Republicans Won’t Commit to Accepting Election Results

**Blackwater Lunchbreak** · 09-21-2022, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by Flash

The basis for all conspiracy theories.

If there is no evidence why do you think there was voter fraud?

because drop boxes are not secure. there is no i.d. check.

**Flash** · 09-21-2022, 07:24 PM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

because drop boxes are not secure. there is no i.d. check.

Which does not mean any fraud occurred. There were not enough votes cast in the drop boxes to change the election outcome. Even if a person did not have an ID the ballot had to be sent to a registered voter.

**domer76** · 09-21-2022, 07:36 PM

Originally Posted by Flash

Which does not mean any fraud occurred. There were not enough votes cast in the drop boxes to change the election outcome. Even if a person did not have an ID the ballot had to be sent to a registered voter.

Trying to have a coherent conversation with AHZ is an exercise in futility.

**domer76** · 09-21-2022, 07:37 PM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

because drop boxes are not secure. there is no i.d. check.

Same ID check as with mail-in. Right?

**Hawkeye10** · 09-21-2022, 07:38 PM

No Not Moron plays a game saying "I promise to not accuse you of cheating no matter what you do" .

But the Revolution seems to think that they have R's so cowed that they might.

**Blackwater Lunchbreak** · 09-22-2022, 05:58 AM

Originally Posted by domer76

Same ID check as with mail-in. Right?

if you mean no i.d. check, then yes.

**Blackwater Lunchbreak** · 09-22-2022, 06:01 AM

an election is not a trial.

there is a burden of proof on an election to provide transparency and retrace-ablity, and security. an election does need to prove innocence.

voting needs to be one day, in person, with photo id verified, paper only.

**domer76** · 09-22-2022, 08:35 AM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

if you mean no i.d. check, then yes.

So, with that logic, why is one OK and the other not?

**domer76** · 09-22-2022, 08:36 AM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

an election is not a trial.

there is a burden of proof on an election to provide transparency and retrace-ablity, and security. an election does need to prove innocence.

voting needs to be one day, in person, with photo id verified, paper only.

But it isn’t. Anywhere. And it hasn’t been that way for a very long time.

Live with it.

**Blackwater Lunchbreak** · 09-22-2022, 09:04 AM

Originally Posted by domer76

But it isn’t. Anywhere. And it hasn’t been that way for a very long time.

Live with it.

no.

we demand election integrity.

**Blackwater Lunchbreak** · 09-22-2022, 09:09 AM

Originally Posted by domer76

So, with that logic, why is one OK and the other not?

they both are not ok.

**domer76** · 09-22-2022, 09:44 AM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

no.

we demand election integrity.

Demand all you want, pally. Mail-in is here to stay.

**domer76** · 09-22-2022, 09:45 AM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

they both are not ok.

Looks like those who make the rules disagree with you.

Sucks, huh?

**Blackwater Lunchbreak** · 09-22-2022, 04:38 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

Looks like those who make the rules disagree with you.

Sucks, huh?

spoken like a true totalitarian.

**domer76** · 09-22-2022, 04:45 PM

Originally Posted by AssHatZombie

spoken like a true totalitarian.

You see, pally boy, in a democratic republic or whatever you prefer to call our form of government, there are people who make the rules. They are called our representatives. Then, there are those that make decisions whether those rules pass constitutional muster. They constitute the judicial branch.

Nothing totalitarian about it.

It must also suck for you that you are so ignorant of our government.