Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 124

Thread: Judge Orders Justice Dept. to Redact and Release Version of Affidavit Used to Search

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default Judge Orders Justice Dept. to Redact and Release Version of Affidavit Used to Search

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the government to redact and ultimately release a version of the highly sensitive warrant affidavit that was used to justify a search by the F.B.I. last week of former President Donald J. Trump’s private home and club.

    Ruling from the bench, the judge, Bruce E. Reinhart, said that there were portions of the affidavit that “could be presumptively unsealed.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/18/u...t-warrant.html

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,080
    Thanks
    147,007
    Thanked 83,427 Times in 53,292 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Was just reading the decision on a different site. Looks like he's giving them more time to show why parts of it should remain sealed. I hope that that information is not provided to #TRE45ON's attorneys, or he'll be posting it on Untruth Social this evening.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  3. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    AProudLefty (08-18-2022), evince (08-18-2022), Guno צְבִי (08-18-2022), LurchAddams (08-19-2022)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default Judge appears willing to unveil some of Mar-a-Lago affidavit

    The Justice Department also revealed during Thursday’s hearing that the investigation into whether Trump illegally stored classified records at his Florida estate – and potentially violated the Espionage Act – is still “in its early stages.”

    Jay Bratt, a top Justice Department national security prosecutor, had argued that the affidavit should remain hidden from the public. Unsealing it, he said, would provide a “road map” of the investigation — which is in its “early stages” — and expose the next steps to be taken by federal agents and prosecutors.

    https://apnews.com/article/florida-d...9a2a56c4ffc9a7

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    30,134
    Thanks
    2,810
    Thanked 11,069 Times in 8,417 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 595 Times in 591 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Was just reading the decision on a different site. Looks like he's giving them more time to show why parts of it should remain sealed. I hope that that information is not provided to #TRE45ON's attorneys, or he'll be posting it on Untruth Social this evening.
    You wouldn't want the truth getting out. You're a raging imbecile

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yakuda For This Post:

    ExpressLane (08-18-2022), Grokmaster (08-18-2022)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    30,134
    Thanks
    2,810
    Thanked 11,069 Times in 8,417 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 595 Times in 591 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the government to redact and ultimately release a version of the highly sensitive warrant affidavit that was used to justify a search by the F.B.I. last week of former President Donald J. Trump’s private home and club.

    Ruling from the bench, the judge, Bruce E. Reinhart, said that there were portions of the affidavit that “could be presumptively unsealed.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/18/u...t-warrant.html
    Why don't we just show the whole thing? Why all the pussyfooting let's get everything out in the open. Sox fucking years and it's just more of the same old bullshit.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yakuda For This Post:

    ExpressLane (08-18-2022), Grokmaster (08-18-2022)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    30,134
    Thanks
    2,810
    Thanked 11,069 Times in 8,417 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 595 Times in 591 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the government to redact and ultimately release a version of the highly sensitive warrant affidavit that was used to justify a search by the F.B.I. last week of former President Donald J. Trump’s private home and club.

    Ruling from the bench, the judge, Bruce E. Reinhart, said that there were portions of the affidavit that “could be presumptively unsealed.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/18/u...t-warrant.html
    Why don't we just show the whole thing? Why all the pussyfooting let's get everything out in the open. Sox fucking years and it's just more of the same old bullshit.

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Yakuda For This Post:

    ExpressLane (08-18-2022), Grokmaster (08-18-2022), Matt Dillon (08-19-2022)

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    Why don't we just show the whole thing? Why all the pussyfooting let's get everything out in the open. Sox fucking years and it's just more of the same old bullshit.
    You would just love to have the names of all those involved published, so your kind can threaten, attack, and destroy these people , their families and their homes.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    AProudLefty (08-18-2022), Nomad (08-18-2022), ThatOwlWoman (08-18-2022)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    30,134
    Thanks
    2,810
    Thanked 11,069 Times in 8,417 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 595 Times in 591 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    You would just love to have the names of all those involved published, so your kind can threaten, attack, and destroy these people , their families and their homes.
    Put it out in the open and there would be no reason to question the integrity of leftists. I personally never question the integrity of leftist because I know you people dont have any. But here is the inescapable fact, you pieces of shit wouldnt hesitate to publish names just like susan rice did so save us your sanctimonious bullshit. You people really think everyone is a dumb as you are don't you??????

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Yakuda For This Post:

    Celticguy (08-18-2022), ExpressLane (08-18-2022), Grokmaster (08-18-2022)

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,669
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,307 Times in 13,426 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 843 Times in 802 Posts

    Default

    I expect one of two outcomes from this late next week--assuming the DoJ doesn't stall release:

    1. The affidavit will be heavily redacted and just fuel suspicions of those that already had them, while doing nothing to bolster the case of those that approve of the raid.

    or

    2. The affidavit will be so broad and vague that in addition to being forced to release it, the DoJ takes yet another blow to their credibility while the MSM and supporters of the raid dissemble and equivocate trying to make it sound like the raid was truly unbiased and legitimate.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    ExpressLane (08-18-2022), Grokmaster (08-18-2022)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,201
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,904 Times in 21,666 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Was just reading the decision on a different site. Looks like he's giving them more time to show why parts of it should remain sealed. I hope that that information is not provided to #TRE45ON's attorneys, or he'll be posting it on Untruth Social this evening.
    Not sure he is posting it, because it might harm him. Trump wants the info from it so he can figure out whats happening and what they are investigating. He wants to know who the informant is.

    The judge did not give it to the Trump attorneys. He just said some of it can be public, let me see what the Government proposes.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (08-18-2022)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    Put it out in the open and there would be no reason to question the integrity of leftists. I personally never question the integrity of leftist because I know you people dont have any. But here is the inescapable fact, you pieces of shit wouldnt hesitate to publish names just like susan rice did so save us your sanctimonious bullshit. You people really think everyone is a dumb as you are don't you??????
    Please bitch, moan, and cry as much as you like, but the names and other information will not be made public. Its a shame we have to worry about violence from your side directed at innocent people.

  20. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    I expect one of two outcomes from this late next week--assuming the DoJ doesn't stall release:

    1. The affidavit will be heavily redacted and just fuel suspicions of those that already had them, while doing nothing to bolster the case of those that approve of the raid.

    or

    2. The affidavit will be so broad and vague that in addition to being forced to release it, the DoJ takes yet another blow to their credibility while the MSM and supporters of the raid dissemble and equivocate trying to make it sound like the raid was truly unbiased and legitimate.
    As Rep. Kinzinger said, you treat Trump like the Christ.

  21. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Not sure he is posting it, because it might harm him. Trump wants the info from it so he can figure out whats happening and what they are investigating. He wants to know who the informant is.

    The judge did not give it to the Trump attorneys. He just said some of it can be public, let me see what the Government proposes.
    I don't understand why these media companies want this to be public.

  22. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    I expect one of two outcomes from this late next week--assuming the DoJ doesn't stall release:

    1. The affidavit will be heavily redacted and just fuel suspicions of those that already had them, while doing nothing to bolster the case of those that approve of the raid.

    or

    2. The affidavit will be so broad and vague that in addition to being forced to release it, the DoJ takes yet another blow to their credibility while the MSM and supporters of the raid dissemble and equivocate trying to make it sound like the raid was truly unbiased and legitimate.
    The Donald has basically admitted that he possessed documents that he shouldn't have, some of which were top secret. That in itself justifies the FBI search.

  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    I would have liked to have seen some of the items seized from trumps estate to include a private emails server that had classified emails and documents on it, with evidence that they scrubbed the server and a box full of broken cell phones..........the brain collapses of liberals would have been awesome to see
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

Similar Threads

  1. “Justice Dept. seeks to unseal search warrant of Trump home”
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-11-2022, 02:28 PM
  2. Justice Dept. seeks to unseal search warrant of Trump home
    By BidenPresident in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-11-2022, 01:32 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-16-2022, 01:02 PM
  4. Judge orders Justice Dept. to release Trump obstruction memo
    By BidenPresident in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-05-2021, 01:14 PM
  5. Judge orders release of Clinton email search warrant
    By Stretch in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2016, 03:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •