Judge Orders Justice Dept. to Redact and Release Version of Affidavit Used to Search

[ExpressLane]

I expect one of two outcomes from this late next week--assuming the DoJ doesn't stall release:

1. The affidavit will be heavily redacted and just fuel suspicions of those that already had them, while doing nothing to bolster the case of those that approve of the raid.

or

2. The affidavit will be so broad and vague that in addition to being forced to release it, the DoJ takes yet another blow to their credibility while the MSM and supporters of the raid dissemble and equivocate trying to make it sound like the raid was truly unbiased and legitimate.

Exactly.

[ExpressLane]

That has ZERO to do with the affidavit itself and is virtually irrelevant here. The question on the table is Will the affidavit support the warrant as written and issued? I suspect it won't. The search might still be justifiable, but not using the sweeping and vague language the warrant had in it. My suspicion is that the affidavit will not support the search warrant as written.

And remember Garland himself said the DOJ likes to use the least intrusive methods possible. We need to know why they could not have just subpoenaed the things they took.

[BartenderElite]

And remember Garland himself said the DOJ likes to use the least intrusive methods possible. We need to know why they could not have just subpoenaed the things they took.

What makes you think we won't?

This is an ongoing investigation. All of the facts will come out. Not sure why folks can't just let it play out.

[ExpressLane]

Everything you write is stupid.

No it's just that you are to dumb to understand.

[ExpressLane]

You forgot that a list of everything taken from MAL has been made public. Have you bothered to look at it, and if so, you will know exactly why the FBI was there.

So do you the reason the warrant allowed those things to be removed?

[PostmodernProphet]

How do you know they are not?

because we know you always lie.....

[PostmodernProphet]

Can you post any proof that I was wrong about anything I ever said here?

Of course not!

dude....can you link us to something you got right?.....lol.....

[PostmodernProphet]

Trump has already admitted that he was holding documents he wasn't entitled to, so just fuck of. You are brain dead.

link it?....

[PostmodernProphet]

No there can be photos of him wiping his ass with the American flag and pissing on an original copy of the constitution and they would love it.
.

odd....I find it far more likely there would be photos of you wiping your ass with the American flag than of Trump.......I'm sure most folks here would find that more likely as well......

[ExpressLane]

What makes you think we won't?

This is an ongoing investigation. All of the facts will come out. Not sure why folks can't just let it play out.

I want to know what the overwhelming need was for this warrant instead of a subpoena.

[ExpressLane]

odd....I find it far more likely there would be photos of you wiping your ass with the American flag than of Trump.......I'm sure most folks here would find that more likely as well......

Truth!

[Matt Dillon]

Wouldn't be surprised, just not sure of which of any number of felonies Trump has committed will be the first indictment.

Which one is the first, you fucktard?

Hurting your butt doesn't count.

Let's see you name one.

[AProudLefty]

I want to know what the overwhelming need was for this warrant instead of a subpoena.

You do know.

[Matt Dillon]

You do know.

So what is it?

Pretend I'm from Mizzuruh and show me.

Be sure and warsh your hands first, though.

I kill me!

[Hawkeye10]

So what is it?

Pretend I'm from Mizzuruh and show me.

Be sure and warsh your hands first, though.

I kill me!

Riiight.