Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 91

Thread: Judge Who Authorized MAL Search Previously Recused Self from Trump-Clinton Lawsuit

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    16,321
    Thanks
    1,015
    Thanked 9,858 Times in 6,092 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 1,552 Times in 1,468 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    None of this would have happened, had not Trump have illegally taken these documents in the first place. This isn't the judges fault, or the fault of the FBI, the blame sole rests on Trump.
    Very true. That said, anatta would STILL be a scumbag and a traitor. That part still would be true.

  2. The Following User Groans At Concart For This Awful Post:

    Primavera (08-11-2022)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,400
    Thanks
    13,166
    Thanked 22,343 Times in 15,662 Posts
    Groans
    248
    Groaned 1,948 Times in 1,859 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Anatta, as usual, is a fucking moron. A subpoena WAS issued for these documents months ago and trump hid them. It appears someone ratted him out. FBI, DOJ, the judge and everyone involved obviously believed this source was completely reliable or they would not have done this. Anatta is a traitor. He’s proven that over and over again. He’s just Putins puppet trying to create chaos like a good little useful idiot. He plays the role so well that he’s become a cliche. A worthless Putin mouthpiece. He is a disgrace of a human being. No need to defend this judge to a disgusting piece of shit traitor like Anatta. The judge cares about his country. Anatta does not. Next?
    total lies..all of it from the most stupid partisan ever..

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Primavera (08-11-2022)

  5. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    20,209
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 7,706 Times in 5,034 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,600 Times in 1,500 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    Don't you mean embossed dinner napkins? They won't find much more..unless they're adding things of their own...
    I understand that you refuse to blame Trump for theft. Its so much easier to blame everyone else, as you always do for every trump lie and deception.

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,400
    Thanks
    13,166
    Thanked 22,343 Times in 15,662 Posts
    Groans
    248
    Groaned 1,948 Times in 1,859 Posts

    Default

    DOJ should have subpoenaed documents, not raided Trump’s home
    https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...d-trumps-home/
    The decision by the Justice Department to conduct a full-scale morning raid on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home does not seem justified, based on what we know as of now. If it is true that the basis of the raid was the former president’s alleged removal of classified material from the White House, that would constitute a double standard of justice.

    There were no raids, for example, on the homes of Hillary Clinton or former Clinton administration national security adviser Sandy Berger for comparable allegations of mishandling official records in the recent past. Previous violations of the Presidential Records Act typically have been punished by administrative fines, not criminal prosecution. Perhaps there are legitimate reasons for applying a different standard to Trump’s conduct, but those are not readily obvious at this stage.

    The more appropriate action would have been for a grand jury to issue a subpoena for any boxes of material that were seized and for Trump’s private safe that was opened. That would have given Trump’s lawyers the opportunity to challenge the subpoena on various grounds — that some of the material was not classified; that previous classified material was declassified by Trump; that other documents may be covered by various privileges, such as executive or lawyer-client.

    Instead, the FBI apparently seized everything in view and will sort the documents and other material without a court deciding which ones are appropriately subject to Justice Department seizure.

    Thus, it is now up to the Justice Department and the FBI to justify their actions to the American public. They must explain why a different standard appears to have been applied to Democrats such as Clinton and Berger than to Republicans such as Trump and many of his associates.

  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    16,321
    Thanks
    1,015
    Thanked 9,858 Times in 6,092 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 1,552 Times in 1,468 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    Don't you mean embossed dinner napkins? They won't find much more..unless they're adding things of their own...
    Sure, sure. Because trump is lily white, and no one in the history of our country has been so honest. He’s actually loved by 95% of the country so there is no way he’s guilty. It has to be a frame up. Just like what he told you before the election. The only way he could lose was if Biden cheated. Right teach?? You believe trump won because he told you so?

    ROTFLMFAO!!! Man you are a sucker.

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    42,167
    Thanks
    19,137
    Thanked 14,549 Times in 11,751 Posts
    Groans
    114
    Groaned 1,043 Times in 989 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Where is your anger that this whole episode was started by trump, who illegally took these documents out of the WH?? There is no one else to blame.
    What documents did he illegally take?

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    20,209
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 7,706 Times in 5,034 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,600 Times in 1,500 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    What documents did he illegally take?
    Every single item that he has already returned or had the FBI retrieve them.

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    1,354
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 399 Times in 306 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 132 Times in 129 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Trump's lawsuit accuses Clinton, Democrat allies and current and former government officials of engaging in a racketeering conspiracy to falsely portray Trump as colluding with Russia during the 2016 election. The sweeping nature of the suit involves numerous parties and public figures.

    The recusal filing emerges as numerous media reports have surfaced about the magistrate's prior work, including donations before he was judge to President Barack Obama and Jeb Bush and work for figures associated with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    The Daily Wire also raised questions about Reinhart's impartiality toward Trump, reporting that in a 2017 Facebook social post — a year before he was named a magistrate — he challenged the 45th president's moral character after Trump attacked the late Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights icon.
    https://tennesseestar.com/2022/08/10...inton-lawsuit/
    I have his address I wonder what the fascist DOJ/FBI would do if I doxxed him like the infanticidal demons doxxed the Supreme Court justices.

  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    23,740
    Thanks
    23,873
    Thanked 9,406 Times in 6,728 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,161 Times in 2,046 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Post proof (a link) that someone rattted Trump out.

    I'll wait.
    Lincoln Project co-founder speculates if Jared Kushner was the mole who sold out Trump to the feds

    https://www.rawstory.com/who-sold-trump-to-feds/
    The Big Steal = The Big Lie.

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    42,167
    Thanks
    19,137
    Thanked 14,549 Times in 11,751 Posts
    Groans
    114
    Groaned 1,043 Times in 989 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Sure, sure. Because trump is a lily white, honest and is actually loved by 95% of the country so there is no way he’s guilty. It has to be a frame up. Just like what he told you before the election. The only way he could lose was if Biden cheated. Right teach?? You believe trump won because he told you so?

    ROTFLMFAO!!! Man you are a sucker.
    Again, I'm not sure where you get these ideas of yours...Not from any of my posts, as usual... And that's retired teach, btw... (I think you need to make the ROTFLMAO you're signature...then you don't have to keep retyping it every time...)

  13. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,400
    Thanks
    13,166
    Thanked 22,343 Times in 15,662 Posts
    Groans
    248
    Groaned 1,948 Times in 1,859 Posts

    Default

    the question is extreme predjudice by the judge with his prior recusal on the Trump/Clinton lawsuit
    as well as the writings on social media by the judge..

  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    42,167
    Thanks
    19,137
    Thanked 14,549 Times in 11,751 Posts
    Groans
    114
    Groaned 1,043 Times in 989 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Every single item that he has already returned or had the FBI retrieve them.
    What documents?

  15. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    1,354
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 399 Times in 306 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 132 Times in 129 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    Lincoln Project co-founder speculates if Jared Kushner was the mole who sold out Trump to the feds

    https://www.rawstory.com/who-sold-trump-to-feds/
    The Lincoln Project is a child grooming gang you dumb fuck.

  16. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    20,209
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 7,706 Times in 5,034 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,600 Times in 1,500 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    What documents?
    The National Archives said Friday that documents former President Donald Trump removed from the White House in early 2021 included classified national security information and that it has contacted the Department of Justice about the matter.

    The agency "has identified items marked as classified national security information within the boxes" that Trump stored at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach. Fla., the National Archives and Records Administration said in a letter to Rep, Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.

    The letter – signed by David S. Ferriero, the national archivist – also said that "because NARA identified classified information in the boxes, NARA staff has been in communication with the Department of Justice."

  17. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    1,354
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 399 Times in 306 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 132 Times in 129 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Every single item that he has already returned or had the FBI retrieve them.
    And at most you send a subpoena, it's not illegal for the President to work from a second home and he can't be prosecuted for mishandling classified documents as he has the plenary power to declassify anything he wants, this was a political power play from an unelected illegitimate authoritarian police state.

Similar Threads

  1. Trump* appointed Judge rejects lawsuit!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-28-2020, 01:46 PM
  2. Judge greenlights subpoenas in Trump Hotel lawsuit
    By guno in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-03-2018, 09:56 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-28-2017, 02:09 PM
  4. Judge orders release of Clinton email search warrant
    By Stretch in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2016, 03:56 PM
  5. Taking Liberties: A lawsuit worthy of a Google search
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-28-2012, 03:53 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •