You should be directing this response to Frank, not to me. Pay attention.
Yes he did, dumbass. He said "a fetus is not a human" (IOW, it's a "fetus", it is NOT a "human"). He is treating 'fetus' as if it were a separate species from the human species, because he's trying to dehumanize the object in order to make it more palatable to condone killing it for convenience.
Human is a particular species. Fetus is a particular stage of life development for various species, including the human species that is being discussed here.
In the context of this thread, a fetus is a human being that is in a particular stage of human life (after embryo and before infant).
Of course I shouldn't have to state the obvious, but Frank is a special kind of stupid and thus requires the obvious to be stated.
Now you're just repeating Frank's stupidity from above. You are now likewise referring to 'fetus' as if it were some species separate from the human species. You are likewise dehumanizing the subject in order to make it more palatable to condone killing humans for convenience. ("It's not a human, so it's okay to do") Absolutely disgusting. This is the sort of thinking that brought about the Holocaust.
Here, you are getting into wordplay. I'm not going down this rabbit hole. You are condoning the killing of humans for convenience, and that's all there is to it.
There is a human to kill, and you condone the killing of that human for the convenience of another human.
I was mocking Frank, moron. The fallacy belongs to him, not me. Pay attention.
Bookmarks