Members banned from this thread: moon, archives, Guno צְבִי, Poor Richard Saunders, gemini104104 and Doc Dutch


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Clinton campaign aides try to ‘protect the queen’ at ex-lawyer’s trial: legal expert

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default Clinton campaign aides try to ‘protect the queen’ at ex-lawyer’s trial: legal expert

    .
    I don't know if the Queen is totally protected but she has some very loyal couriers who'll fall on their swords rather than sacrifice her.

    Bombshell testimony that Hillary Clinton personally authorized giving a reporter since-debunked data about Donald Trump and Russia was part of a chess-like maneuver to “protect the queen,” a former US Justice Department official told The Post.

    Jim Trusty said former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook’s revelation Friday, which he quickly tried to walk back, actually meshed with other testimony in which Mook and former campaign general counsel Marc Elias both said they were unaware campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann planned to also provide the information to the FBI.

    Both men said they would have objected to the move if they’d known.

    “The strategy here is Protect the Queen!” Trusty said in an email.

    “The Knights (lawyers for the campaign, the campaign manager) have drawn the line – admitting what they have to admit.”

    Meanwhile, Mook and Elias also suggested that Clinton “was shocked, shocked by Sussmann going to the FBI,” said Trusty, now a Washington, DC, lawyer.

    “Legal representation simply does not work that way. You don’t ‘free-lance’ a visit to the FBI while billing your client for the time,” he said.

    The defense is basically trying to provide a fig leaf to any partisan jurors who want to acquit.”

    Former FBI agent Thomas J. Baker also told The Post, “Whether Sussmann is found guilty or innocent or otherwise, [special counsel John] Durham has already laid out, in my opinion, what these people were up to and what was going on.

    “It paints a picture of Sussmann colluding with other people to drag the FBI into an investigation and besmirch a presidential candidate,” he said.

    Sussmann is on trial in DC on a single count of lying to the government when he met with then-FBI general counsel James Baker on Sept. 19, 2016, and handed over material that purportedly showed a cyber backchannel between a Trump Organization server and Russia’s Alfa Bank.

    He’s accused of falsely denying that he was acting on behalf of a client, with Durham alleging that Sussmann was actually working for both the Clinton campaign and Rodney Joffe, a tech executive who told him about the data.

    Clinton campaign aides try to ‘protect the queen’ at ex-lawyer’s trial: legal expert

    Bombshell testimony that Hillary Clinton personally authorized giving a reporter since-debunked data about Donald Trump and Russia was part of a chess-like maneuver to “protect the queen,” a former US Justice Department official told The Post.

    Jim Trusty said former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook’s revelation Friday, which he quickly tried to walk back, actually meshed with other testimony in which Mook and former campaign general counsel Marc Elias both said they were unaware campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann planned to also provide the information to the FBI.

    Both men said they would have objected to the move if they’d known.

    “The strategy here is Protect the Queen!” Trusty said in an email.

    “The Knights (lawyers for the campaign, the campaign manager) have drawn the line – admitting what they have to admit.”

    Meanwhile, Mook and Elias also suggested that Clinton “was shocked, shocked by Sussmann going to the FBI,” said Trusty, now a Washington, DC, lawyer.

    “Legal representation simply does not work that way. You don’t ‘free-lance’ a visit to the FBI while billing your client for the time,” he said.


    “The defense is basically trying to provide a fig leaf to any partisan jurors who want to acquit.”

    Former FBI agent Thomas J. Baker also told The Post, “Whether Sussmann is found guilty or innocent or otherwise, [special counsel John] Durham has already laid out, in my opinion, what these people were up to and what was going on.

    “It paints a picture of Sussmann colluding with other people to drag the FBI into an investigation and besmirch a presidential candidate,” he said.

    Sussmann is on trial in DC on a single count of lying to the government when he met with then-FBI general counsel James Baker on Sept. 19, 2016, and handed over material that purportedly showed a cyber backchannel between a Trump Organization server and Russia’s Alfa Bank.

    He’s accused of falsely denying that he was acting on behalf of a client, with Durham alleging that Sussmann was actually working for both the Clinton campaign and Rodney Joffe, a tech executive who told him about the data.

    Thomas Baker suggested that the case against Sussmann would be stronger if not for changes instituted by former FBI Director Robert Mueller following the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

    “Moving away from being a law enforcement agency to an intelligence agency changed the culture,” he said.

    “Part of it is they got rid of agent-executives and replaced them with so-called professionals, like James Baker.”

    Thomas Baker said that if James Baker had been an FBI agent, he would have immediately summoned another agent to participate in the meeting with Sussmann and prepare an official report known as a “302.”

    https://nypost.com/2022/05/22/clinto...ussmann-trial/
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 05-23-2022 at 12:07 AM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Earl (05-24-2022), ExpressLane (05-24-2022), PostmodernProphet (05-25-2022)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,630
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,269 Times in 13,402 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 841 Times in 800 Posts

    Default

    Well, the Hildabeast and the Red Queen have a lot in common...


  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 230 Times in 141 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 20 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Are ya'll still getting wet over the idea that Hillary is going to be locked up? If Republicans could have done it they would have decades ago...even just in the past few years. Hell, she must be one exceptionally talented criminal who can commit all that crime (murder included), hide her tracks pretty damn good, yet couldn't figure out how to off her one major road block to the White House.

    Ya'all are hilarious. I mean if you want politicians to go to jail for corruption then why not point out the ones in your own party and demand they get locked up as well? Seems fair.

  5. The Following User Groans At Coolred44 For This Awful Post:

    Earl (05-24-2022)

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Coolred44 For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-24-2022), ThatOwlWoman (05-24-2022)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    .
    I don't know if the Queen is totally protected but she has some very loyal couriers who'll fall on their swords rather than sacrifice her.

    Bombshell testimony that Hillary Clinton personally authorized giving a reporter since-debunked data about Donald Trump and Russia was part of a chess-like maneuver to “protect the queen,” a former US Justice Department official told The Post.

    Jim Trusty said former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook’s revelation Friday, which he quickly tried to walk back, actually meshed with other testimony in which Mook and former campaign general counsel Marc Elias both said they were unaware campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann planned to also provide the information to the FBI.

    Both men said they would have objected to the move if they’d known.

    “The strategy here is Protect the Queen!” Trusty said in an email.

    “The Knights (lawyers for the campaign, the campaign manager) have drawn the line – admitting what they have to admit.”

    Meanwhile, Mook and Elias also suggested that Clinton “was shocked, shocked by Sussmann going to the FBI,” said Trusty, now a Washington, DC, lawyer.

    “Legal representation simply does not work that way. You don’t ‘free-lance’ a visit to the FBI while billing your client for the time,” he said.

    The defense is basically trying to provide a fig leaf to any partisan jurors who want to acquit.”

    Former FBI agent Thomas J. Baker also told The Post, “Whether Sussmann is found guilty or innocent or otherwise, [special counsel John] Durham has already laid out, in my opinion, what these people were up to and what was going on.

    “It paints a picture of Sussmann colluding with other people to drag the FBI into an investigation and besmirch a presidential candidate,” he said.

    Sussmann is on trial in DC on a single count of lying to the government when he met with then-FBI general counsel James Baker on Sept. 19, 2016, and handed over material that purportedly showed a cyber backchannel between a Trump Organization server and Russia’s Alfa Bank.

    He’s accused of falsely denying that he was acting on behalf of a client, with Durham alleging that Sussmann was actually working for both the Clinton campaign and Rodney Joffe, a tech executive who told him about the data.

    Clinton campaign aides try to ‘protect the queen’ at ex-lawyer’s trial: legal expert

    Bombshell testimony that Hillary Clinton personally authorized giving a reporter since-debunked data about Donald Trump and Russia was part of a chess-like maneuver to “protect the queen,” a former US Justice Department official told The Post.

    Jim Trusty said former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook’s revelation Friday, which he quickly tried to walk back, actually meshed with other testimony in which Mook and former campaign general counsel Marc Elias both said they were unaware campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann planned to also provide the information to the FBI.

    Both men said they would have objected to the move if they’d known.

    “The strategy here is Protect the Queen!” Trusty said in an email.

    “The Knights (lawyers for the campaign, the campaign manager) have drawn the line – admitting what they have to admit.”

    Meanwhile, Mook and Elias also suggested that Clinton “was shocked, shocked by Sussmann going to the FBI,” said Trusty, now a Washington, DC, lawyer.

    “Legal representation simply does not work that way. You don’t ‘free-lance’ a visit to the FBI while billing your client for the time,” he said.


    “The defense is basically trying to provide a fig leaf to any partisan jurors who want to acquit.”

    Former FBI agent Thomas J. Baker also told The Post, “Whether Sussmann is found guilty or innocent or otherwise, [special counsel John] Durham has already laid out, in my opinion, what these people were up to and what was going on.

    “It paints a picture of Sussmann colluding with other people to drag the FBI into an investigation and besmirch a presidential candidate,” he said.

    Sussmann is on trial in DC on a single count of lying to the government when he met with then-FBI general counsel James Baker on Sept. 19, 2016, and handed over material that purportedly showed a cyber backchannel between a Trump Organization server and Russia’s Alfa Bank.

    He’s accused of falsely denying that he was acting on behalf of a client, with Durham alleging that Sussmann was actually working for both the Clinton campaign and Rodney Joffe, a tech executive who told him about the data.

    Thomas Baker suggested that the case against Sussmann would be stronger if not for changes instituted by former FBI Director Robert Mueller following the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

    “Moving away from being a law enforcement agency to an intelligence agency changed the culture,” he said.

    “Part of it is they got rid of agent-executives and replaced them with so-called professionals, like James Baker.”

    Thomas Baker said that if James Baker had been an FBI agent, he would have immediately summoned another agent to participate in the meeting with Sussmann and prepare an official report known as a “302.”

    https://nypost.com/2022/05/22/clinto...ussmann-trial/
    .

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    LOCK HER UP!!!!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Earl (05-24-2022)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,471
    Thanks
    78,142
    Thanked 23,663 Times in 17,923 Posts
    Groans
    38,842
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Her worst punishment is that she was beaten by Trump.

    Second...she will never be president.
    Last edited by Earl; 05-24-2022 at 07:26 AM.

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-25-2022), Matt Dillon (05-24-2022), Stone (05-25-2022)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Her worst punishment i8s that she was beaten by Trump.

    Second...she will never be president.
    not enough. she conspired to take out Trump by crooked means
    Of course so did the FBI after Trump got in. The country has no accountability

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-25-2022), Earl (05-24-2022), Matt Dillon (05-24-2022)

  14. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,471
    Thanks
    78,142
    Thanked 23,663 Times in 17,923 Posts
    Groans
    38,842
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    not enough. she conspired to take out Trump by crooked means
    Of course so did the FBI after Trump got in. The country has no accountability
    It isn't nearly enough but it's probably all we can expect.

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Trump ass kissers have been consistently obsessed with Hillary Clinton since 1992.

    That's three decades folks, stretching back into the last century.

    That is really extraordinary, and unprecedented in political history as far as I know.

  16. The Following User Groans At Cypress For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-25-2022)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    It isn't nearly enough but it's probably all we can expect.
    of course. what you posted is her karma - no brass ring despite making it a crooked game
    I'd like some justice, but accountability aint happening

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Matt Dillon (05-24-2022)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Trump ass kissers have been consistently obsessed with Hillary Clinton since 1992.

    That's three decades folks, stretching back into the last century.

    That is really extraordinary, and unprecedented in political history as far as I know.
    There was no political Trump in 1992, dude.

    I fapped to aqua dress bob-haired Hillary in 1995. That was the year of the attack of the bobs.

    Hillary had a nice figure back in the day.

    Can't find any pics, but she had dat ass! back in the day.
    Last edited by Matt Dillon; 05-24-2022 at 08:44 AM.

  20. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    of course. what you posted is her karma - no brass ring despite making it a crooked game
    I'd like some justice, but accountability aint happening
    There's no justice in America anymore. There's Just us.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt Dillon For This Post:

    dukkha (05-25-2022)

  22. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Trump ass kissers have been consistently obsessed with Hillary Clinton since 1992.

    That's three decades folks, stretching back into the last century.

    That is really extraordinary, and unprecedented in political history as far as I know.
    Trump did the world a huge favour by stopping her becoming president.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    dukkha (05-25-2022)

  24. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    It isn't nearly enough but it's probably all we can expect.
    There's much more to come, watch this space.

  25. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,743
    Thanks
    102,643
    Thanked 55,137 Times in 33,847 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,083 Times in 4,699 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Trump ass kissers have been consistently obsessed with Hillary Clinton since 1992.

    That's three decades folks, stretching back into the last century.

    That is really extraordinary, and unprecedented in political history as far as I know.
    Durham and the DOJ have not proven their case, “beyond a reasonable doubt” in my following of the trial.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Cypress (05-25-2022)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-17-2022, 03:30 PM
  2. Durham issues trial subpoenas to Clinton campaign and DNC
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 04-25-2022, 05:32 PM
  3. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 01-18-2020, 04:40 PM
  4. Aides stole Trump's papers 'to protect the country
    By Guno צְבִי in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2018, 01:01 PM
  5. Clinton and Romeny campaign managers join to protect the vote
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-28-2017, 06:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •