Members banned from this thread: ThatOwlWoman, Guno צְבִי and Doc Dutch


Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 73

Thread: Pelosi & DUI Hubby Cavort at Italian resort

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    The Democrats love investigations and one would certainly be merited if she used her political influence as Speaker to hide the arrest video.
    Last edited by Earl; 07-07-2022 at 06:28 AM.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,918
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    The Democrats love investigations and one would certainly be merited if she used her political influence as speaker to hide the arrest video.
    LOL

  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Along with an investigation of the Speaker (Not the Speaker after the Nov. elections) a thorough investigation of A/G Garland for not prosecuting the protestors at the homes of the S.C Justices which is a violation of federal law.

  4. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Federal law is quite clear. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1507, it is a criminal violation of federal law to picket or parade “near a building or residence occupied or used by [a federal] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.”

  5. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,825
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,985 Times in 3,359 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 635 Times in 603 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Is jail time mandatory for DUI in California?
    In California, jail time is practically mandatory for people convicted of a DUI. Even if it is your first offense and no one was injured, a judge can sentence you to six months in jail.
    You should really learn to read all the words in each sentence before you go and make a fool of yourself. What do you think the word "excessive" means?

    For a first-offense DUI in California, consequences for conviction generally include three years of informal probation, fines of $390 plus “penalty assessments” (totally approximately $2000, and completing a first offender alcohol program that consists of a 30-hour class, at a cost of about $500.

    There is no required jail time for a first offense when placed on probation. But it is possible to be sentenced to jail if certain aggravating factors are present, such as the presence of a minor child in the car or going 25 miles an hour or more over the speed limit on a roadway or 30 miles per hour on a freeway.
    https://www.superlawyers.com/ask/cal...ffef2045a.html

    But then I guess you have so much practice making yourself look like a fool you are now a pro so carry on.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  6. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,825
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,985 Times in 3,359 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 635 Times in 603 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Along with an investigation of the Speaker (Not the Speaker after the Nov. elections) a thorough investigation of A/G Garland for not prosecuting the protestors at the homes of the S.C Justices which is a violation of federal law.
    ROFLMAO.

    Once again you seem determined to prove yourself a fool. How do you think a judge can be influenced if someone is protesting a decision they already made?
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  7. The Following User Groans At Poor Richard Saunders For This Awful Post:

    Earl (07-07-2022)

  8. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    31,957
    Thanks
    4,429
    Thanked 14,956 Times in 10,497 Posts
    Groans
    550
    Groaned 573 Times in 557 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Life is Golden View Post
    https://nypost.com/2022/07/05/pelosi-dui-hubby-cavort-at-italian-resort-owned-by-andrea-bocelli/

    "Let them eat cake!"

    The Pelosis may want to skip the wine-tasting this time.

    A little more than a month after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, was busted for DUI in California — leaving him facing jail time — the multimillionaire couple was spotted at a ritzy resort on the Italian seaside owned by legendary tenor Andrea Bocelli.

    The Post exclusively obtained photos of the couple — Nancy dressed in all white with Paul clad in dark shorts and shirt — hanging with Bocelli, his wife, Veronica Berti, and others at the Alpemare Beach Club.





    Looks like her two bodyguards haven't missed any meals.

  9. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    ROFLMAO.

    Once again you seem determined to prove yourself a fool. How do you think a judge can be influenced if someone is protesting a decision they already made?
    They were protesting, in violation of federal law, BEFORE the final decision was made.

    Once again you seem determined to prove yourself a fool.

  10. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    You should really learn to read all the words in each sentence before you go and make a fool of yourself. What do you think the word "excessive" means?


    https://www.superlawyers.com/ask/cal...ffef2045a.html

    But then I guess you have so much practice making yourself look like a fool you are now a pro so carry on.
    The word, 'Excessive" does not appear in my post.

    You post a commercial from a lawyer group to make a point. Lol

    But then I guess you have so much practice making yourself look like a fool you are now a pro so carry on.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    Hermes Thoth (07-07-2022)

  12. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,918
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    They were protesting, in violation of federal law, BEFORE the final decision was made.

    Once again you seem determined to prove yourself a fool.
    LOL

  13. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,650
    Thanks
    6,590
    Thanked 12,126 Times in 9,657 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    Looks like a bunch of old milk cows....
    if you like powdered milk....

  14. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Supreme Court marshal asks state officials to act on protests ...
    https://www.npr.org › 2022/07/03 › protests-at-homes-of-...
    4 days ago — The protests have carried on for weeks since the leak of a draft of the court's eventual decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.


    This was BEFORE the final decision and was done to intimidate the S.C. Judges in their final decision...a federal crime that A/G Garland refused to prosecute.

    Garland will be impeached after the House turns red after Nov.

    Pobre-"How do you think a judge can be influenced if someone is protesting a decision they already made?"


    Pobre, you are pobre in more ways than one.
    Last edited by Earl; 07-07-2022 at 08:54 AM.

  15. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,825
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,985 Times in 3,359 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 635 Times in 603 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    They were protesting, in violation of federal law, BEFORE the final decision was made.

    Once again you seem determined to prove yourself a fool.
    Before the decision was released is not the same thing as before the decision was made. You have to prove that the protests were likely to change a judge's vote.
    Go ahead and present your evidence proving that was likely to happen and that you are likely to convince a jury of that. The requirement for federal prosecution is you have to be pretty sure you will get a conviction before you can indict.
    A little fact, Durham seems to have ignored.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  16. The Following User Groans At Poor Richard Saunders For This Awful Post:

    Earl (07-07-2022)

  17. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,290
    Thanks
    77,746
    Thanked 23,567 Times in 17,848 Posts
    Groans
    38,672
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    Before the decision was released is not the same thing as before the decision was made. You have to prove that the protests were likely to change a judge's vote.
    Go ahead and present your evidence proving that was likely to happen and that you are likely to convince a jury of that. The requirement for federal prosecution is you have to be pretty sure you will get a conviction before you can indict.
    A little fact, Durham seems to have ignored.
    No, no, no ,Pobre...read the law:

    Federal law is quite clear. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1507, it is a criminal violation of federal law to picket or parade “near a building or residence occupied or used by [a federal] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.”

    Do you see a time frame requirement? No, you do not.

    Shuck and jive, Pobre but you clearly lost this one.

    Pobre-"How do you think a judge can be influenced if someone is protesting a decision they already made?" The protests were to change the Justices' decision BEFORE the final decision.

    lol!
    Last edited by Earl; 07-07-2022 at 09:06 AM.

  18. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,825
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,985 Times in 3,359 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 635 Times in 603 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    The word, 'Excessive" does not appear in my post.

    You post a commercial from a lawyer group to make a point. Lol

    But then I guess you have so much practice making yourself look like a fool you are now a pro so carry on.
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    What can I expect after being arrested for a DUI in California?
    https://www.superlawyers.com › ... › California

    What is the penalty for drinking and driving in California?

    If you are convicted of DUI of either alcohol and/or drugs or both, and you have an excessive BAC level, you may be sentenced to serve up to 6 months in jail and pay a fine between $390–$1,000 the first time you are convicted. Your vehicle may be impounded and is subject to storage fees.

    Not so funny for the ancient Mr. Pelosi.
    The word "excessive" wasn't in your post? Now you are denying that you posted something when clearly you posted it?

    Funny thing is I used the same source you did, superlawyers.com, and now you want to complain about the source? Perhaps you should have bothered to read your source and understood what the word "excessive" means. You quoted the sentence that includes the word "excessive". You do like to prove you are a fool and continue to do so quite well.

    So to recap.
    You don't understand the meaning of the word "excessive".
    You deny you posted the word "excessive" when you clearly did.
    You used a source where you got the word "excessive" and posted it as if it was authoritative.
    When I use the same source and point out how it disputes your failure to understand the meaning of "excessive" you claim the source is not authoritative but only an ad for lawyers.

    You are certainly playing the fool quite well. Keep digging.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 06-03-2022, 08:22 PM
  2. Our friends the Dowkers and Whitmer's hubby.
    By Charoite in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-28-2020, 07:21 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-17-2018, 08:10 PM
  4. hubby paulin driving tips
    By Robdawg in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-02-2008, 10:30 AM
  5. Sandy O'Conners Hubby has a New Love
    By LadyT in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 11-14-2007, 10:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •