You cannot chess.
    All you had to do was move your bishop to lock his rook in place...then take your rook to the baseline. That would have been checkmate not check. Why didn't you do that?
    Don't be afraid to see what you see

  14. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    All you had to do was move your bishop to lock his rook in place...then take your rook to the baseline. That would have been checkmate not check. Why didn't you do that?
    No idea what u r talking abt.

  15. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    No idea what u r talking abt.
    Liar.
    Don't be afraid to see what you see

  16. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,827
    Thanks
    19,711
    Thanked 9,447 Times in 7,737 Posts
    Groans
    835
    Groaned 509 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    It would seem so. Not the point.
    Seems to me that's exactly the point.

  17. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,920
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,762 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    Seems to me that's exactly the point.
    No it isn't. US Private Vaults used those innocent people to their advantage to mask their criminal activities. That is on them and they should sue their asses off.

Similar Threads

  1. Democratic House legalizes Marijuana....
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 12-22-2020, 11:16 AM
  2. Canada legalizes beastiality
    By J Craft in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-01-2018, 06:03 PM
  3. France Legalizes Medical Marijuana Use
    By The Dude in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-30-2013, 06:49 PM
  4. Connecticut legalizes gay marriage
    By Cancel3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-12-2008, 05:52 PM
  5. Mexico city legalizes abortion.
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-25-2007, 11:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •