Savita Halappanavar, a warning to the United States.

[AProudLefty]

So? As I said earlier life of the mother abortion are legal in every state AFAIK. Even Oklahoma allows abortions for rape, incest, and life of the mother. The vast majority of the hundreds of thousands of abortions preformed every year are for convenience not rape, incest or life of the mother which the left loves to champion. Those babies are just as dead as they would be if they were aborted in the 9th month.

*Sighs* More lies. Why do you do this?

[martin]

If it has reached the age of viability it certainly is murder to kill it. Also if you kill a pregnant woman you can be charged with TWO murders in many states. Ask any 9 month pregnant mother if the human in her womb is a baby and 99.9% of them will say yes. Don't be a moron.

Having definitively said that and "murder" being a legal term, if you're not a moron show us existing federal or state law that classifies abortion at any stage of pregnancy as murder.

[Flash]

What we want is for unborn babies not to be murdered, dummy.

In a couple of weeks, the Supreme Court will stop abortion in many states.

The Supreme Court does not stop abortions.

[Life is Golden]

Some time in early 2012 Savita Hapappanavar. a 31 year old dentist. became pregnant while a resident of Ireland. She and her husband were excited about welcoming a baby into their family.

Tragedy struck on October 21, 2012 Savita Halappanavar was experiencing abdominal pain and went to the hospital where Doctors concluded that a mischarge was unavoidable. The pain Mrs. Hapappanavar was experiencing was terrible, the Doctors explained to her that while she was sure to miscarry they could not perform a life saving abortion because the abortion law did not provide an exemption for a risk to the mothers life and it did not allow abortion at the stage of her pregnancy.

Three hours later Mrs. Halappanavar and her fetus were dead.



Is this what we want in the United States?

They could have induced labor. You don't have to kill the baby to do that.

[McRocket]

Some time in early 2012 Savita Hapappanavar. a 31 year old dentist. became pregnant while a resident of Ireland. She and her husband were excited about welcoming a baby into their family.

Tragedy struck on October 21, 2012 Savita Halappanavar was experiencing abdominal pain and went to the hospital where Doctors concluded that a mischarge was unavoidable. The pain Mrs. Hapappanavar was experiencing was terrible, the Doctors explained to her that while she was sure to miscarry they could not perform a life saving abortion because the abortion law did not provide an exemption for a risk to the mothers life and it did not allow abortion at the stage of her pregnancy.

Three hours later Mrs. Halappanavar and her fetus were dead.



Is this what we want in the United States?

I don't think most on the right are calling for illegal abortions if the mother's life is at stake.

This example has little to nothing to do with America.
And it is a simplification of the case.

The woman died of sepsis.
And her condition was not diagnosed until it was too late.
Apparently, it is possible that she might have survived had the doctors diagnosed her sepsis sooner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_...mary_of_events


For the record, I am against abortions after the fetus is sentient.
I am for (though hardly thrilled with) abortions before the fetus has brain activity.

[AProudLefty]

They could have induced labor. You don't have to kill the baby to do that.

Wow.

[Earl]

The Supreme Court does not stop abortions.

It will after the June Supreme Court release of the decision...in states that choose to stop it. Some states will still allow the murder of unborn infants.

[AProudLefty]

It will after the June Supreme court...in states that choose to stop it. Some states will still allow the murder of unborn infants.

How will they stop abortions?

[Life is Golden]

Wow.

Yes, when a pregnant woman is in distress, the object is to get the baby out of the body by inducing labor.

Killing the baby prior to it's induction into the world is not necessary to "save the mother." The assertion is ludicrous and designed for dumb people

It is common sense for thinking people.

[AProudLefty]

Yes, when a pregnant woman is in distress, the object is to get the baby out of the body by inducing labor.

Killing the baby prior to it's induction into the world is not necessary to "save the mother." The assertion is ludicrous and designed for dumb people

It is common sense for thinking people.

I guess you didn't understand the OP.

[Life is Golden]

I don't think most on the right are calling for illegal abortions if the mother's life is at stake.

What medical condition requires the baby be dead upon his/her induction into the world in order to "save a mother's life?"

Name one.

All that is needed to ever save a mother is to induce labor, you don't have to kill the baby to get it out of the body.

This is very basic common sense.

[AProudLefty]

What medical condition requires the baby be dead upon his/her induction into the world in order to "save a mother's life?"

Name one.

All that is needed to ever save a mother is to induce labor, you don't have to kill the baby to get it out of the body.

This is very basic common sense.

Inducing labor can kill both. Amazing you don't know basic biology.

[Geeko Sportivo]

What we want is for unborn babies not to be murdered, dummy.

In a couple of weeks, the Supreme Court will stop abortion in many states.

You do not give one flying FUCK about abortions.

What makes your little sticker peck out is you thinking you can describe Democrats as murderers and forcing women to carry their unwanted or dangerous pregnancies to full-term.

You like being able to control women don't you?

There is nowhere in the Constitution that describes a fetus as a living being or having any rights.

Leaving matters up to Fuckwads like you, women weren't even allowed to vote until 1920, and Black Women weren't even allowed to vote until 1965.

Well Women have the right of choice currently- SO FUCK OFF IF YOU DON'T LIKE WOMEN HAVING THAT FREEDOM!

It has nothing to do with men's decisions! It's their body NUMBSKULL!

Abortions are going to outlive you OLD FART. You'll die- Abortions will continue! Just so you will know!

AND WHAT A HILARIOUS AND PLEASANT THOUGHT!

[Life is Golden]

Inducing labor can kill both. Amazing you don't know basic biology.

Lots of things "can" kill. That isn't the issue at hand and you haven't refuted my point.

Name one medical condition which requires a baby to be dead on arrival in order to "save the mother."

Just one.

[Althea]

Each state will be able to decide what they want. In the few that may not allow any abortions, noting will stop the transfer of the mother to a state that does allow abortion to save the mother. . Most states will choose legal abortions to save the life of the mother rape and incest. Stop being hyperbolic. Let me ask you a question, if all states allowed abortions to save the lives of mothers, rape, and incest and nothing else would you then agree with that?

Nope. No Red state will allow this.

Some of these morons are already talking about prosecuting women who leave the state for an abortion.