Kagan warns parts of East Coast 'swallowed by the ocean' in dissent in EPA case

[PostmodernProphet]

Notice her dissent had absolutely nothing to do with actual law.

to her, the law is defined as what she can get away with......

[PostmodernProphet]

This Court’s ruling on nearly everything is totally predictable

you say that like its a bad thing.......

[archives]

Libs are prone to use "living document" and just allow the Constituion to fit their needs.

SCOTUS didn't rule on Co2. It ruled Congress did not give the Clean Air Act the power to regulate such

We’ve been thru this before, but strict constructionism is a myth, “Originalism” is a hoax, even Jefferson, the champion of such had to admit such when he purchased Louisiana and witnessed the Reign of Terror, in fact, he thought it should be rewritten every twenty years

And what makes even a bigger joke is the majority decisions authored by Alito and Thomas are so sophomoric and bad the intent is obvious regardless of how they try to rationalize it

[anatta]

We’ve been thru this before, but strict constructionism is a myth, “Originalism” is a hoax, even Jefferson, the champion of such had to admit such when he purchased Louisiana and witnessed the Reign of Terror, in fact, he thought it should be rewritten every twenty years

And what makes even a bigger joke is the majority decisions authored by Alito and Thomas are so sophomoric and bad the intent is obvious regardless of how they try to rationalize it

Jefferson was an outlier ( if he was talking about the Constitution) no other founder ever said anything like that

They are not sophomoric, they are written directly towards the Constitutionality of the cases
Kagan goes off on what is a global alarming rant, and then justified regulating Co2 as a "pollutant"
The Clean Air act doesn't allow such - CO2/ Ozone is not the same as particulate air pollution
which was the purpose of the Act.

If you want those regulated -the Congress has to update the Clean Air act's authority
which is the heart of the decision even beyond the Clean Air Act
(all bureaucratic regs have to have Congressional intent- not created by bureaucrats)

[BidenPresident]

FOX=Fake News

[Stone]

You kidding, without the Northeast, and West Coast, the U.S. would soon evolve to resemble Albania

Nope. Not even close.

[Grokmaster]

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics...9dca834ce46a98
Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to ‘the most pressing environmental challenge of our time,'" Kagan wrote.

SUPREME COURT DEALS BIDEN CLIMATE AGENDA SERIOUS BLOW WITH EPA DECISION

Kagan said the dangers of rising temperatures and, as a result, devastating environmental effects, including, "Rising waters, scorching heat, and other severe weather conditions [that] could force ‘mass migration events[,] political crises, civil unrest,’ and even state failure.'"

Kagan elaborated that the Earth was "now warmer than any time" in modern history, highlighting the importance of scientific research on carbon dioxide contributing to global warming. She also wrote global warming could be the cause of "4.6 million excess yearly deaths."

She added that the EPA's authority in curbing greenhouse emissions did fall into the parameters set by Congress.

"Section 111 of the Clean Air Act directs EPA to regulate stationary sources of any substance that ‘causes, or contributes significantly to, air pollution’ and that ‘may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,’" she wrote.

Kagan wrote carbon dioxide and other such greenhouse gases did, in fact, categorize as such per the description.

The HIGH-WATER mark on my dock post near Clearwater (FL.) is exactly where it was 30 years ago.

[archives]

Jefferson was an outlier ( if he was talking about the Constitution) no other founder ever said anything like that

They are not sophomoric, they are written directly towards the Constitutionality of the cases
Kagan goes off on what is a global alarming rant, and then justified regulating Co2 as a "pollutant"
The Clean Air act doesn't allow such - CO2/ Ozone is not the same as particulate air pollution
which was the purpose of the Act.

If you want those regulated -the Congress has to update the Clean Air act's authority
which is the heart of the decision even beyond the Clean Air Act
(all bureaucratic regs have to have Congressional intent- not created by bureaucrats)

Wasn’t an “outlander,” in fact, as I mentioned, he was the most dogmatic strict constructionist. Madison agrees with him, and it was Hamilton’s position from the jump, probably Washington also since he authorized Hamilton’s bank.

Wrong, they are written on what they want you to believe is in the Constitution, what the supposedly the Founders intended by putting it in the the Constitution, and they have been incorrect in nearly every case.

[T. A. Gardner]

Notice her dissent had absolutely nothing to do with actual law.

Well, that's normal for a Leftist.

[archives]

Nope. Not even close.

Sure it is, there is a reason it has been referred to as fly over country ever since planes flew long distances

[BidenPresident]

Everyone who watches FOX is an uninformed moron.

[archives]

Well, that's normal for a Leftist.

Does the majority opinion

[T. A. Gardner]

Does the majority opinion

Does the majority opinion, what?

[archives]

The HIGH-WATER mark on my dock post near Clearwater (FL.) is exactly where it was 30 years ago.

Scientology just keep raising the dock

[archives]

Does the majority opinion, what?

Have anything to “do with actual law”