SCOTUS: cops can’t be punished for no Miranda citing

[Life is Golden]

Thank you very much for letting us know that you are a flaming homophobic!

You are welcome!

[AProudLefty]

I feel bad for your poor mom! She must be exhausted lugging a full grown baby around.

Well I wish you well in your life.

[Life is Golden]

Well I wish you well in your life.

Try to become self-sufficient. A mom can only carry a full grown baby for so long before she drops.

[Flash]

cite the text of this opinion that says what you say it says

The question we must decide is whether a violation of the Miranda rules provides a basis for a claim under §1983. We hold that it does not.

We therefore refuse to extend Miranda in the way Tekoh requests. Miranda,Dickerson, and the other cases in that line provide sufficient protection for the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination. “The identification of a Miranda violation and its consequences . . . ought to be determined at trial.” And except in unusual circumstances, the“exclusion of unwarned statements” should be “a complete and sufficient remedy.”

[SmarterthanYou]

The question we must decide is whether a violation of the Miranda rules provides a basis for a claim under §1983. We hold that it does not.

We therefore refuse to extend Miranda in the way Tekoh requests. Miranda,Dickerson, and the other cases in that line provide sufficient protection for the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination. “The identification of a Miranda violation and its consequences . . . ought to be determined at trial.” And except in unusual circumstances, the“exclusion of unwarned statements” should be “a complete and sufficient remedy.”

thank you sir, much appreciated