Food Inflation Hits Highs Not Seen Since 1979

[MAGA MAN]

How does manufacturing contribute to GDP, if you think manufacturing is what grows an economy and not spending?

Again, manufacturing grows the economy by creating things of value that people are willing to purchase.

Wealth is created by taking something of a lesser value and transforming it into something of a greater value.

Democrats are really dumb about this simple concept. For example, the Cash for Clunkers boondoggle. FedCo paid people to destroy older cars. So they took something of value, and transformed it into something of lesser value, the exact opposite of creating wealth. But since FedCo spent money, they think it was good for the economy.

Then, not so soon later, the cost of used cars skyrocketed. And Democrats see no connection.

It would be laughable if it wasn't so sad.

[MAGA MAN]

Ah, but I did quote you in full, I just didn't quote the additional garbage you wrote.

Again you can't man-up and admit a simple truth. You create an excuse and call it garbage because it destroys your position.

[MAGA MAN]

I said you ran your big, fat mouth about a stolen election for two months, only to chicken out the one day it mattered.

This was destroyed earlier by a post of mine that you selectively edited.

[LV426]

Again, manufacturing grows the economy by creating things of value that people are willing to purchase. .

OK, but what you haven't done is make the connection between manufacturing and growing an economy.

Merely manufacturing things doesn't grow an economy...what grows the economy is when those things you manufactured are sold.

The economy does not grow by $1 if you are manufacturing something...but the economy does grow if that $1 is used to buy the thing you manufactured.

The reason why Conservative economics always ends up in a recession is because you don't accept the sole truth of economics, that demand, not supply, is what drives the economy.

That's why every single Conservative President since Nixon has left behind a stinking wreck of an economy for the Democrat to clean up.

[LV426]

Wealth is created by taking something of a lesser value and transforming it into something of a greater value.

No, wealth is created in the exchange of currency for goods.

THAT is how wealth is created.

Wealth is not created by stocking your warehouse with surplus manufactured goods...that doesn't create wealth, that creates debt...because you have the debt you incurred when you manufactured the product that can only be recouped by sales and revenue.

Conservatives always fail because they do not understand this principle of economics.

[LV426]

Democrats are really dumb about this simple concept. For example, the Cash for Clunkers boondoggle. FedCo paid people to destroy older cars. So they took something of value, and transformed it into something of lesser value, the exact opposite of creating wealth. But since FedCo spent money, they think it was good for the economy.

The net result of that was economic growth and job creation, so I guess you oppose growth and job creation because you can't wrap your head around the economics of either.

[LV426]

Then, not so soon later, the cost of used cars skyrocketed.

Well because of demand.

Do you not support supply and demand?

[LV426]

Again you can't man-up and admit a simple truth. You create an excuse and call it garbage because it destroys your position.

LMAO!

I quoted your sentence in full and responded to that quoted sentence in full.

What are you complaining about?

[LV426]

This was destroyed earlier by a post of mine that you selectively edited.

You might think so and you're only thinking that because of how I'm schooling you on economics on this thread.

So you're searching for something to make me feel as insecure as I make you feel all the time, and that's something only a fucking pussy would do.

[LV426]

This was destroyed earlier by a post of mine that you selectively edited.

I didn't selectively edit anything...I quoted the first sentence of your post and responded to that.

Why are you lying? Anyone can look at the thread and see for themselves.

[MAGA MAN]

I didn't selectively edit anything...I quoted the first sentence of your post and responded to that.

Why are you lying? Anyone can look at the thread and see for themselves.

You selectively edited the portion that destroyed your position.

[LV426]

You selectively edited the portion that destroyed your position.

No I didn't. It was the whole sentence, period and all.

You're trying to say that I didn't quote your entire post, but I wasn't bothering to address the rest of your entire post.

I was focusing on the first sentence you wrote in order for YOU to organize your thoughts since they're so erratic.

You're welcome for that, by the way.

I'm out here helping you organize your thoughts and this shit is the thanks I get?

[MAGA MAN]

No I didn't. It was the whole sentence, period and all.

You're trying to say that I didn't quote your entire post, but I wasn't bothering to address the rest of your entire post.

I was focusing on the first sentence you wrote in order for YOU to organize your thoughts since they're so erratic.

You're welcome for that, by the way.

I'm out here helping you organize your thoughts and this shit is the thanks I get?

You selectively edited the portion that destroyed your position.

[LV426]

You selectively edited the portion that destroyed your position.

Anyone can see the thread and see that you're lying.

I didn't selectively edit anything...I quoted that sentence in full and responded to it for your benefit.

A little gratitude would be nice.

[LV426]

Your lie exposed:
Attachment 22991

Also, kind of a bitch move to not include the link to the actual post...but innuendo is pretty much all you're capable of at this point.

So when we look at this thumbnail, what do we see? We see you being quoted in full, not selectively.