Page 37 of 41 FirstFirst ... 27333435363738394041 LastLast
Results 541 to 555 of 606

Thread: WHOOPS SHE LIED

  1. #541 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,859
    Thanks
    13,250
    Thanked 40,795 Times in 32,158 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    So, how many people have you trashed and discredited to protect Trump at this point? Any count?
    about a dozen idiotic JPP lib'ruls.......but they were easy targets......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (07-06-2022)

  3. #542 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    63,304
    Thanks
    6,234
    Thanked 13,410 Times in 10,039 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,947 Times in 2,728 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    and yet, if offered to show the truth of what the conversation relayed, it is hearsay and not admissible.......she would in fact be allowed to say she had a conversation with the valet.......but not what the conversation was about......sorry you have a fucked up understanding of hearsay, but such is life......
    You're a BIG FUCKING IDIOT for thinking that anything Hutchinson says is contradicted by the Secret Service since that fake controversy was triggered by a Nazi on twitter crediting "a source close to the Secret Service saying the agent will testify."

    That was also two weeks ago, so why the fuck hasn't this guy testified under oath and in public to the 1/6 commission?

    Are we awaiting his testimony just like we're awaiting the investigation into who leaked the Dobbs draft???
    When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist


  4. #543 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,859
    Thanks
    13,250
    Thanked 40,795 Times in 32,158 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    So, it turns out that she didn't lie.

    How 'bout that?
    how about a link?.....
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (07-06-2022)

  6. #544 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    85,117
    Thanks
    2,507
    Thanked 16,531 Times in 10,535 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 578 Times in 535 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
    You are all being taken for suckers by Nazis who credit an unnamed source with saying that this agent is willing to testify.

    THAT is hearsay.
    I have not said anything at all to that effect. I said: If the person who was there actually was willing to say what they want him to say he would be "testifying" and it wouldn't be an overheard conversation with a bit that said: "and they said something to the effect of..." in it.

    If you get one of the SS agents that this happened to to tell us about it, then you have some testimony. Not of a criminal conspiracy, but you have testimony that isn't hearsay and inadmissible in any court.
    Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
    - -- Aristotle

    Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
    - -- The Buddha

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    - -- Aristotle

  7. #545 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,672
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Damocles View Post
    Well, first this "panel" would never accept it, it is a partisan hacktackular television show with handpicked reliable folks from the "other party" so they can pretend they are "bipartisan"... this is in no way a court hearing with cross questioning.

    but the reality is, when all you have against him is a witness talking about what she overheard during a conversation... nobody needs to do that. Only the 30% who think Brandon is doing a good job will ever care.

    Believe me. I wish you guys would do better at this. I don't want Trump to run again. I certainly don't want him to win again. I do not like him.

    The only thing I have to say is that if this is their "blockbuster" witness, you all have nothing at all and you know it, whether you are willing to admit it here or not. You had to feel it in the pit of your stomach each and every time this gossip said, "And they said something to the effect of"... during her "testimony".
    1) Who cares if the panel would accept it? Why would that matter? I said deliver it to the networks, not the panel.
    2) I do not care if he lunged for the wheel or not, that it really beside the point of the story, an amusing footnote. It's interesting that is the part the Right has chosen to dispute.
    3) I thought she provided some crucial stuff, but that hearsay part about the limo was not it.
    4) I do not think there is a single blockbuster witness in most real life investigations, usually its the cumulation of several witnesses. I suspect the bi-partisin committee is presenting the entire story.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    christiefan915 (07-06-2022)

  9. #546 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,672
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
    Because the truth is that he never said this, Nazis made up a source and then credited that source with this wild claim about a Secret Service agent willing to testify.

    The agent himself hasn't said SHIT.
    They lie, he did not say it, quick search proves it.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  10. #547 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,672
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Well why doesn't some Republican Trumpper sycophant respond by presenting this guy with an affidavit to sign, and then send it to the networks?
    Hell he could write one up one himself and get it notarized?

    One does not have to be called by a congressional committee to offer sworn testimony on a subject.
    Also, there is no evidence at all he contradicted the story, that is just made up Trumpper shit.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  11. #548 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,336 Times in 22,665 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
    "Corrupted" how, and to what end?

    Why was it corrupted? So that it could produce an outcome different from the one you anticipated? And wouldn't that outcome then be a stolen election?

    You're terrible with using rhetoric.
    This ^Is why you cannot debate a dishonest, low IQ mental case on steroids.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  12. #549 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,859
    Thanks
    13,250
    Thanked 40,795 Times in 32,158 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Well why doesn't some Republican Trumpper sycophant respond by presenting this guy with an affidavit to sign, and then send it to the networks?
    if the 1/6 committee wants to regain credibility they will call him........if they want to pretend they didn't really call Hutchinson and sweep it under the rug they won't........it's THEIR responsibility......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (07-06-2022)

  14. #550 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,859
    Thanks
    13,250
    Thanked 40,795 Times in 32,158 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Only to scumbags like you.
    she only had credibility with scumbags in the first place......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (07-06-2022)

  16. #551 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    85,117
    Thanks
    2,507
    Thanked 16,531 Times in 10,535 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 578 Times in 535 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    1) Who cares if the panel would accept it? Why would that matter? I said deliver it to the networks, not the panel.
    2) I do not care if he lunged for the wheel or not, that it really beside the point of the story, an amusing footnote. It's interesting that is the part the Right has chosen to dispute.
    3) I thought she provided some crucial stuff, but that hearsay part about the limo was not it.
    4) I do not think there is a single blockbuster witness in most real life investigations, usually its the cumulation of several witnesses. I suspect the bi-partisin committee is presenting the entire story.
    1. It really doesn't. There just is no reason to make an affidavit that something didn't happen. It's silly to pretend that it would make a difference to you.
    2. Nah, it just underlines the nature of the "witness". Her "testimony" was rife with absurd nonsense. The reason "the right" focused on this was because the left was using them in the news as examples, they are simply using the examples they saw in the news.
    3. I don't believe she provided anything, she undermined her own credibility, gossiped, and then got a pat on the back, the points that were "outrageous" and used in the news as examples are the ones we are talking about here. Get Maddow to talk about something with more meat in it and maybe you'd have a point.
    4. However it was brought to us with that description. She was their "blockbuster witness", and she was not very credible.
    Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
    - -- Aristotle

    Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
    - -- The Buddha

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    - -- Aristotle

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Damocles For This Post:

    Truth Detector (07-06-2022)

  18. #552 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    she only had credibility with scumbags in the first place......
    You are extremely stupid.

  19. #553 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,336 Times in 22,665 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    1) Who cares if the panel would accept it? Why would that matter? I said deliver it to the networks, not the panel.
    2) I do not care if he lunged for the wheel or not, that it really beside the point of the story, an amusing footnote. It's interesting that is the part the Right has chosen to dispute.
    3) I thought she provided some crucial stuff, but that hearsay part about the limo was not it.
    4) I do not think there is a single blockbuster witness in most real life investigations, usually its the cumulation of several witnesses. I suspect the bi-partisin committee is presenting the entire story.
    It is a clown show with nothing more than hearsay as its evidence. It is not bi-partisan. It is partisan. There is no cross examination or contrary witnesses.

    It is a clown show intended for fools who will gulp down their bullshit and parrot it. There was no crime. There will be no charges. If there are, they will end in a debacle like the Mueller clown show and precious two clown show impeachments.

    Democrats are continuing to remove any doubt how mentally disturbed and stupid they are. It will be a BIG boost in November for the RED tsunami coming.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  20. #554 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,672
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    if the 1/6 committee wants to regain credibility they will call him........if they want to pretend they didn't really call Hutchinson and sweep it under the rug they won't........it's THEIR responsibility......
    He has not discredited the story. Its unrefuted, what Hutchensen said.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  21. #555 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    63,304
    Thanks
    6,234
    Thanked 13,410 Times in 10,039 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,947 Times in 2,728 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Damocles View Post
    I have not said anything at all to that effect.
    You haven't used those exact words, but the intention is crystal clear.

    The only reason you are disingenuously pretending that she's not credible is because you simply cannot fathom what happened on 1/6 and that the people you've been running cover for on JPP and indulging were responsible for it.

    You are doing this because you are trying to discredit her entire testimony by discrediting this one part...but the facts are that Hutchinson would not have testified publicly to any of this shit if it wasn't already corroborated by the investigations, trials, depositions, interviews, and recordings.

    Meanwhile, you all have been taken by an unnamed source from a Nazi on twitter...desperate to find anything to discredit Hutchinson, you chose to focus on the part of her testimony that had the least to do with the coup.

    So the only reason you'd seek to do that is because you either have consciousness of guilt (which you should have anyway for indulging Nazis on the internet), or you simply don't want to admit that your personal judgment and instincts SUCK.


    If you get one of the SS agents that this happened to to tell us about it, then you have some testimony.
    What makes you think the 1/6 Commission doesn't already have SS testimony, and why would the 1/6 commission have her testify publicly, if everything she's testifying to isn't already corroborated by the work the commission is doing?

    Also, all this because a Nazi on twitter credited an unnamed source close to the Secret Service that particular agent was willing to testify...that agent hasn't said SHIT, and until he does -under oath- Hutchinson's version of events stand as the only truthful one thus far.


    Not of a criminal conspiracy, but you have testimony that isn't hearsay and inadmissible in any court.
    That's the DOJ's problem to figure out.

    The 1/6 commission is merely getting to the bottom of what your Nazi pals did from 2020 through 1/6.
    When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist


Similar Threads

  1. The media lied about duant wright even worse than they lied about george floyd
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-26-2021, 12:32 PM
  2. Well the just a misdemeanor was a lie..WHOOPS a BIG WHOOPS
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-13-2021, 10:51 PM
  3. Everyone knows Cohen lied, he lied to cover Trump's fat ass
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-27-2019, 10:06 PM
  4. Bush lied us into iraq. Obama lied us into obamacare. But moon landings are true?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-13-2018, 01:46 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-22-2017, 02:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •