The Odds Are Increasing That Trump Gets Charged

[Joe Capitalist]

Cassidy Hutchinson advances the 1/6 committee’s theory of the case

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022...e-charged.html

On Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson provided some of the most damning public testimony yet in the public hearings by the House committee investigating January 6. Speaking clearly, deliberately, and thoughtfully, the former aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided a riveting and legitimately disturbing account of Donald Trump’s conduct before and during the attack on the Capitol. She appeared to provide the facts as she knew them, without needless speculation. And she seemed to take pains to specify precisely what she knew, how she knew it, and, as importantly, what she did not know. On its face, it was about as credible a performance as any witness can provide.

Hutchinson’s testimony also added distinct pieces of evidentiary support for what committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney described during the first public hearing in June as a “sophisticated seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transition of presidential power.” The committee’s members have made no secret of the fact that they believe that these are appropriate lines of inquiry for a criminal investigation that they would like to see the Justice Department undertake (assuming that it is not already doing so) and that Trump’s conduct could warrant criminal charges. Hutchinson’s testimony in particular advanced the theory that Trump intended for the violence at the Capitol to occur.

[BidenPresident]

Hutchinson gave first hand details that showed what we already knew. Trump encouraged the violence. Seditious conspiracy.

[Into the Night]

Hutchinson gave first hand details that showed what we already knew. Trump encouraged the violence. Seditious conspiracy.

Trump is not a Democrat. He does not support Antifa nor BLM. The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

[Shoresy]

Hutchinson gave first hand details that showed what we already knew. Trump encouraged the violence. Seditious conspiracy.

No she gave hearsay testimony which turned out to be overt perjury as Tony Ornato said he never told her the story.

[PostmodernProphet]

Hutchinson gave first hand details that showed what we already knew. Trump encouraged the violence. Seditious conspiracy.

obviously it wasn't first hand......she wasn't in the limo.........idiot......

[ExpressLane]

Hutchinson has been proven to be a liar. We can't trust anything she says.

[BidenPresident]

Hutchinson has been proven to be a liar. We can't trust anything she says.

What lie did you prove of Hutchinson?

[volsrock]

What lie did you prove of Hutchinson?

what statement from her has been proven?

Is hear say proven facts?

[BidenPresident]

what statement from her has been proven?

Is hear say proven facts?

you are stupid and worthless

[anonymoose]

If he gets charged it’ll be another win for Trump after he’s found not guilty which will make him stronger. The odds of him getting convicted of anything are almost infinitesimally low.
Dims should be careful what they ask for. They just might get it (to their detriment).

[Grokmaster]

[zappasguitar]

what statement from her has been proven?

Is hear say proven facts?

She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

[BidenPresident]

She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

Absolutely! Look at all the cowards bashing this brave woman.

[volsrock]

She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

Secret Service officials: Agents willing to dispute Trump SUV incident under oath


Officials from the US Secret Service have announced that Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel, the agents named in Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, are willing to testify before the Jan. 6 committee and dispute Hutchinson's account of an alleged incident involving then-President Trump.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...ing-nr-vpx.cnn

[Into the Night]

She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

Hutchinson's claims are physically not possible. She's making it up. That's perjury right there. Oh...the Secret Service IS willing to file an affidavit (testimony under oath).