Truth Detector (07-06-2022)
Truth Detector (07-06-2022)
You're a BIG FUCKING IDIOT for thinking that anything Hutchinson says is contradicted by the Secret Service since that fake controversy was triggered by a Nazi on twitter crediting "a source close to the Secret Service saying the agent will testify."
That was also two weeks ago, so why the fuck hasn't this guy testified under oath and in public to the 1/6 commission?
Are we awaiting his testimony just like we're awaiting the investigation into who leaked the Dobbs draft???
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Truth Detector (07-06-2022)
I have not said anything at all to that effect. I said: If the person who was there actually was willing to say what they want him to say he would be "testifying" and it wouldn't be an overheard conversation with a bit that said: "and they said something to the effect of..." in it.
If you get one of the SS agents that this happened to to tell us about it, then you have some testimony. Not of a criminal conspiracy, but you have testimony that isn't hearsay and inadmissible in any court.
Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
- -- Aristotle
Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
- -- The Buddha
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- -- Aristotle
1) Who cares if the panel would accept it? Why would that matter? I said deliver it to the networks, not the panel.
2) I do not care if he lunged for the wheel or not, that it really beside the point of the story, an amusing footnote. It's interesting that is the part the Right has chosen to dispute.
3) I thought she provided some crucial stuff, but that hearsay part about the limo was not it.
4) I do not think there is a single blockbuster witness in most real life investigations, usually its the cumulation of several witnesses. I suspect the bi-partisin committee is presenting the entire story.
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
christiefan915 (07-06-2022)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Truth Detector (07-06-2022)
Truth Detector (07-06-2022)
1. It really doesn't. There just is no reason to make an affidavit that something didn't happen. It's silly to pretend that it would make a difference to you.
2. Nah, it just underlines the nature of the "witness". Her "testimony" was rife with absurd nonsense. The reason "the right" focused on this was because the left was using them in the news as examples, they are simply using the examples they saw in the news.
3. I don't believe she provided anything, she undermined her own credibility, gossiped, and then got a pat on the back, the points that were "outrageous" and used in the news as examples are the ones we are talking about here. Get Maddow to talk about something with more meat in it and maybe you'd have a point.
4. However it was brought to us with that description. She was their "blockbuster witness", and she was not very credible.
Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
- -- Aristotle
Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
- -- The Buddha
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- -- Aristotle
Truth Detector (07-06-2022)
It is a clown show with nothing more than hearsay as its evidence. It is not bi-partisan. It is partisan. There is no cross examination or contrary witnesses.
It is a clown show intended for fools who will gulp down their bullshit and parrot it. There was no crime. There will be no charges. If there are, they will end in a debacle like the Mueller clown show and precious two clown show impeachments.
Democrats are continuing to remove any doubt how mentally disturbed and stupid they are. It will be a BIG boost in November for the RED tsunami coming.
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
You haven't used those exact words, but the intention is crystal clear.
The only reason you are disingenuously pretending that she's not credible is because you simply cannot fathom what happened on 1/6 and that the people you've been running cover for on JPP and indulging were responsible for it.
You are doing this because you are trying to discredit her entire testimony by discrediting this one part...but the facts are that Hutchinson would not have testified publicly to any of this shit if it wasn't already corroborated by the investigations, trials, depositions, interviews, and recordings.
Meanwhile, you all have been taken by an unnamed source from a Nazi on twitter...desperate to find anything to discredit Hutchinson, you chose to focus on the part of her testimony that had the least to do with the coup.
So the only reason you'd seek to do that is because you either have consciousness of guilt (which you should have anyway for indulging Nazis on the internet), or you simply don't want to admit that your personal judgment and instincts SUCK.
What makes you think the 1/6 Commission doesn't already have SS testimony, and why would the 1/6 commission have her testify publicly, if everything she's testifying to isn't already corroborated by the work the commission is doing?If you get one of the SS agents that this happened to to tell us about it, then you have some testimony.
Also, all this because a Nazi on twitter credited an unnamed source close to the Secret Service that particular agent was willing to testify...that agent hasn't said SHIT, and until he does -under oath- Hutchinson's version of events stand as the only truthful one thus far.
That's the DOJ's problem to figure out.Not of a criminal conspiracy, but you have testimony that isn't hearsay and inadmissible in any court.
The 1/6 commission is merely getting to the bottom of what your Nazi pals did from 2020 through 1/6.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Bookmarks