Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 88

Thread: The Odds Are Increasing That Trump Gets Charged

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    15,885
    Thanks
    6,794
    Thanked 9,174 Times in 5,911 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 594 Times in 558 Posts

    Default The Odds Are Increasing That Trump Gets Charged

    Cassidy Hutchinson advances the 1/6 committee’s theory of the case

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022...e-charged.html

    On Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson provided some of the most damning public testimony yet in the public hearings by the House committee investigating January 6. Speaking clearly, deliberately, and thoughtfully, the former aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided a riveting and legitimately disturbing account of Donald Trump’s conduct before and during the attack on the Capitol. She appeared to provide the facts as she knew them, without needless speculation. And she seemed to take pains to specify precisely what she knew, how she knew it, and, as importantly, what she did not know. On its face, it was about as credible a performance as any witness can provide.

    Hutchinson’s testimony also added distinct pieces of evidentiary support for what committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney described during the first public hearing in June as a “sophisticated seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transition of presidential power.” The committee’s members have made no secret of the fact that they believe that these are appropriate lines of inquiry for a criminal investigation that they would like to see the Justice Department undertake (assuming that it is not already doing so) and that Trump’s conduct could warrant criminal charges. Hutchinson’s testimony in particular advanced the theory that Trump intended for the violence at the Capitol to occur.

    Republican Congressman Ken Buck:
    “We’re at a time in American politics, that I am not going to lie on behalf of my presidential candidate, on behalf of my party. And I’m very sad that others in my party have taken the position that, as long as we get the White House, it doesn’t really matter what we say,”



  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Joe Capitalist For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (06-29-2022), gemini104104 (06-29-2022), Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022), martin (06-29-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Hutchinson gave first hand details that showed what we already knew. Trump encouraged the violence. Seditious conspiracy.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,799
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 19,969 Times in 14,556 Posts
    Groans
    1,422
    Groaned 949 Times in 933 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Hutchinson has been proven to be a liar. We can't trust anything she says.
    IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
    Biden/Harris 2024
    IT'S A NO BRAINER!


  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExpressLane For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (06-29-2022), Into the Night (06-29-2022)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    Hutchinson has been proven to be a liar. We can't trust anything she says.
    What lie did you prove of Hutchinson?

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Where Woke Goes to Die
    Posts
    14,127
    Thanks
    10,362
    Thanked 8,959 Times in 6,246 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 483 Times in 453 Posts

    Default

    Another lie like the "Muh Russia" hoax, a waste of time and money compliments of the TDS deranged loons.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Life is Golden For This Post:

    anonymoose (06-29-2022), dukkha (06-29-2022), Into the Night (06-29-2022)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,771 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    Hutchinson has been proven to be a liar. We can't trust anything she says.

  10. The Following User Groans At Phantasmal For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (06-29-2022)

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (07-03-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    if DoJ indicts on this crap -a Committee that doesn't allow the other party to appoint members-
    who would question and not produce a narrative, it would be a typical Garland move

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (06-29-2022)

  14. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    if DoJ indicts on this crap -a Committee that doesn't allow the other party to appoint members-
    who would question and not produce a narrative, it would be a typical Garland move
    Evidence is evidence, you brain dead troll.

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    31,957
    Thanks
    4,430
    Thanked 14,957 Times in 10,497 Posts
    Groans
    550
    Groaned 573 Times in 557 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Capitalist View Post
    Cassidy Hutchinson advances the 1/6 committee’s theory of the case

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022...e-charged.html

    On Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson provided some of the most damning public testimony yet in the public hearings by the House committee investigating January 6. Speaking clearly, deliberately, and thoughtfully, the former aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided a riveting and legitimately disturbing account of Donald Trump’s conduct before and during the attack on the Capitol. She appeared to provide the facts as she knew them, without needless speculation. And she seemed to take pains to specify precisely what she knew, how she knew it, and, as importantly, what she did not know. On its face, it was about as credible a performance as any witness can provide.

    Hutchinson’s testimony also added distinct pieces of evidentiary support for what committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney described during the first public hearing in June as a “sophisticated seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transition of presidential power.” The committee’s members have made no secret of the fact that they believe that these are appropriate lines of inquiry for a criminal investigation that they would like to see the Justice Department undertake (assuming that it is not already doing so) and that Trump’s conduct could warrant criminal charges. Hutchinson’s testimony in particular advanced the theory that Trump intended for the violence at the Capitol to occur.

    Weren't you promising that four years ago? Then three years ago? Then two years ago?


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Lionfish For This Post:

    Into the Night (06-29-2022)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    if DoJ indicts on this crap -a Committee that doesn't allow the other party to appoint members-
    who would question and not produce a narrative, it would be a typical Garland move
    There are thousands go pages of testimony with much more to follow, but its indicating that Trump wanted his followers to be armed and attacking the capital.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022), ThatOwlWoman (06-29-2022)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,079
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,929 Times in 13,196 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Well, the Democrats have five months to do something, after that they're DIW.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    McRocket (06-29-2022)

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    4,051
    Thanks
    2,109
    Thanked 1,113 Times in 890 Posts
    Groans
    117
    Groaned 144 Times in 135 Posts

    Default

    Why the fuck should anyone (outside of obsessed lefties) give a crap about this if the FBI won't charge Trump with anything in this regard?
    And it has been over 500 days and still no charges.
    Are you people seriously suggesting that the FBI did not investigate January 6, to see if Trump should be charged with anything?


    This is looking more and more - to me - that the Dems are desperate to take everyone's mind off the economy.
    So they are holding these hearings to try and do exactly that.



    Once again - I HATE both parties.
    Fucking despise them.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to McRocket For This Post:

    Into the Night (06-29-2022)

  23. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    33,934
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,544 Times in 9,995 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,099 Times in 1,011 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    What lie did you prove of Hutchinson?
    what statement from her has been proven?

    Is hear say proven facts?

  24. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    if DoJ indicts on this crap -a Committee that doesn't allow the other party to appoint members-
    who would question and not produce a narrative, it would be a typical Garland move
    The other party yanked their committee members when Kevin McCarthy got his feewings hurt.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to ZappasGuitar For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (06-29-2022)

  26. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    what statement from her has been proven?

    Is hear say proven facts?
    you are stupid and worthless

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-11-2019, 02:28 PM
  2. Trump's lies are increasing at an alarming rate—now at TWENTY per day
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-13-2019, 07:53 AM
  3. Trump fueling job growth and increasing revenues
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-12-2019, 12:06 PM
  4. APP - Wages increasing thanks to Trump
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-06-2017, 04:13 PM
  5. Current Election odds and MLB odds comparison
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-31-2016, 01:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •