All this bitching about cops doing nothing...well

[volsrock]

The Police are Not Required to Protect You

In the 1989 landmark case of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the failure by government workers to protect someone (even 4-year-old Joshua DeShaney) from physical violence or harm from another person (his father) did not breach any substantive constitutional duty

Nevertheless, the Court found that the government had no affirmative duty to protect any person, even a child, from harm by another person.


The “no duty to protect” rule remains unwavering and the law today.


https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/po...quired-protect

One reason to carry a gun! Protect yourself because the police dont have to

Have armed teachers to protect the kids...because cops dont have to as was the case in Texas... 3 teachers trained with guns inside that school may have saved lives...while the cops stood outside because they dont have to do SHIT

[AProudLefty]

The Police are Not Required to Protect You

In the 1989 landmark case of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the failure by government workers to protect someone (even 4-year-old Joshua DeShaney) from physical violence or harm from another person (his father) did not breach any substantive constitutional duty

Nevertheless, the Court found that the government had no affirmative duty to protect any person, even a child, from harm by another person.


The “no duty to protect” rule remains unwavering and the law today.


https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/po...quired-protect

One reason to carry a gun! Protect yourself because the police dont have to

Have armed teachers to protect the kids...because cops dont have to as was the case in Texas... 3 teachers trained with guns inside that school may have saved lives...while the cops stood outside because they dont have to do SHIT

So why did they prevent the parents from rescuing their kids?