TOP AVG. SAT SCORE STATES: ALL IN "FLYOVER COUNTRY"

[zymurgy]

so, after doing some research, this thread is a perfect example of stats can be used to say anything

https://blog.prepscholar.com/average...te-most-recent

Unfortunately, Delaware underperforms the national average by more than 75 points. This is likely due to the high percentage of seniors who took the SAT in Delaware (96%). In other states where less than 5% of seniors took the SAT, it's likely only the most prepared students taking the SAT, thus bumping up the average.

[Grokmaster]

so, after doing some research, this thread is a perfect example of stats can be used to say anything

https://blog.prepscholar.com/average...te-most-recent

Unfortunately, Delaware underperforms the national average by more than 75 points. This is likely due to the high percentage of seniors who took the SAT in Delaware (96%). In other states where less than 5% of seniors took the SAT, it's likely only the most prepared students taking the SAT, thus bumping up the average.

I stated a FACT, and then BACKED IT UP WITH THE DATA. PERIOD.

[zymurgy]

I stated a FACT, and then BACKED IT UP WITH THE DATA. PERIOD.

so did I.

the states that did well did well because only the smart ones that plan on going out East take the SAT. the results are skewed heavily as a result

[Grokmaster]

so did I.

the states that did well did well because only the smart ones that plan on going out East take the SAT. the results are skewed heavily as a result

No, you've added a lot of SPECULATION from the link as to who did what why...etc


AKA: "BULLSHIT". I just posted the scores, which cannot be changed via speculation.

In addition, I'm not so sure that the site has the participation rates correct.

Only 2% of Minnesota kids took the SAT? I doubt that.

[zymurgy]

No, you've added a lot of your own SPECULATION.

not really. I showed how you are taking advantage of states that don't compel testing - or test for the ACT - not the SAT -

https://www.niche.com/blog/students-...in-each-state/

people that have closed minds and ignore data that refutes their closed mind tend to debate like you do.

[Grokmaster]

not really. I showed how you are taking advantage of states that don't compel testing - or test for the ACT - not the SAT -

https://www.niche.com/blog/students-...in-each-state/

people that have closed minds and ignore data that refutes their closed mind tend to debate like you do.

No, you cited the "explanations" for certain states' scores from the blog site = "speculation".

They do not know what they guess at.

[Flash]

not really. I showed how you are taking advantage of states that don't compel testing - or test for the ACT - not the SAT -

https://www.niche.com/blog/students-...in-each-state/

people that have closed minds and ignore data that refutes their closed mind tend to debate like you do.

This has long been an established fact that those schools with a higher percentage of students attending (or planning to attend) college have a lower SAT score than states with a much smaller percent attending. Therefore, only the top students take the test in some states resulting in a higher average score while most students take it in others resulting in a lower average score.

Also, in some states a much large percent attend community college and most are open admissions and require no SAT.

[zymurgy]

No, you cited the "explanations" for certain states' scores from the blog site = "speculation".

WE SEE WHO THE MOST INTELLIGENT STATES REALLY ARE, WHEN WE EXAMINE THE AVERAGE SAT SCORES GENERATE BY THE STUDENTS FROM THEIR HIGH SCHOOLS; WE ALSO SEE THE DUMBASSES.

this is incredibly retarded. In Iowa - the 2.4 % of students that took the SAT scored higher than the 95.2% that took the test in Delaware

and you now know Iowa high school kids are more intelligent

NO

What we know is when you and I line up - you are dumber. this exchange tells us that and only that.

[BidenPresident]

this is incredibly retarded. In Iowa - the 2.4 % of students that took the SAT scored higher than the 95.2% that took the test in Delaware

and you now know Iowa high school kids are more intelligent

NO

What we know is when you and I line up - you are dumber. this exchange tells us that and only that.

Grok is a moron. I don't read his garbage anymore.

[zymurgy]

Grok is a moron. I don't read his garbage anymore.

he atleast introduces things that are compelling.

you are the biggest shit stain on these forums - although this mina person is giving you a good running

[BidenPresident]

he atleast introduces things that are compelling.

you are the biggest shit stain on these forums - although this mina person is giving you a good running

forgot to put you on ignore

[zymurgy]

forgot to put you on ignore

you mean you lied about it for the 5th time

[Geeko Sportivo]

Opie Dopey thinks that population has nothing to do with SAT scores.

There are more people living in San Jose (population 1,013,240) city limits, than in....

Wyoming (Population: 581,075)
Vermont (Population: 623,251)
District of Columbia (Population: 714,153)
Alaska (Population: 724,357)
North Dakota (Population: 770,026)
South Dakota (Population: 896,581)
Delaware (Population: 990,334)

So, if you are not taking under consideration that more people living in any area, would naturally produce more Lower SAT scores, your comparison is that of comparing apples to oranges.

What an idiot to make that kind of a comparison.

Have you ever heard of the term Per Capita or even understand why most comparisons take that under consideration?

NEXT STUPID HATE THREAD PLEASE!

[Poor Richard Saunders]

WE SEE WHO THE MOST INTELLIGENT STATES REALLY ARE, WHEN WE EXAMINE THE AVERAGE SAT SCORES GENERATE BY THE STUDENTS FROM THEIR HIGH SCHOOLS; WE ALSO SEE THE DUMBASSES.

LOWEST AVERAGE SAT SCORES= DELAWARE; ANYONE SURPRISED BY THAT?

PRES.MORON FROM THE STATE WITH THE LOWEST SAT SCORES. NO KIDDING?

STATES IN "FLYOVER COUNTRY", AS THE ARROGANT IDIOTS REFER TO THE HEARTLAND, NEARLY ALL AVERAGE WELL OVER 1200 ON THEIR SATS.

CALIFORNIA? 1057


NEW YORK? 1057 (Equally stupid)


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA? 987

ETC...ETC.....ETC....


The TOP SCORES: (ALL AVERAGE OVER 1200)

IOWA KANSAS KENTUCKY MINNESOTA MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI MONTANA



NEBRASKA

NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE UTAH WISCONSIN WYOMING







https://blog.prepscholar.com/average...te-most-recent






"FLYOVER" THAT, BITCHES.

Obviously you got about 300 on your SAT since both your math and your reading skills suck.
The article you linked to is almost like a math word problem.

But wait—Minnesota also has lower test participation than most of the US at 2%. In other words, just 1,709 seniors who graduated in 2021 took the SAT. ...
Because more students in Minnesota take the ACT than they do the SAT, Minnesota's high average SAT score likely means that only the most prepared, ambitious high schoolers take the SAT.

Unfortunately, Delaware underperforms the national average by more than 75 points. This is likely due to the high percentage of seniors who took the SAT in Delaware (96%).

When you compare states that have comparable numbers taking the test, you see something completely different in the data. You start to see that based on the percentages of students taking the test, blue states have higher scores than red states.

These are the states where 50-80% of students take the SAT, lowest scores to highest scores....

Florida 81% 993
Texas 59% 1003
Illinois 80% 1007
Rhode Island 68% 1011
Michigan 68% 1031
New York 55% 1057
New Hampshire 71% 1065
Colorado 56% 1072
Connecticut 69% 1072

These are the states where 30-48% of students take the SAT, lowest scores to highest scores

New Mexico 30% 996
West Virginia 45% 1007
South Carolina 48% 1036
Maryland 47% 1073
Georgia 41% 1086
Indiana 43% 1095
Pennsylvania 39% 1123
Vermont 41% 1124
New Jersey 48% 1125
Virginia 41% 1151
Massachusetts 34% 1184

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Opie Dopey thinks that population has nothing to do with SAT scores.

There are more people living in San Jose (population 1,013,240) city limits, than in....

Wyoming (Population: 581,075)
Vermont (Population: 623,251)
District of Columbia (Population: 714,153)
Alaska (Population: 724,357)
North Dakota (Population: 770,026)
South Dakota (Population: 896,581)
Delaware (Population: 990,334)

So, if you are not taking under consideration that more people living in any area, would naturally produce more Lower SAT scores, your comparison is that of comparing apples to oranges.

What an idiot to make that kind of a comparison.

Have you ever heard of the term Per Capita or even understand why most comparisons take that under consideration?

NEXT STUPID HATE THREAD PLEASE!

The problem is not the population but the percentages of eligible students that take the test. If only 2% of eligible students take the SAT in MN and 81% take the test in FL, you are comparing the top 2% of students in MN to the top 81% of students in FL. Hardly a fair comparison. If you were to compare MN to FL with ACT scores you might see the exact opposite results with FL scoring higher.