Members banned from this thread: ThatOwlWoman, Guno צְבִי and Doc Dutch |
They were there with the intent of influencing Justices to change their minds...clearly intimidation.
I see an "intent" requirement. One can't intend to do something if that can not occur.
How could a majority opinion be leaked if there had been no vote to create a majority? I would love to see your explanation of that so that there can be no doubt as to whether Alito was writing the majority opinion or not.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Pobre, Pobre, Pobre...the word "excessive" was in the post about Mr. Pelosi, the drunk.
I responded to you now about your erroneous post asking how a S.C. justice could be influenced "after the decision was already made."
How old are you, Pobre?
Good grief.
It was a PRELIMINARY vote, Pobre. It was leaked and then the illegal protests occurred at the homes of the S.C. Justices BEFORE the final vote.
You can't follow two subjects at the same time, Poor Pobre.
Have someone read this to you very slowly, Pobre:
DOJ allowing illegal protests outside SCOTUS justices' homes ...
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › doj-allows-illegal-pr...
Jun 21, 2022 — The Department of Justice has failed to enforce a federal statute which prohibits protests, pickets, and other forms of intimidation outside ...
I realize that there are polysyllabic words in the law but...
Last edited by Earl; 07-07-2022 at 09:24 AM.
I'll give you one more free tutorial, Pobre.
It doesn't matter if the Justices' minds are changed.
It is illegal to protest in front of a S.C Justice's home in an attempt to intimidate a Justice into changing his/her voter.
There was even a murder attempt:
Nicholas Roske charged with attempting to murder Supreme ...
https://www.cbsnews.com › news › nicholas-roske-brett...
Jun 9, 2022 — He is charged with attempt to murder a Supreme Court justice. If convicted, Roske faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison
Entiendes?
So, let's go down this rabbit hole. Simply showing up and yelling is proof they have intention?
Showing up with a weapon is not the same thing as showing up with a sign. But do you think showing up with a weapon is proof of intent? Is showing up with a sign or a flag proof of intent?
By the way, murdering a judge isn't going to change their vote so it makes it hard to call that intent to influence.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
It does appear that Pobre has left the building.
Dragging his shield, not on his shield.
Perhaps he knew that I was going to charge him for the tutorials. ''lol
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
You are not the most important thing in my life. But I do sometimes suffer fools like you.
By the way.. you still haven't responded to this which is the list of how you are a fool.
So to recap.
You don't understand the meaning of the word "excessive".
You deny you posted the word "excessive" when you clearly did.
You used a source where you got the word "excessive" and posted it as if it was authoritative.
Are you ready to admit that you used the word "excessive" in a post?
Are you ready to admit that you failed to understand the meaning of the word?
Are you ready to admit that you used a source as your authority that you later claimed was simply a lawyer's ad?
When I use the same source and point out how it disputes your failure to understand the meaning of "excessive" you claim the source is not authoritative but only an ad for lawyers.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
statute is clear and expansive even to juries their signage is clear (some even threatening signs) the fact we almost had an assassination is clear.
They can use their free speech rules anywhere but near a judges/court officer/ jury member home .. whether it extends past a courts term is unclear
But use some common sense -this is an attempt to sway = and the statute is saying no dice
Bookmarks