Frank Apisa (06-29-2022), gemini104104 (06-29-2022), Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022), martin (06-29-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)
Cassidy Hutchinson advances the 1/6 committee’s theory of the case
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022...e-charged.html
On Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson provided some of the most damning public testimony yet in the public hearings by the House committee investigating January 6. Speaking clearly, deliberately, and thoughtfully, the former aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided a riveting and legitimately disturbing account of Donald Trump’s conduct before and during the attack on the Capitol. She appeared to provide the facts as she knew them, without needless speculation. And she seemed to take pains to specify precisely what she knew, how she knew it, and, as importantly, what she did not know. On its face, it was about as credible a performance as any witness can provide.
Hutchinson’s testimony also added distinct pieces of evidentiary support for what committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney described during the first public hearing in June as a “sophisticated seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transition of presidential power.” The committee’s members have made no secret of the fact that they believe that these are appropriate lines of inquiry for a criminal investigation that they would like to see the Justice Department undertake (assuming that it is not already doing so) and that Trump’s conduct could warrant criminal charges. Hutchinson’s testimony in particular advanced the theory that Trump intended for the violence at the Capitol to occur.
Republican Congressman Ken Buck:
“We’re at a time in American politics, that I am not going to lie on behalf of my presidential candidate, on behalf of my party. And I’m very sad that others in my party have taken the position that, as long as we get the White House, it doesn’t really matter what we say,”
Frank Apisa (06-29-2022), gemini104104 (06-29-2022), Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022), martin (06-29-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)
Hutchinson gave first hand details that showed what we already knew. Trump encouraged the violence. Seditious conspiracy.
Hutchinson has been proven to be a liar. We can't trust anything she says.
IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
Biden/Harris 2024
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
cancel2 2022 (06-29-2022), Into the Night (06-29-2022)
Another lie like the "Muh Russia" hoax, a waste of time and money compliments of the TDS deranged loons.
anonymoose (06-29-2022), dukkha (06-29-2022), Into the Night (06-29-2022)
cancel2 2022 (06-29-2022)
Guno צְבִי (07-03-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)
if DoJ indicts on this crap -a Committee that doesn't allow the other party to appoint members-
who would question and not produce a narrative, it would be a typical Garland move
cancel2 2022 (06-29-2022)
Into the Night (06-29-2022)
Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)
Well, the Democrats have five months to do something, after that they're DIW.
McRocket (06-29-2022)
Why the fuck should anyone (outside of obsessed lefties) give a crap about this if the FBI won't charge Trump with anything in this regard?
And it has been over 500 days and still no charges.
Are you people seriously suggesting that the FBI did not investigate January 6, to see if Trump should be charged with anything?
This is looking more and more - to me - that the Dems are desperate to take everyone's mind off the economy.
So they are holding these hearings to try and do exactly that.
Once again - I HATE both parties.
Fucking despise them.
Into the Night (06-29-2022)
What kind of country have we become?
One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”
and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?
Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022)
Bookmarks