several Clinton donors are jurist in Sussman trial

[dukkha]

The judge also accepted a donor to GOP so your argument is Bullshit.

The judge is a farce. the trial is a pig circus.
Durham was supposed to find the predicate,, we at least got that much our of it. Clinton did it

[Concart]

That's exactly how it works. I was the foreman on a Federal case some years ago.

No it isn't. Being a foreman on a jury doesn't make you an expert. That's obvious in your case. The size of juries is determined by the type of charge. And jurors can be struck for no reason by either side, but they are limited in the number of strikes they are allowed. Only a judge can determine bias. But that point is moot. This case has nothing, NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.

[dukkha]

No it isn't. Being a foreman on a jury doesn't make you an expert. That's obvious in your case. The size of juries is determined by the type of charge. And jurors can be struck for no reason by either side, but they are limited in the number of strikes they are allowed. Only a judge can determine bias. But that point is moot. This case has nothing, NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.

it has everything to do with the Clinton campaign

[Poor Richard Saunders]

True Baker is a crooked Swamp Critter
But the text backs him up as well.. I dont study the minutia - no point.
Durham sniffed out Clinton bought and paid for the Steele dossier and misrepresented it to the FBI while Nellie Ohr was backdooring it

Then the whole fake FISA and a special counsel appointed while page testified they had no evidence of Russian collusion
I ertainly dont expect any justice - this is the Swamp. More light on the cockroaches is the most I expect

The text doesn't necessarily back him up. It shows he could be remembering the text and not the meeting. Doubt is required for acquittal.
You can't be convicted for robbing a bank on Oct 6 just because there is evidence of you robbing the bank on Oct 5.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The judge is a farce. the trial is a pig circus.
Durham was supposed to find the predicate,, we at least got that much our of it. Clinton did it

The judge has been very fair. He has bent over backwards for Durham's lies and failure to comply with the law.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

it has everything to do with the Clinton campaign

No. It doesn't. The court has made that clear.

[evince]

Not when they have opinions or ties to the case they don't. And it works both ways.

That said, I don't trust the DOJ. Both prosecution and defense have the same right to pick or reject each member of the jury. They must both agree on each of the number of jurors needed and alternates.

The judge decides in the end


You know the person running the court


But the judge should recuse if their spouse is involved in the case dont you think?

[ExpressLane]

This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors

Jury nullification

[RB 60]

As a foreman on the jury you weren't privy to the process that every juror was selected.

The transcript from the day of jury selection clearly shows the judge asking jurors if they can be impartial, and after they say, "yes." telling the prosecution they can use a peremptory strike if they don't like the juror.

I was part of that selection process. I guess I should have clarified myself. Sorry for overestimating your perception.

[RB 60]

No it isn't. Being a foreman on a jury doesn't make you an expert. That's obvious in your case. The size of juries is determined by the type of charge. And jurors can be struck for no reason by either side, but they are limited in the number of strikes they are allowed. Only a judge can determine bias. But that point is moot. This case has nothing, NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.

And your experience on a Federal jury or the selection process is...?

[RB 60]

The judge decides in the end


You know the person running the court


But the judge should recuse if their spouse is involved in the case dont you think?

Which judge's spouse is involved?

[evince]

Which judge's spouse is involved?

Haahahahahahahahaha


What a RUBEpublican

[Matt Dillon]

This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors

That's a conflict of interest.

There's no justice in America anymore.

[ExpressLane]

Hillary's Campaign manager said Hillary personally gave the go ahead to give the fake Trump tower alpha bank server story to the media.

[evince]

Hillary's Campaign manager said Hillary personally gave the go ahead to give the fake Trump tower alpha bank server story to the media.

Link