Secret Service agents confirm Hutchinson details

[BidenPresident]

Here's more for you to admit.


Keith Kellogg, the former national security adviser to Vice President Mike Pence, vouched for Mr. Ornato publicly, as did other former officials.

“I think the guy’s a straight shooter,” said John F. Kelly, the former White House chief of staff who has publicly broken with Mr. Trump, and who worked with Mr. Ornato when he was the special agent in charge of Mr. Trump’s detail. “There was never a second thought in my mind that, wherever we went, the work the Secret Service needed to do was done and done really well.”


https://www.nytimes.com



Secret Service confirmed to CBS News that Engel and the driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was physically attacked or assaulted by Trump and that the former president never lunged for the steering wheel of the vehicle. "


https://www.cbsnews.com

Good. Testify under oath. Quit whining.

[Frank Apisa]

And he disputes that account of their supposed conversation.

" Secret Service confirmed to CBS News that Engel and the driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was physically attacked or assaulted by Trump and that the former president never lunged for the steering wheel of the vehicle. "



/https://www.cbsnews.com/


Furthermore her testimony is indeed hearsay.


"Ornato didn’t witness the encounter himself, and he wasn’t under oath when he allegedly relayed the story to Hutchinson. This line of testimony would be considered inadmissible hearsay, if Hutchinson was testifying at trial and that testimony was being offered in support of the alleged fact of Trump trying to grab the steering wheel. Ornato didn’t witness the encounter himself, and he wasn’t under oath when he allegedly relayed the story to Hutchinson. "


https://lawandcrime.com/jan-6-commit...e-complicated/

Hutchinson's testimony that Ornato told her something was not hearsay. He did do it and she was a witness to what he told her. If they want to go under oath to say nothing happened, let them actually do it rather than say they are willing to do it.

[Frank Apisa]

but its hearsay regarding anything about trump.

THE TESTIMONY IS NOT HEARSAY.

It would never be entered in a trial...and you know that.

Stop with the bullshit.

[Sawyerloggingon]

Hutchinson's testimony that Ornato told her something was not hearsay. He did do it and she was a witness to what he told her. If they want to go under oath to say nothing happened, let them actually do it rather than say they are willing to do it.

They already testified under oath but the democrats show trial used hearsay testimony instead of there's. There's apparently didn't fit the narrative democrats are constructing. Now they offer to testify that Hutchinson lied but democrats will ignore that offer.

[Frank Apisa]

Here's more for you to admit.


Keith Kellogg, the former national security adviser to Vice President Mike Pence, vouched for Mr. Ornato publicly, as did other former officials.

“I think the guy’s a straight shooter,” said John F. Kelly, the former White House chief of staff who has publicly broken with Mr. Trump, and who worked with Mr. Ornato when he was the special agent in charge of Mr. Trump’s detail. “There was never a second thought in my mind that, wherever we went, the work the Secret Service needed to do was done and done really well.”


https://www.nytimes.com



Secret Service confirmed to CBS News that Engel and the driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was physically attacked or assaulted by Trump and that the former president never lunged for the steering wheel of the vehicle. "


https://www.cbsnews.com

If Ornato wants to go under oath before the committee and call Hutchinson a liar about her testimony...he should do so.

MY GUESS: It will NEVER, EVER happen. My guess is that what she said in her testimony is exactly what happened. (That Ornato told her what she said he told her.)

[Frank Apisa]

They already testified under oath but the democrats show trial used hearsay testimony instead of there's. There's apparently didn't fit the narrative democrats are constructing. Now they offer to testify that Hutchinson lied but democrats will ignore that offer.

You are so full of shit, I am surprised you can walk...if you can walk.

[Sawyerloggingon]

THE TESTIMONY IS NOT HEARSAY.

It would never be entered in a trial...and you know that.

Stop with the bullshit.

Fun to watch you keep undercutting your own claim that Hutchinson testimony wasn't hearsay. You've twisted yourself into a grotesque pretzel shape right in front of everyone. LMAO

[Sawyerloggingon]

You are so full of shit, I am surprised you can walk...if you can walk.

Like when Biden told a guy in a wheelchair to stand up?

[Sawyerloggingon]

If Ornato wants to go under oath before the committee and call Hutchinson a liar about her testimony...he should do so.

MY GUESS: It will NEVER, EVER happen. My guess is that what she said in her testimony is exactly what happened. (That Ornato told her what she said he told her.)

He can't testify under oath unless democrats call him as a witness so you're correct. He'll never testify before this committee on Hutchinson lying.

[Trumpet]

Like when Biden told a guy in a wheelchair to stand up?

Don't you have anything worthwhile to post, besides this frivolous nonsense?????????????

[Sawyerloggingon]

Don't you have anything worthwhile to post, besides this frivolous nonsense?????????????

Hit a nerve did I? LOL

[Frank Apisa]

Fun to watch you keep undercutting your own claim that Hutchinson testimony wasn't hearsay. You've twisted yourself into a grotesque pretzel shape right in front of everyone. LMAO

I have been consistent throughout this "conversation."

YOU are the one doing the twisting.

But it is obvious you cannot see it.

So...continue in your delusions.

[Trumpet]

Hit a nerve did I? LOL

Are you for real????????????

[Frank Apisa]

Like when Biden told a guy in a wheelchair to stand up?

You are so full of shit, it is amazing you can walk...if you can walk.

[Sawyerloggingon]

I have been consistent throughout this "conversation."

YOU are the one doing the twisting.

But it is obvious you cannot see it.

So...continue in your delusions.

Yes you've been consistent in undercutting your own position that Hutchinson testimony wasn't hearsay. Funny stuff!