WHOOPS SHE LIED

[Truth Detector]

They lie, he did not say it, quick search proves it.

https://news.yahoo.com/secret-agent-...ycsrp_catchall

https://news.yahoo.com/secret-agents...ycsrp_catchall

https://www.dailywire.com/news/break...car-with-trump

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sec...l-capitol-riot

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...mp-wheel-jan-6

[LV426]

I have not said anything at all to that effect. I said: If the person who was there actually was willing to say what they want him to say he would be "testifying" and it wouldn't be an overheard conversation with a bit that said: "and they said something to the effect of..." in it.

If you get one of the SS agents that this happened to to tell us about it, then you have some testimony. Not of a criminal conspiracy, but you have testimony that isn't hearsay and inadmissible in any court.

Whether or not Trump tried to take the wheel of the Beast doesn't change the fact that he tried to pull off a coup.

[Truth Detector]

Also, there is no evidence at all he contradicted the story, that is just made up Trumpper shit.

https://news.yahoo.com/secret-agent-...ycsrp_catchall

https://news.yahoo.com/secret-agents...ycsrp_catchall

https://www.dailywire.com/news/break...car-with-trump

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sec...l-capitol-riot

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...mp-wheel-jan-6

[Jarod]

1. It really doesn't. There just is no reason to make an affidavit that something didn't happen. It's silly to pretend that it would make a difference to you.
2. Nah, it just underlines the nature of the "witness". Her "testimony" was rife with absurd nonsense. The reason "the right" focused on this was because the left was using them in the news as examples, they are simply using the examples they saw in the news.
3. I don't believe she provided anything, she undermined her own credibility, gossiped, and then got a pat on the back, the points that were "outrageous" and used in the news as examples are the ones we are talking about here. Get Maddow to talk about something with more meat in it and maybe you'd have a point.
4. However it was brought to us with that description. She was their "blockbuster witness", and she was not very credible.

The reason would be to discredit what she said and to offer his side.

What undermines the nature of the Witness? She offered lots of evidence, yet this piece of trivia is all they want to refute.

I could care less what Maddow talks about, I do not watch and its not relevant to the work the Bi-partisin Committee is doing.

Who called her blockbuster? Maddow?

[LV426]

They lie, he did not say it, quick search proves it.

All Conservatives do is lie.

[LV426]

Also, there is no evidence at all he contradicted the story, that is just made up Trumpper shit.

Exactly.

Hutchinson's testimony was damaging to Trump, which is why all his allies and fellow Nazis are trying to discredit her entire testimony by discrediting the one part of it that had virtually nothing to do with the coup attempt.

[Truth Detector]

You are extremely stupid.

You misspelled "I am" dipshit. You claiming anyone else as being stupid is the definition of irony and projection.

[Truth Detector]

He has not discredited the story. Its unrefuted, what Hutchensen said.

It has been refuted you lying moron.

[Truth Detector]

Whether or not Trump tried to take the wheel of the Beast doesn't change the fact that he tried to pull off a coup.

There was no coup. There was no insurrection. Those are buffoonish DNC narratives that only uneducated, low IQ mental cases like you parrot.

[LV426]

This ^Is why you cannot debate a dishonest, low IQ mental case on steroids.

You didn't answer the question!

This is an OUTRAGE for BOTH sides. How is it that elections we have had in the past were counted by midnight now are taking days and days to count?

As Trump stated; VOTE-BY-MAIL is a disaster and ONLY a benefit to the Party of CHAOS (Jackass).

So by midnight, Trump had OVER a 500,000 vote lead. Yet it was not enough to call the state for Trump? Two days later that lead has been reduced to 135,000. So are ALL the votes these incompetent boobs in PA can't seem to count on election night for Biden? How is that even remotely possible???

Same with Georgia. Isn't it fascinating that on election night Trump had an 85,000 vote margin. Today, three days later it has shrunk to a mere 13,500 vote margin.

This is an OUTRAGE and a total embarrassment for America. The Party of CHAOS (jackass) planned it this way so that they could find a way to STEAL this election.

How is it that Democratic members of the State claimed that they were sure that by the end of the counting Biden would win when Trump had a 500,000 vote margin??

I think we all KNOW the honest answer to that question.

How was the election "corrupted" and to what end was it "corrupted"?

You seem to be saying right here in the red it was corrupted so that Democrats could "steal the election".

[Truth Detector]

All Conservatives do is lie.

PROJECTION!

[LV426]

This is an OUTRAGE for BOTH sides. How is it that elections we have had in the past were counted by midnight now are taking days and days to count?

As Trump stated; VOTE-BY-MAIL is a disaster and ONLY a benefit to the Party of CHAOS (Jackass).

So by midnight, Trump had OVER a 500,000 vote lead. Yet it was not enough to call the state for Trump? Two days later that lead has been reduced to 135,000. So are ALL the votes these incompetent boobs in PA can't seem to count on election night for Biden? How is that even remotely possible???

Same with Georgia. Isn't it fascinating that on election night Trump had an 85,000 vote margin. Today, three days later it has shrunk to a mere 13,500 vote margin.

This is an OUTRAGE and a total embarrassment for America. The Party of CHAOS (jackass) planned it this way so that they could find a way to STEAL this election.

How is it that Democratic members of the State claimed that they were sure that by the end of the counting Biden would win when Trump had a 500,000 vote margin??

I think we all KNOW the honest answer to that question.

Two simple questions:

1. How was the election corrupted?

2. To what end was it corrupted?

[Truth Detector]

Exactly.

Hutchinson's testimony was damaging to Trump, which is why all his allies and fellow Nazis are trying to discredit her entire testimony by discrediting the one part of it that had virtually nothing to do with the coup attempt.

It wasn't testimony. It was a gross fabrication. But alas, you're an uneducated, dishonest, lying mental case on steroids.

[Truth Detector]

You didn't answer the question!
How was the election "corrupted" and to what end was it "corrupted"?
You seem to be saying right here in the red it was corrupted so that Democrats could "steal the election".

When someone trolls their own thread, they have lost the argument. Now run along you delusional mental case.

[Jarod]

Exactly.

Hutchinson's testimony was damaging to Trump, which is why all his allies and fellow Nazis are trying to discredit her entire testimony by discrediting the one part of it that had virtually nothing to do with the coup attempt.

I tend to agree, but the intelligent consumer has to ask, why are they attacking her on the most insignificant part of her testimony?


Her testimony is not refuted by anyone thus far.